>For many months now Japanese, Chinese, and South Korean developers have had to tiptoe around an amorphous set of rules opaquely employed by Valve regarding what sort of games are allowed on the Steam storefront. Valve has been using the term “child exploitation” to axe anime style games from mostly smallish Asian studios whenever they feature sexy or attractive female characters in romantic settings that some of Valve’s staff consider to be inappropriate. This is despite the fact that some of these games are the all-ages version and don’t contain any sex or flagrant nudity. Well, Valve completely forewent that curation standard for Dontnod Entertainment’s Life Is Strange 2: Episode 3, which featured an underage sex scene, which featured nudity.
>The sequence doesn’t contain explicit nudity such as genitalia, but we do get to see some of Sean’s butt as he’s getting into the water, Cassidy’s butt and her breasts, as well as both Sean and Cassidy topless during the sex scene.
>However, the real story here is that the depiction of underage sex also went unchecked by both Sony and Valve, two platform holders who have been aggressively enforcing censorship and bans on games that they either deem as containing too much “sexual content” or for containing “child exploitation”.
Steam Must be Forced to Live by It's own Rules
Other urls found in this thread:
>this thread has been pruned or deleted
I wouldn't wish censorship on anyone. That said, it is unfair that mostly Japanese games are being targeted. In Sony's case, each game they censored was already approved for mature audiences by CERO.
It's literally okay when the west does it and it's only going to get worse from here thanks to liberals.
Fair. Fair. But consider this. OP Must be Forced to Suck our Dicks.
saying the scene features nudity is pretty fucking generous when there's zero naughty bits actually shown. they're naked in a lake. then they go back to their tent and fuck, and the game just cuts around with awkward camera angles and nothing that resembles say, a porn scene. it's more like a mass effect romance scene.
not surprised incels don't get it
sex here is just a way to represent character intimacy, it never tries to give you a boner so stop acting like it's the same as your cowtit cartoons existing for the sole purpose of becoming content to jerk off
What the fuck is wrong with having a boner? Nothing.
>sex never tries to give you a boner
The absolute state of Yea Forums.
the willful misrepresentation of how life is strange contextualizes its sex scene to equalize it to say, scantily clad lolis in huniepop, is ridiculous to anyone who spends even a minute investigating both cases.
Fucking this
>replying
He used the word incel, that should be enough to know the kind of post it is. therefore, you should just ignore
Hell, it'd be better to just filter some shit
Does Yea Forums endorse pedophilia, mass murder, and terrible taste in weeaboo video games?
Fuck you OP.
Oh boy, they're already here.
I can bet my dick they will be on the hunt of these threads 24/7 to shit them up.
Lol eat shit you lolipedos, fuck yal and your shitty degenerate art style.
Have sex
>cp is only bad if it's anime
>by it is own rules
into the trash it goes
the point is that the life is strange scene isn't porn. it's sex, but it is like said, the game doesn't try to depict the sex graphically and it's more of a moment of intimacy between two characters to advance their relationship as compared to titillation.
More like
>thread achieves bump limit
>none of the flamewar shitposts got deleted
The real question is: Is it going to get better or worse in the period of 2019-2020?
>underage characters have sex
This is fine
>Girls in bikinis
REEEEE CENSOR THIS FILTH BURN IT ALL
You have more mental issues than shut-in NEETs
That scene looks like a SFM animation what the fuck
They're underage. Doesn't matter what kinda sex is depicted. Stop being an actual pedo.
why can't you admit that the presentation is different.
>the game doesn't try to depict the sex graphically and it's more of a moment of intimacy between two characters to advance their relationship as compared to titillation
Why does that distinction matter?
The same reason Michelangelo's David is in a museum while most people would never admit to even watching porn.
The hell you mean "forced"
because there's clearly two different intents by the developers. that is the point being made. it's true that both are sexualizing minors, but one is doing in a way that is designed to titillate while the other is not.
It surprises me that you haven't noticed the blatant samefagging.
Remember there are report functions.
are you fucking new here?
those are the 3 pillars of Yea Forums
>that dialogue
is this what white people find sexy?
artistic nudity is a meme
Not saying to do it or anything... (You have to click the little flag)
>Underage sex
>Underage girls wearing clothes they wear in real life
They are different. One is underage sex, the other isn't
Why can't you admit your priorities are all manner of fucked?
>one is doing in a way that is designed to titillate while the other is not
And?
No, its what trannies think intimacy is like.