JRPG ends

You can start a new save file dumbass.
The tears in rain quote applies to an android's memories being deleted. You can't play the game again with fresh eyes but you can play it again.

He wasn't a robot retard, he was flesh and blood.

>You can start a new save file dumbass.
It's not the same.

Replicants are not androids and his memories weren't being deleted, his life time was up.

That's because they're shallow, and designed to allow people to project whatever they want onto them. Congratulations, you've been ruined as a human being.

Attached: 1347892859025.jpg (247x200, 8K)

This. Real world doesn't have anything worthwhile anymore. You know shit is up when "normies" aren't even getting off their asses and hanging out with friends.

THIS.

Deckard being a replicant would destroy the whole message of the movie.

This got too real all of a sudden.

Attached: 1554839393135.jpg (720x960, 66K)

Nigger go read the book instead. The movie can be interpreted any way you want because it's not that well thought-out.

>That's because they're shallow
If being "deep" means being a cunt with a shitty history then you can keep it.

This is definitely true for me too, though most jrpg endings are still bittersweet.

No, but it's real. Real people aren't deep either, I don't think there's a dichotomy here. You've probably had bad experiences. Or you think people are cunts when they don't act like you want. Either way, preferring the company of idealistically realized empty vessels of your projection to actual people is escapism, which is not inherently a bad thing, as long as you understand its limits.

Don't cry because it's over; smile because it happened. Basic bitch

>You've probably had bad experiences
As opposed to what?

Everyone has met cunts in their life. Most people alive are cunts.Why would I willingly choose real life over fiction?

>b-but some people are good and worth it!
No one is worth wading through shit for. That's a retarded mentality. "Oh yeah bro just deal with complete faggots 99% of the time so that 1% you can find a cool guy".

its better to be alone than in bad company. but you wouldnt understand that, because you are a cookie cutter normie who needs apporval and validation from your "friends". real men dont need anybody but a whore and buisness associates in their life... time to learn to be a man, user. you're not in highschool anymore.

tfw always quit a game before the final boss.

Yo what the fuck I'm rewatching Lost right now

this is so true, I was recommended by people to use the emulator option to speed things up when playing Skies of Arcadia on Dolphin, after thinking how much I was going to use that feature, I just decided to stop playing it, JRPGs have absolutely no respect for your time with constant inane bullshit

I'm sorry you feel that way user. I'm sure there's nothing I can say to convince you.

I find it funny you need me to be a certain way in order to categorically reject everything about me. I certainly never said it would be better to be in bad company than in the company of fantasy. I did say that preferring fictional company to real people is escapism. If a real man only needs a whore and business associates, it sounds we agree on that, at least.

Back when Yea Forums was good and the biggest evil was ABATAP.

why call it escapism when it dosnt escape you from anything? it should be called coping, thats what it actually is. and unless you have a better alternative, i suggest you stop cope-shaming people. if i looked into anybody's life i bet you anything i could find multiple copes.

That's a fair point, actually. I certainly have my share of copes. And I recognize what they do for me, and what they don't do for me; the ways in which a crutch can become a burden, or a burden a strength, and therefore, they help me grow to be a better person. Which, sometimes, means I need to stop simply coping and do something more.

You cope with a disability, you don't choose to be disabled because it's hard to not be retarded.

>You cope with a disability
Yes, and our disability is not being able to be around other people without wanting to die

its actually pretty easy to be retarded, just go outside and look around at the "people" out there. you can tell just by looking at most people how devolved they are. not just physically, but mentally and spiritually. id rather just stay in my room when im not at work.

Don't forget your umbrellas boys.

Attached: FMA_rain_6856.jpg (350x197, 10K)

Could this be a clue?

I don't believe YOU can tell anything about a person by looking at them without projecting your expectations. Not to say you're wrong, but thinking like this only has one conclusion if you're not prepared challenge yourself to be wrong.

>as long as you understand its limits.
Fuck that, go all the way to the finish line. I almost killed myself a month back, but I realised that now that I have accepted the consequences of death I shouldn't worry about any of the mediocre stuff like friends or outside. There's nothing in this world for me, so I should just continue with the stuff I like and see it to the end.

thats where you're wrong, im trained in tcm and a unique form of resistance stretching and i can tell from a physical standpoint that the fascial lines i ntheir body are extremeely tight and stagnated. fascia holds toxins, and trauma. if you know anything about "generational trauma", it can be directly linked to tension patterns being passed down to the children. its the same reason why "the alcohol gene" gets passed down, its not a gene its a tension pattern. all fascial lines connect to every organ and every cell in your body. think of them as power circuits. these are called miridians. in tcm, they can be called shu points or energy points. if you get bob cooley's book on resistance stretching, some of the physical stuff i described is in there. he used to run a cult of sorts. may sound like horse hockey, but what im offering is a chance to investigate it for yourself, as opposed to listening to a bunch of jewish sponsored scientists who are collaborating with big government.

>JRPG ends
>feel nothing because I couldn't get involved or emotionally invested in these cheap anime cliches

>finish Gradius on arcade difficulty
>well up in tears as I see the end credits

youtube.com/watch?v=DsNGesu8g5I

This hit me harder than every JRPG I've ever played.

