GTA IV is better than GTA V

GTA IV is better than GTA V

Attached: GTA IV vs V Cops.webm (994x560, 2.85M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/SDUcoDnsHvI
gta.fandom.com/wiki/Random_characters/GTA_IV
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

GTA IV looks like grey dull shit. the physics don't make up for that.

Just waiting for VI to come out so Yea Forums can retroactively act like V was the best thing ever

It takes place in a mock NYC dumbass. You're really whining that it's too grey?

>muh colors
turn up the saturation, numbnuts

that only happens when things get worse.
can't get much worse than the unfinished shit that is V.

yes, there are games that take place in NYC that don't look half as grey and lifeless.

Look mom I made this thread again!

That'll never happen.

A middle ground between these two would be perfect

>there are games that take place in NYC that don't look half as grey and lifeless
Name them.
Also NYC is actually just as grey and lifeless in real life as depicted in GTA IV, if not more.
IV is almost a spiritual successor to the first 2 Max Payne's, the games that perfected the atmosphere of New York.
Funny how you never hear anyone bitching about how those games aren't "colorful" enough.

Attached: NYC 2.jpg (1024x685, 181K)

Water is wet

They're both shit, your tastes are garbage. Try getting better taste.

>They both suck!
Damn what a wild opinion, badass

>NYC on a cloudy day
>IV looks like shit even on a sunny day
>name them
spider man

Hello Rockstar. Suck my uncut dick you hook-nosed kikes. Also when's Bully 2?

Not enough bloom/saturation for you?

Attached: GTA IV Tbogt_.jpg (1280x720, 207K)

>Driving is the main mode of transportation.
>It's complete dogshit.
>People defend it anyway.

Attached: 152312357845.gif (300x300, 892K)

GTA IV had so little vehicles and areas when it came out compared to San Andreas. In that way it felt like I went back to GTA3 again with GTA4.
GTA5 was like San Andreas from the get-go in terms of content. The AI was made a lot simpler because I guess they learned from GTA4 studies that most players didn't care and preferred more predictable and easier AI (except for combat, which GTA5's cop AI is pretty good at).
They are both tremendous achievements in gamemaking for the sheer scale and quality of them. They and Rockstar's other new open world games are some the best and most comprehensive realtime virtual simulations of reality ever made

>uncut dick

Attached: 1518052271681.gif (300x225, 1.99M)

>people wanted more shit to do in GTA V
>its locked behind hours of grinding in online
>it still sucks compared to SAMP

>(except for combat, which GTA5's cop AI is pretty good at)
Laser-sight accuracy doesn't mean good ai you fucking dunce

compared to V that looks like ass sadly. even in your webm neither shows particularly sunny days yet the colours are better in V. weather phenomenon are also vastly better in V and this matters to me as someone who's a fan of meteorology.

>Also when's Bully 2?
Coming soon with a female protag, but I bet you'd like that wouldn't you faggot?

they're both painfully mediocre games

It's a compressed image I found on google images, so of course it's not going to look as good. Sadly I have no decent screenshots.
Also graphics are the one thing V has over IV, no one is arguing that.

>boring shit
>nothing to even do outside missions
>but it gets a "its better than X" because muh technology

You fags are the fucking worst.

T. Brainlet

Lmfao this.

When the fuck is GTAVI coming out thought? Its been almost seven years

Attached: Confused teacher.png (872x632, 162K)

What does V have to do outside of missions that are so much better than IV's activities?

Gta iv was barebone naked rage engine demo compared to the full package that was V. You are just a seething boomer.

rockstar made some assbone comment about not wanting to release GTA in this "current political climate" but I'm sure when 6 comes out it'll have out of date trump jokes regardless

They are very good at flanking you in pretty much every environment you try to fight them in

GTA V is the first GTA game since III in which police ai don't have the ability to actually arrest peds. Very embarrassing.

