>Good game
>Decided to re-play it
>Think about how I never got 100% in it
>Try to get 100%
>It's so tedious it made me delete the game and not even finish the main story
Why is it that way? I could get 100% in V (3 times), VC, TBOGT, IV, but getting 100% in SA feels like last stage cancer.
bloated missions, not helped by the fact that it aged like milk. still aged better than VC, you're just a pleb
>bloated
In what sense?
>still aged better than VC, you're just a pleb
But I finished VC a long time ago, not recently.
>In what sense?
VC had 66 main missions
TBOGT had 26 main missions
IV had 88 main missions
V had 69 main missions
SA had fucking 104. It gets tiring after a while.
Bu I never had problems with SA main storyline. It's the 100% that is horendeous to get. For example, the vigilante missions. They were much more fun in VC, IV... also they are extremely difficult in SA.
Tired gamers please fuck off. I replay San Andreas all the time as it's the best open world game ever.
>100% in V (3 times)
100% or just main storyline?
You are a weak-willed bitch is why
git autism
the reason for san andreas being so full of content is because it was made in era where single player games were released complete. theres no content patches and no updates or dlc. so of course it will fell bloated.
What SP content updates did V have?
Wait TBOGT only had 26 main missions? Didn't TLAD have like 30?
Try to 100% RDR2 without a guide and fill the compendium 100% now that's a challenge
Half the game feels like a tutorial for mechanics which are used once and never needed again.
I've 100% GTA SA several times now. Might even make another playthrough sometime. My favorite part is the 100 taxi fares bit. I just put on my custom track and drive all over town. The best part is you get a nice reward for every activity. Like the nitro on all the taxies.
it didnt get any because the game went full multiplayer focus. but IV is a better example with its expansions.
But IV was built on a new engine. Of course it's going to be stripped to bones compared to SA. Look at GTA III.
Most open worlds have their share of tedious busywork to get 100%. It's a downside of the genre.
Also, as pointed out, SA is far too long for it's own good, especially considering that not all of the missions are good.
100% is autism
TLAD has around 20 I think TBOGT is slightly longer
you have shit taste my dude
>100%ing games that have no achievements
What good are e-penises when no one sees them
EY PAY A NIGGA
>vigilante missions
Steal a rhino tank from area 69 and do the missions with that, ez
Back then you still got in game unlockables instead of achievements
mammaaas don't let your babies grow up to be cowboys
I love the game but I still think it has the worst missions in the series. Most of them are really boring and pretty tedious. There are only a handful of missions I would say are actually good. Most of them are a real chore.
Strongly disagree as V has the worst missions.
I would say, not even close. Most missions in V were at least moderately enjoyable. Whereas in SA, almost every mission fucking sucked and I dread playing them.
the fuck?