I haven't seen an argument for why Sekiro is bad, and normally when I ask I literally never get a reply back

I haven't seen an argument for why Sekiro is bad, and normally when I ask I literally never get a reply back.

Why hate it when it topped Dark Souls and Bloodborne and is From-Software's best work?

Stop with this blatant fanboyism Yea Forums and accept the facts

Attached: 1557987203121.jpg (1278x1087, 411K)

It’s bad because this is Yea Forums and everything’s bad

You're not fooling anyone BBfag.

Even Zelda?

Honestly I didn't get that far in because the difficulty felt "forced" and it wasn't in a fun way like bb or ds3 where you have options.

Sekiro fights were very scripted, you were supposed to attack in a very scripted manner and dodge in a similar scripted manner. The bosses attacked in a set pattern and you were just expected to memorize their attack pattern and abuse it, it wasn't entertaining or fun. It being "hard" because you died instantly wasn't an enjoyable form of difficulty either because combine that with the first issue, and the fact most bosses were meat sponges meant it was just an exercise in tedium rather than skill.

[/spoiler]_no[/spoiler]

The fuck did I do wrong?

There is no argument beyond "exclusive good, multiplat bad".

I don't think it's bad, I just didn't like it as much as Dark Souls (1, that is).

All difficulty, no satisfaction.