Attached: GTA IV vs V cop ai.webm (888x500, 2.7M)

That's because their ai literally teleports homie
Not to mention they are by far the most aggressive cops in the entire series
youtu.be/SDUcoDnsHvI

Then just have it take place in the UK then.

zooooooooommm

Strangers and Freaks
Some of which netted you better heist members.
Races of every type
Stock market
buying cars
car customisation
collectables
mini games like golf and tennis
shooting range challenges
triathalons
flight school
parachuting missions
stunt plane
bail bonds
ground and air trafficking
hunting
wild life photohraphy

But I know what you'll reply to this.
You'll just say
>all boring shit

they do not teleport, you can watch their dots on the minimap the whole time.

it's funny because NYPD and LAPD are both triggerhappy fuckups, so V is more realistic

so much of this game was clearly half assed for the sake of the online and given how successful the game was i doubt we'll ever see a good gta game again
im honestly surprised that rdr2 was as good as it was

>make fun of brexit
>piss people off
trading one problem for another

This is simply a lie. Cant prove it RN but V has most advanced system in this regard. Peds get arrested, handcuffed and put on a side of the road and a prisoner transport comes and gets them.

>But I know what you'll reply to this.
>You'll just say all boring shit

you say that like it's wrong
most of that shit is like a watered down, ass version of the things that were in san andreas

The driving physics in IV are fucking ASS and makes the game unplayable, especially after playing any other GTA game

Like clockwork

They could make fun of the fact that the whole thing is a joke itself

>IV is better!!!
>Cars handle like piss and evey car seems to have really soft suspension

Every fucking time.

well no shit the game is old af

if this is true i have literally never seen this interaction in my life of playing single player V (i mod)

Omg san andreas... The game where content was in 50% just a tutorial for mechanics in the game that were used once in a game and never again. Just recently I tried getting 100% in san andreas and it was so boring, I couldnt stand it and uninstalled the game.
But I got 100% 3 times in V.

GTA IV has just as many if not more "stranger" missions as V. They are just not highlighted on the map, you have to actually find them.
gta.fandom.com/wiki/Random_characters/GTA_IV
>Races of every type
IV had races and the dlc introduced bike races with melee combat, and triathlons
>buying cars
The game is about stealing cars, the fact that you had to buy them in V is a negative aspect retard
>collectables
every single GTA has "collectables" retard, V just added a ton more boring ass ones like having to scour the pointless depths of sea to find nuclear waste or some retarded ass shit like that
>mini games like golf and tennis
Who the fuck asked for these?
>flight school, parachuting missions, stunt plane
This is extra pathetic considering planes are only used in 3 missions and they control worse than in SA
>bail bonds
You mean the 4 non-repeatable "missions" in which you drive to a location, and then drive back to Maude?
>ground and air trafficking
You mean the escort missions that are worse than vigilante, which V doesn't even have?

Watch the video I posted retard, it shows them literally teleporting.

newfags defending IV is almost as bad as newfags that pretend oblivion was ever good

>theyre shit because I say so

okay bub

Pro tip.
Strangers and Freaks in V didnt show up on the map either.
Not untill you got into like a 5m range.
Some were on specific times of day and missable.

Then you have never seen an outcome of those generic ambient cops chases.

Nice excuse for shit AI faggot
You're flat out bullshitting. I already posted this but I will post it again. Fuck off you lying bitch
youtu.be/SDUcoDnsHvI

only hipsters dislike V

Attached: color.jpg (1920x2564, 1.25M)

old game good
new game bad

Attached: 1557320920299.png (465x312, 55K)

>Laser-sight accuracy
yeah, confirmed for selective perception

Still they stay marked on your mini-map, IV was more of an actual random encounter. That's besides the fact anyway, you were the one saying that IV didn't even have stranger missions lol, now that you realize you were wrong you're just moving the goalposts.

It's funny cause the same reasons you fags overrate gta4 is the same reason it and nu-games are worse.

>female bully
dick status: astronomical

You mean random events I think. SaF did show on the map. Either way saf in v were like proper missions, even random events were better in v that strangers in iv.

You're daft mate, or you just haven't played V. They can nail you in the head from an upside down chopper with a handgun.
And before you claim I'm wrong how about you do some research, it's literally coded to be that way and there are multiple mods to fix it.

how dare you say something negative about spending hours just running around collecting shit that doesn't have any influence on the gameplay!!!

GTA IV
>better physics engine

GTA V
>better game

that's not to say GTA V is great, by the way, but GTA IV is an extraordinarily mediocre game

I didn't think it was possible to make killing random peds and outrunning the cops not fun but GTAV found a way.

