He pays for games with less than 100 hours of gameplay

>he pays for games with less than 100 hours of gameplay

Attached: 1412279507456.jpg (259x220, 58K)

fpbp

>he pays for games

Attached: yarr.jpg (400x400, 31K)

>he plays games at all

repent to God now and thank him for this bountiful harvest NOW

I actually see more gameplay as bad. I would rather have 10 amazing totally different 10 hour experiences. than a single 100 hour one. multiplayer focused games are different ofc. But no game can go 100 hours without any lulz. tedium or unnecessary fluff. some games like Persona are worth it. But they do not benefit from it. I so not get this meme of value Being attached to playtime. no other medium has this.
People don't check runtime to see if a movie is worth $12 to see.

>he pays

Attached: Charles+Dion+McDowell.jpg (1200x675, 72K)

>he play games with a learning curve lower than 1k hours

Attached: 1521252819179.png (500x322, 42K)

Today's trend of open world exploration with a scaling enemies and endless quest hubs of ever repeating stuff is not worth it.
It's like the game is speaking without having anything to say.
It's not as memorable as the 3 hours of portal.

>he pays for games just like JRPGs thinking they're better than a nice 12 hour single player experience because he gets more value grinding for hours like a sheep

as a poorfag this is a rule i always follow. its served me well so far

Attached: 1541217360022.jpg (888x960, 97K)