What does Yea Forums think about the Darksiders games?

What does Yea Forums think about the Darksiders games?
Worth buying on a sale?

Attached: image.jpg (1920x1080, 339K)

If you can afford them, run them and you enjoy games like that then yes.

I played the first game, don't know about the other games. I wouldn't really recommend it. It's not broken, but there's nothing really special about it. Servicable combat, puzzles and tools aren't very interesting, forgettable story, and it tries too hard to be edgy.

1>2
3 can suck a dick

Attached: 1543917977608.jpg (470x500, 203K)

3 is the best tho

3 >>> 2 > 1 in combat (but 2 has retarded diabloot)
3 >>>>> 1 > 2 in exploration (3 has a tight connected world and no retarded Zelda puzzles in every room)
2 > 3 > 1 in content and characters

3 has combat similar to final fantasy XV.

You hold the button to attack. Which is lame.

So fucking good they released an update to play like DS1, 3 is the worst Darksiders, specially with the shit chink tier character design.

Attached: 1244884-darksiders_fury.jpg (720x1106, 299K)

2 is in my top10 games
1 is ok
3 is shit

>You hold the button to attack. Which is lame.
They changed it to be more akin to the other two Darksiders.

>But-t we are dark souls now

Attached: darksiders-3-fury-feat.jpg (1920x1080, 3.29M)

Of course you're a fucking incel.

I want Fury to give me a titjob

yeah, best at sucking dicks

virgin

Really fun games, I love the "comic book" aesthetic they have. Feels like edgy 80-90's pulp fiction.
In terms of gameplay alone they're above average at best, but as a whole package they're just fun little experiences. They don't expect too much of you and you don't expect too much of them. Just fun, edgy romps through a post-apocalyptic world.

I liked them. I've never thought they were good, but they've got that sort of appealingly B tier design to them. Where none of the rough edges have been sanded off, but the skill is still there.

Tried playing the third, my computer cannot run it. Judging by the intro cinematic, they went a bit overboard in establishing Fury and she'll probably be boring for the rest of the game.

Kys fucking faggot sameposter, you ruin every Darksiders threads

waaah i can't fap so game bad waaaa

>Worth buying on a sale?
On a sale? Sure, go for it

No one can honestly argue this. It has half the content of even the first game, which was already pretty bare bones. Coming from Darksiders 2, 3 feels like a Kickstarter project.

Darksiders 2 had a $100 mil budget.
3 barely got made. Retard.

The first 2 yes, definitely. The third is pure garbage

Yes. 3 was weak, though. You can really tell it was fucked up along the way.

Was also WOEFULLY missing the classic Darksiders puzzle completion noise of duh-duh-duh-duh DUN.

Doesn't really justify it being a step backwards from almost everything in DS2 considering all the groundwork had been done for that game already. They could have reused assets and spent more time making the game worth $60.

Also the fact that they backpedaled and had to release an update just to make the game gel with the rest of the series says more than le small budget excuse ever could.

I like them. Haven't touched 3 since release but I've heard they patched it to be less Souls and more Darksiders.
Might play it soon again.

Attached: Darksiders III_20181129133100.jpg (3840x2160, 550K)

like zelda games? Then get 1&2
Want a ds clone? 3

Didn't play it with the DarkSouls combat but the game was pretty fun with the darksiders style of combat

one of my favorite cliffhangers ever

Attached: NOT ALONE.jpg (572x234, 47K)

2 sucks.
I hate spending most of the time climbing.
1 had a good balance between combat & plataform, I don't get why 2 couldn't be like that.