Red Dead Redemption 2

>3 second clip in a trailer
>1 line in a mission
every homo has a beard. john is the only one i saw with a family and he still got cucked by marrying a hooker

>people pave over nature
>then make video games with natural scenes
>consumer whores laud it

>hold captcha to post comment
For the input controls in this game. Fuck them to hell. 76% of the total ply time is spent holding a context button to perform an action or access an item

Sick burn bro. For the record, both RDR2 and BOTW are equally shit. If you think any AAA open world games are good you need to fuck off back to plebbit.

>and will be forgotten in a year
It will be re-released in a year

God if she got me when I was 15 it would have blown my little punk mind. i was 6'2" and 8 inches at 15, i could have done it.

You're right RD1 was rereleased on every conso...
No I think that this game is going to be forgotten.

>The draw distance in this game is far too low
yeah ok fag, show me one better on current gen hardware. Not PC. Becasue when this comes out on PC this will be the bench mark, even beyond Cyberpunk 2077

Attached: yw7D7wC.jpg (1920x1080, 297K)

>conveniently

There are zero (0) games that have been released in history that have even a 3/10 score for draw distance. RDR2 would be a 2/10. My point was that the technology we have right now is so limited compared to the future that it will be painful to play these games, you are looking at a game that will be just like the PS1 games in 10 years. People will look at the horizon in the future and have headaches because it is so limited. That's why this game is far beyond over hyped in my view, it is still a game and not an experience to be remembered.

>PC
LMAO

Attached: 1558962361102.webm (960x540, 2.32M)

> Becasue when this comes out on PC

So never? Wow you really know how to make a strong argument, don't you nigger?

Did they ever fix the lighting in single player after downgrading it in a patch?

soifags

Attached: ivm9y5d8lbw11.jpg (1920x1072, 131K)

Yes, it has legit HDR now too. It's also easier to gain and lose weight too

>Did they ever fix the lighting in single player after downgrading it in a patch?
you don't know what you're talking about for 1, but here, do some homework

youtube.com/watch?v=Rs3WFXtqmcc

we pretty much have exhausted the CPU/GPU gold mine. Moore's law is dead and computer tech is plateauing

Needs single player dlc. Online is better than it used to be but still sucks. No pay outs for missions is fucking idiotic

Yeah just like how vacuum tubes couldn't be improved and was the death of a more advanced technology? Technology will always advance, and always at a faster pace than before, the only exception is losing technology we already have. Plateaus are not real.

we are running up against physical limits. the speed of light is appallingly slow. atoms are appallingly big. we have cranked frequencies as high as they go, we have pipelined processor as far as they can go, we have multicored as far as is productive, we are currently pushing on the limits of parallelization on single GPUs. Optical components aren't going to solve any big problems. The only real things left to push on are cloud computing (and that's just gonna introduce all sorts of latency), FPGA modules, and compute fabrics.

Face it, we had a good run, but we aren't going to see the explosive performance increases that we grew up with.

Sure and before flapping your arms wishing to be a bird was impossible with the understanding of aerodynamics that medieval humans had, yet all it took was discovering more about the world around us and evolving science. We do not have all the information of the Universe and to think that with are limited understanding we can limit the future is complete hypocrisy. If one area of science is a dead end than we will just find a new one, it is inevitable.

don't shoot the messenger, user. also, learn some computer engineering if you want to sound convincing

Attached: soy.webm (480x360, 607K)

What’s the new horse exploit?

there is none. youre stuck with the saggy balls in lemoyne and tight balls in cold snow

So where is comptech gonna go from here? More bells and whistles? Focus on cloud computing? How do you think products will change?

Rdr2 was boring. Its like 35% awesome game, 65% boring as fuck snorefest. A clue about how boring a game is , is when reddit fags use the code word "comfy".

the milky way is not visible under a bright moon. what retard designed this game

>postmodern revisionist western #3952
It's like Rockstar writers watched Tombstone, the Wild Bunch, and The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, and then had this monumental circle jerk over Western films and decided to incorporate it into the game as a pile of combined vomit on the floor.

Attached: 1556437317939.gif (197x200, 2.25M)

In the short term, I think the easiest gains in computing power will be cloud solutions because you just have to have an internet connection as a consumer. but they are huge sources of latency and security issues

next easiest is adding FPGA modules to all computers. FPGAs are like reconfigurable hardware, and hardware is fast. I think Intel is starting to design or manufacture on-CPU chip FPGA solutions. Pretty much if you wanted to accelerate a particular function, or even needed a specialized CPU with custom instructions, you could reconfigure the FPGA and access the "new" hardware from the CPU. FPGAs aren't as fast as highly optimized CPUs, but they can manipulate data much faster because they can be optimized for the task at hand.

harder optimizations would be integrating optical components on CPUs to move data faster. it turns out the speed of light is so slow, data can't even physically propagate across a CPU die any longer in a single clock cycle. optics would help fix that, but they would only be used to pipe data long distances. the rest of the CPU would be electric.

more speculatively, we could make computer fabrics that have special CPU-memory topologies. for instance, imagine neural net processors like CPUs in a grid that can only talk to adjacent CPUs. data could flow in one side and out the other. In addition, a return to analog computing may allow some types of computer operations to run at the speed of light, but this would be highly niche. highly unlikely are DNA computers, that use biology to do computation.

lastly, quantum computers are going to be, at the very best, like floating point units; good for only a handful of math operations.

there's hope, it's just harder to find

Attached: 1558834206425.png (1415x1065, 942K)