>"You actually had to find strangers missions in GTAIV"
>"Yeah, its literally the same mechanically in GTAV"
>"NU UH BECAUSE THEY STAY MARKED!"
retard

Can't wait for GTA VI to come out and everyones like "GTA V was the better game"

Just watch any lspdfr video where you are constantly looking at police work. These do happen.

>t. never been to NYC

Why do gamers do this shit all the time. I remember when MGS3 came out and everyone said 2 was better. Now it's 3 better and 4 sucks. Haha

>hurr durr crowbcat
>muh cops that stumble like the three stooges
>muh roads made of butter
>muh roads that are all just a square grid and a traffic filled highway
gta 4 is worse than the ps2 games and everyone complained about it when it came out. saying that 4>5 is a revisionist zoomer opinion

Attached: 1542753951451.jpg (1003x755, 60K)

You were the one who used stranger missions as a plus over IV in the first place lmao. You didn't even know they existed in IV
This doesn't surprise me as everyone who shit-talks IV has hardly played it, if ever.
This whole board is zoomer central that thinks V is better because of "muh graphics", when in reality the whole game is cinematic crap with the worst mechanics out of the entire series.

seriously? i thought all of those ended in shootouts

>implying it doesn't look like super mario oydessy

>calls others zoomers
>"muh roads that are all just a square grid and a traffic filled highway"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 151572086411.gif (190x200, 2.56M)

The second isnt bad lmao

gta iv is boring as fuck though, and the stranger missions are boring as fuck too.

In RDR2 you can punch a guy or get punched to death in front of the sheriff and nothing happens

Nigger that's part of the mod, it's not in the base game retard

Once Subsistence came out I'm pretty sure everyone considered MGS3 to be a highpoint of the series. I'm still mad that I got bamboozled into thinking that MGSV would have the same highs of Naked Snake's campaign.

This is the GTA5 audience, ladies and gentlemen.

Attached: boomer v zoomer.jpg (3840x2160, 2.14M)

gta v is boring as fuck though, and the stranger missions are boring as fuck too.

Car control in 4 was unironically kino. It was really satifying to get a hang of weighty turns, resulting in more skillful play as you take corners at the right speeds. Meanwhile in 5 cars don't even feel like they are attached to the ground, they've got zero weight or feel to them.

People with differing opinions are faggots, 5 is objectively worse.

I'm not the same guy faggot
just pointin out your retardation

yeah look at that varied landscape and road. you've got:
>square grids
>kinda square grids
>highways
show me a clip of you driving anywhere in that game above 40mph and being able to make a turn without spinning out. you can't. it's a tech demo that relied too much on a janky physics engine.

Attached: GTA_IV_radarmap.png (900x573, 272K)

Does it strike anyone else as odd that V fags spam the word "zoomer" in an attempt to criticize IV fags, while in reality V is one of the most zoomer games of all time?

Attached: 15457887.gif (236x224, 1.89M)

stay mad

Reality is, future GTA's will be like V and not IV

Just because iv lookslike shit when oversaturated, doesnt mean it looks better by default than v, pleb. Its just that nothing can help iv other than pc mods.

>"just pointin out your retardation"
Well you did a shit job retard

go play a racing sim and get back to me faggot.
sedans shouldn't handle like they weigh 10,000 lbs and their wheels are made of butter.
also compare the driving in 5 to any of the ps2 games, it's supposed to be arcadey, not a boaty shitfest.

lol git gud

Attached: gta4driveby.webm (640x360, 2.91M)

Walking around in V and find a basketball court. No ball to be found anywhere. Wait around and realize nobody ever comes and uses the court either. Just an empty shell of a game. A boring ass sandbox. Gta3 was the last great one with vice city just building on that. 4 and 5 were cash ins that brought nothing great

boomers don't like gta 4
they like the ps2 games
stay mad poser

Attached: 1550534545496.jpg (600x600, 69K)

>spouts shit
>gets called out on it
>spouts more shit
>gets called out on it
>"y-youre the retard!"
kek

>driving anywhere in that game above 40mph and being able to make a turn without spinning out
you missed some real shit if you never did supercar races online in gta 4

>Does it strike anyone else as odd that V fags spam the word "zoomer"
Except its the other way around. IV tards call V fans zoomers, while they themselves are zoomers who never played IV and dont know how shitty it was so they cant compare it to V. But they think that calling an older game better would make them look like non zoomers.