Attached: sighing-1007200328-650x450.jpg (650x450, 80K)

When I was a child I stopped playing a game right when I was about to hit the last boss because I didn't want it to end.

Bullseye

Attached: 1400469162940.gif (680x489, 14K)

That's actually extremely interesting, gonna look into it. However, I feel like this reinforces what I said earlier, since you describe an undesirable state of being. Moreover it doesn't begin to disprove my claim that you're just projecting, it might just mean you're projecting really hard. Furthermore, the case being as you suggest I claim again you would want to do something more about it than simply coping.

exactly

Hit me with some Stirner-isms pls.

I get the general gist of his philosophy but I need bullet points to help it sink in.

Part of the journey is the end, faggot.

The end is the worst part.

Look at this retarded faggot.

You got it user. I'll make a few posts with some basic Stirner philosophy, let me just find the Ego and His Own (highly recommended, but make sure you get the version with tons of footnotes or you'll have no clue what's happening)

Firstly: Egoism is good, but do NOT confuse Stirner's Ego with Freud's, or with that of eastern philosophy and religion. Basically, Stirner's point is that all of our actions stem from egoism, that there is no such thing as altruism or selflessness, the former being delusion and the latter self-destruction. If I want to help another person I am not being selfless or altruistic, I'm doing it because I want to be a good person - I'm doing what *I* want.

There is no "ought" - no fixed idea - on which to get stuck. Those that do have Wheels in the Head. A free thinker, an egoist, will always be able to change their mind. It doesn't mean they are free of fixed ideas - believing oneself to "be a certain way" is a spook - a remnant of a fixed idea.

Attached: 1529144543967.jpg (402x431, 35K)

Spooks are those ideas that do not in fact describe the parts that make it - humanity is a spook, individuals are reality.

Attached: 1529142001899.png (450x450, 273K)

Property - all things are my property. They are a property of me. The world is mine, and I will do what I will with what is mine. What is in my power, is mine. All things are nothing to me ("Ich hab mein sache auf nicht gestellt")

Attached: 1529141555001.jpg (480x359, 35K)

There's a bunch of stuff about the Christian culture and Jewish culture, which I frankly can't recall the point of. It does sound like he valued something about Christianity (Jesus was an Egoist, who annihilated the status quo - comparable to Nietzschean ubermensch possibly)

In general there's an interesting similarity of thought to Nietzsche, but Nietzsche was vastly more accomplished and overall a deeper, more educated thinker, however he apparently vehemently denied having read The Ego and His Own.

Attached: 1529140725677.jpg (390x310, 17K)

Much like Nietzsche, incidentally, Stirner's love life was apparently pretty cringe. Stirner was married twice, and allegedly freaked the fuck out when he was his second wife naked. Nietzsche was cucked by his friend, then asked the girl to marry him. When she refused he fled the country and wrote Thus Spake Zarathustra.

Attached: 1529142639240.png (386x520, 37K)

Stirner is often used as a tool to support anarchism, but I found in reading his works it sounds more like he was just anti-statist. In a sense, he does very much deny that higher authority should be able to determine an individual's value or choices, but his philosophy also leaves open the possibility of choosing to accept the powers stronger than oneself for any number of reasons of one's egoistical choosing, whereas most (modern) anarchy would like you to say that any form of authority is wrong, despite the fact that this in itself is a form of authoritative direction, and therefore hypocritical (a spook in Stirner's eyes).

Politically, Stirner is pretty primitive - essentially, might makes right. In his egoist, realist view, the guy with the gun makes the rules. Since, for an egoist, no idealistic or dogmatic goal could be used for its own sake - only for the benefits an egoistic may choose to extract - the only guarantee of power is force.

Attached: 1529140335838.jpg (960x800, 50K)

>being this autistic

>like tears in rain
more like fart in the wind

Ultimately, do what you want. Do as you will, for everything is permitted (to paraphrase another similar thinker).

Stirner is one of those thinkers whose ideas are essentially obvious and can't readily be denied, but the conclusions he drew from how he thought is more meme-worthy than useful.

I think that's enough for my Stirner-posting. I have to admit it's been many years since I read the Ego and His Own and I don't remember as much as I thought. As far as German philosophy goes it's a pretty light read, and I'd warmly recommend it.

Attached: 1529144143956.jpg (750x534, 43K)

One last rare Stirner

Attached: tsundere stirner.jpg (640x640, 25K)

Anyway Stirner has nothing on my main man Diogenes

Attached: diogenes.jpg (1024x752, 190K)

Shit I had more Stirners

Attached: 1405085976891.png (1017x709, 76K)

You're a member of the 99% cunt statistic. Most people naturally gravitate towards people they share interests with. Your problem is the people that'd share your interests are other antisocial faggots like you

I might be autistic but I don't not finish RPGs because then the journey is never over and I never have to say goodbye.

Also I consider my first run against the final boss to be the canon ending. So if I lose the hero lost and the world is doomed.

Shining force, I understand.

Attached: 2424.jpg (780x439, 72K)

So this is the power of feels, eh? Not bad...

Attached: 1494259781300.gif (500x273, 1011K)