>show me a clip of you driving anywhere in that game above 40mph and being able to make a turn without spinning out. you can't.
Not my vid but here you go. And you're beyond retarded to be complaining about the layout of the map considering it's based on New York City.
Funny considering 40% of V's map is literal empty, unused mountain space that I bet you love because you can zoom fast in your chrome adder.

Attached: GTA IV driving 2.webm (640x360, 2.85M)

No, boomers like the GTA2 up to GTA IV. 1 is shit and V is shit.
Cope zoomer

Attached: bluebanshee.png (800x600, 772K)

woah dude you were going like 40mph before you had to slam on the brakes to make a slight turn!
and at the end there where you made a sharp right going 20 and burned rubber because no cars have ABS or traction control?? just like real life!
man that's satisfying!

>turn left
>car lifts 15 inches
>turn right
>car lifts 15 inches

This is not how cars work.

>i called you out nd u say no u
scram dumb nigger

GTA IV cars were the bees knees

>traction control and ABS affect the handbrake

Attached: 1553597933676.png (703x911, 19K)

It's weird how these two games get compared as if they came out at the same time.
GTA V is a sequel.
I'll say it again: GTA V is A FUCKING SEQUEL, it came out AFTER GTA IV
This means every little thing that GTA IV did better has a lot more weight than the little things that GTA V did better

It's a goddamn sequel that for every step forward takes two steps back.

This looks so slow and boring. Also looks like the car has a 10ton weight on its roof or something

Whip a corvette down a winding road at 90 mph and then get back to me

At what part of my post did I claim anything about realism? lmao fucking goal post moving faggot. 4 is more fun to play, I don't give a shit about realism.

>not playing GTA V exclusively for American Cop Simulatorâ„¢

Attached: gta-5-lspdfr-police-mod-372-city-of-miami-police-department-automatic-license-plate-reader-miami-vid (1280x720, 410K)

look at the road maybe sweetie and tell me if its flat or not

but webm related is fun right

Attached: gta5.webm (640x360, 2.86M)

the car you showed is supposed to be a dodge viper. it's barely going 70mph and is clearly all over the road just because of a few slight turns. it's so fucking boaty.
a REAL viper can go 130+ through bullshit turns like that and not even have half the amount of weight shift.
never post that webm again.

V was called shit since day 1, retard.

You just ousted yourself

not talking about fun, but it does look quicker

Oh god I remember seeing this same faggot with the same webm with the same argument months back. Let it fucking go you autist.

yeah bro it's totally impossible for a car to go fast in a straight line. you got me!

>complaining about 4's body roll with physics when 5 has no physics at all and the cars handle like soulless toys

Is that "hot-wheels racing"?

It's not quicker. Both games top out at the same speed. V just doesn't apply any physics to your car so you can freecam around at top speed even if you have cerebral fucking palsy, which is a good thing for the V audence.
Driving hard need driving easy to grind crate

Attached: gta4tampa.webm (640x360, 1.82M)

Making a 20 degree turn at 90mph shouldn't compress suspension nearly that much

GTA IV is and always will be better than that crap named GTA V

>the handbrake
in real like you don't need a handbrake to take a 90 degree turn at 20mph.
post a better wojak edit next time faggot.

Obviously I'm not arguing that it's 100% realistic you fool, the point is that it's much more fun than V's arcade crap

it's a dodge

Your first mistake is that you genuinely think I'm arguing in favor of realism. I'm not. I know IV is unrealistic in the driving department, it's just genuinely more fun/satisfying than V, which I think is far to arcadey/easy.

look at the fucking weight shift and how shit the car turns at the end. embarrassing that you're trying to prove a point with that.

>my first GTA was 4

>much more fun because the car goes up and down a little

Wow sure fucking shown me user.

just because that's how the webm took the turn doesnt make it the most optimal way to take the turn faggot
is that something easymode V kiddies struggle to understand

Not that guy but it looks better than V, where the car turns on a dime.

Can you imagine the levels of kino we'd have with a mix of both? 4 was a bit too heavy but 5 was just floaty garbage. Shame it'll never happen, normies don't want any skill based driving what so ever.

I could never get mine to work properly.

SA > VC > IV > III > V

Attached: 7888.png (422x357, 161K)

>arbitrarily sluggish driving
>fun
yeah bro just pop the tires! just play using your feet! you're not skilled enough to play like I do!

>Whip a corvette down a winding road at 90 mph and then get back to me
Seems like you're trying to argue about realism but I guess real life corvettes handle like an arcade racer so my bad dude

>V the worst
>when it's the closest to San Andreas in terms of gameplay

>sluggish
no user, the problem is that you are sluggish
literally git gud

Dont give up user, it's too much fun

Why are you getting so upset? I prefer the over-exaggerated suspension over no suspension at all, no reason to get so pissed.

>when it's the closest to San Andreas in terms of gameplay
I agree with that, but i still cant enjoy this game so much like others
t.25y

yes. as every hardcore gta iv player knows the most optimal way to take a turn is to slow down to a realistic 10mph before even thinking about turning the car at all. then you'll only get a liiiiittle bit of fishtailing while your rear tires burn out. it's fun that way though!

A question for the GTA IV fags: do you prefer to drive your cars with the keyboard or with a controller?

VICE CITY 2

ICE CREAM TRUCK BOOGALOO

>V closest to SA in terms of gameplay
Christ, from someone who's played every game in the series multiple times... you could not be more wrong.
You should be fucking embarrassed

t. placed last in IV multiplayer races
faggots like you were like 30 seconds behind me and then complained the driving was slow lmao

controller by far, IV heavily relies on analog braking/acceleration

how the fuck do you drive in any GTA with a keyboard

this is the opinion of retarded man

Dumb zoomer, we all know you're just bad at it and prefer V because it's designed for literal retards

still waiting to see what it looks like when someone "gits gud"
all I've seen are lame ass webms of people going almost the speed limit in a straight line while trying not to flip the boat they're in.

>someone who's a fan of meteorology.

so you're a homosexual?

People have been talking about how IV's multiplayer races were, obviously you've never experienced them.

Cars flip more in V more than IV. So much so they had to add the "steer to flip your car back onto its wheels" feature
Cope zoomer

nope. corvettes handle like they do in a sim racer. corvettes in gta iv handle like a minivan that weighs 8 tons with butter for wheels

never recorded my games but I'll say it again you missed some real shit if you never did the supercar races in gta 4 online

>Cops N Crooks
>Races
These 2 modes were better than the entirety of V's multiplayer

this is your brain on ultra zoom

yeah all you can do keep talking about them because they don't exist anymore. the game is a fucking snoozefest and more people are playing San Andreas still than that shitheap.

when i was younger every game was fun, but now i just cant stand gta V, its just soulless to me
now i play more action games like edf, sekiro, dmc or ace combat so maybe this is a reason

Because games have been getting objectively worse you idiots. It is perfectly possible for IV to be better than V and for V to be better than VI. retards

see

That has nothing to do with what you were arguing?
Sounds like you're just so butthurt that you're resorting to calling IV's mp dead, which isn't even an insult but just a fact lol

it looks like fucking trackmania faggot

We were arguing the quality of the games, not which one has more active multiplayer you dumb fucking zoomer

Attached: Tom Cruise 4.jpg (500x333, 35K)

>dude it was so good!
>so good that nobody plays anymore!
try again

>more people are playing San Andreas still than that shitheap.
wow great """argument"""...

stay mad, no other gta is gonna be like 4 again because it was a rushed tech demo.

Do you know how many god-tier multiplayer games that could apply to user?
The fact that you really are resorting to this is a testament to how shit your opinion is lmao
Or just proof that you're legitimately under-aged

not that guy i still remember GTA IV races, if people didnt spin out at the beginning they would spin out halfway trough or suicide drive into you the second round, the fact that a gush of wind could oversteer your car did not help
im no fan of GTA V physics either but 4 wasnt any better

whatever helps you sleep at night

Imagine being an autist and getting triggered by another autist

VI should have:

Gunplay of IV
Features of V
Story of SA
The classiness of III

please share with me some God tier multiplayer games that sold more than 25 million copies but the online was dead 5 years later. I'll wait.

nice comeback

show me one that lasted longer that wasn't populated by chinks

apparently it was or else you wouldn't be upset enough to reply

Attached: Steve.jpg (453x500, 33K)

literally what?
if chinks were still playing gta iv there'd at least be someone else to race in your God tier multiplayer game. but there's not. sorry pal.

get a life

Attached: 1520260908058.jpg (477x453, 33K)

>dead 5 years later
IV's multiplayer actually didn't die out until just recently after recent PC updates, and there still is people playing on Xbone.
Rockstar basically sabotaged IV in favor of V's mp, and the reason it is so much more populated is because it's a model deliberately designed to attract waves of children, like fortnite

haha dude made me reply :)

>"get a life"
He says as he posts some random average asian skank that he saved for god knows why

Attached: 1558595763112.gif (424x382, 1.44M)

>they sabatoged iv by making v a better game!
>it's not fair!!!
>how come nobody appreciates roads made out of butter besides esteemed gentlemen like me!?

you must not have a life if you replied

it's 10 years old and the PC port was shit, of course it's empty

Are you illiterate? I meant "sabotaged" in terms of updates for IV that literally broke the multiplayer.
I thought that would've been clear but I forgot I was dealing with retards

Same to you, punk ass BITCH

c
Hey V kiddies, how about you back up your dogshit opinions with a City Slicking time.

Go on. Boot up SA. Get a time that's at least faster than 81 seconds, I booted SA and did this in about 3 tries without really paying attention.

Because I know for a fact that the faggots who bitch about IV driving behind hard are the EXACT same faggots who bitched about City Slicking being hard, the rest of driving school being hard, and The Driver in VC being hard.

Prove me wrong.
I know you can't, because you fucking dipshit V zoomers haven't even played SA, nevermind actually having it installed.

Attached: cs.jpg (800x600, 119K)

>it was the PC updates that did it
>but Xbone still has players! (literally who?)
>gta V is more attractive
are you illiterate?
What did the PC updates do to kill the game? make the cars not handle like shit on wheels?

Fuck if I know, they just broke the damn multiplayer for me like 2 updates ago. There are still people playing on pc but you have to have a specific version of the game or run through IV:MP, like SA:MP.
Like I said, the fact that you're resorting to whining about player-count on multiplayer as a measurement of actual quality, is very embarrassing.

You know damn well that all these V fags have no clue what you are even talking about

Ballad of Gay Tony was fantastic. When Yusef shows up in his little bird at the end when you are going to the airport was the best fucking scene in any GTA.

all your replies were to me but I'm not gonna do shit because I'm in bed. maybe you can show off those times to your speedrunning tranny girlfriend, loser.

But which one is more fun? I feel like the GTA 4 Physics make the combat more fun. And the driving more interesting. But I also feel like GTA 5 has more fun in terms of missions and side activities., That being said the lack of replayable taxi/vigilantee/firefighter/icecream truck/race missions is a bit sad. I feel like I'm looking at a candy store getting less and less variety as time passes, game should get more features not replace them, especially if no one asked for it, because I doubt anyone ever said, you know what, those side missions from the old games shouldn't make it in.

Attached: 1536698216461.gif (500x281, 522K)

I'm just saying if it's so good and it sold over 25 mil someone out there should still be playing. but there's not. it's a snoozefest.

No, you're not gonna do shit because you don't own or never have even played SA

V's map is boring as fuck. Most of it is samey city area, and then a lifeless barren rural area to the north.

>Can't even beat city slicking
lmao thats what i thought faggot
pathetic

Honestly what's the point of webms like this?

oh no lemme go prove myself to an anonymous poster on the internet! I can't be shamed publicly like this!!!
San Andreas is top 3 games for me and iv was a huge letdown and I'll never like it.

go play fortnite for your colours stupid zoomer

And I'm just saying there is no solid way to even play the game anymore. Xbone and 360 still have a small amount of players.
PC had a good community until Rockstar fucked it with updates.
You keep spamming that it's a "snoozefest", V is a fuck-fest of little kids and microtransactions.
No fucking wonder it's almost as popular as Fortnite.
For the last time I could give a shit about player-count, it's not an accurate measurement of quality unless you're a fool.

How can SA be in your top 3 if you've never played it?

You might be genuinely disabled if you honestly can't tell

>200 posts 55 IP's

Attached: mvVsAdv.gif (420x211, 3.98M)

So "grey bad" is GTA's "sun bad"?

People in multiplayer would message me telling me how good a driver I was in GTA4. felt good. Cops and Robbers was a lot of fun.

>It's not quicker. Both games top out at the same speed.
absolute fucking bullshit
you can't look at the literal rocket cars of It's not quicker. Both games top out at the same speed. and say the cars in IV are the same "top speed"

>be the only faggot in the lobby who knows how to drive
>salty annihilatorfags seething they cant keep up as im dipping through alleyways and dodging traffic
sad that v kiddies will never know this feeling

Vice City > all

>All the V kiddies nowhere to be found after this post

Attached: 1552283931245.jpg (618x679, 85K)

The cars in 4 felt like they were driving on black ice the whole time, 5 does driving way way way better

ITT kids who grew up without an xbox 360/ps3 arguing with people who had them

Go dilate

gta 4 was your first gta

Your both cancer for playing GTA multiplayer, The HD games suck ass

it's the same thread as the last hundred times and it has the same posters as the last hundred times

Beats the autism over on GTAF

Driving is perfectly fine you're just shit at it

I second this, so I can go to the muzzie quarter and kill every single one

Don't forget about getting wanted levels that last fucking ages, for shooting with a silenced weapon at birds in the middle of the desert. GTAV cucks will defend this

>he loves V's Hot Wheels physics

Attached: noice 3.png (342x160, 119K)

Fuck off, us boomers like Vice City

Anyone play GTAV RP?

But GTA IV is still horribly boring and empty. San Andreas is leagues better.

>Low speed turn
>Car goes up on 2 wheels and nearly flips
Is there a GTAIV mod that puts all the sway bars back on the cars? I like occasionally driving at double digit speeds in these games.

Both of you are proving him right. Neither of this clips show cars being able to turn corners without of the environment, NPC vehicles, or slamming on the brakes. The turning circle for cars in this games cruise liners look easily manoeuvrable

Question, do you know what a "turn" is. You meandered slightly to the left and almost fishtailed out of control.

Um excuse me, I think you're missing something. Let me remind you

I didn't say IV was hard, I said it was shit.
And I never "installed" SA because I played it when it was released, and not years later when it got memed back into popularity.

unironically correct.

Yep, couldn't git gud at IV and never played SA.
As expected.

>Thinking the driving in IV was good
>Thinking the driving in SA was hard
God you're bad at this.

>was good
Not was. Is.
>was hard
Not was. Is.
The fact you speak in past tense as if these games don't exist anymore shows just how little your opinion is worth.

Attached: gtasabullet.webm (480x360, 1.11M)

>car rams your bumper
>car pulls to the right everytime
Thanks for reminding me why I stopped playing GTA V.

Now now user, get with the times, gotta get read for the DRM only future, where games die once the companies stop supporting them.

Attached: 1555655104153.jpg (689x1023, 69K)

>GTA SA is hard
It's only hard for you because it's not optimized for your shitty PC. Shame you never got to play it on original hardware kid.

God I hate those fucking YouTube videos.

Oh no, user, it isn't hard for me.
But it's hard for you. Otherwise you would have posted a city slicking time. But you can't, because you're bad, or you don't have SA.

You already admitted you find it hard.
>>was hard
>Not was. Is.

Sorry, but I don't think your screenshot of your city slicking time went through. You DID post a city slicking time, didn't you user? It has to be a technical error, because nobody could REALLY be this much of a faggot, I mean wouldn't that be funny, haha

All y'all retards except for me

Attached: 1527461180541.png (426x402, 16K)

Enlighten us, oh prometheus user. What is the truely based opinion?

Attached: 1552556892786.gif (270x270, 499K)

>make police competent in a game featuring a black man
they dodged a bullet there.

>I say thing therefore it's true

gta4 is fucking shit. you're a delivery boy 80% of the time and theres only about 4 good missions.

i just wish the helicopters controlled in 5 like they did in 4

Those chips look dry, want some water?

all women are objects, because an object is anything that occupate a place in the universe, even living things.

Not mineral I hope.

Attached: 1536698216461.gif (473x267, 996K)

Then so are men, and horses, actually if you think about it, 2D images on the internet don't really fit the bill in that case, thus, 2D Women are the only women that one should not objectify.

Attached: 1552556892787.gif (500x281, 908K)