Female characters start with +3 int, -3 str

>female characters start with +3 int, -3 str

Attached: 1448980365973.jpg (2208x1242, 234K)

You mean level 1 all stats and maxed charisma.

cute

>those hands
what is she plotting, Yea Forums?

-3int and -3str sounds more accurate

making the boy an anonymous valentine

the advancement of the illegitimate state of israel

Black character starts whit +3 extra pokets

The vile propagation of cooties

cunny?

Redguards in TES start with -10 personality -10 intelligence

cute kids

Attached: ahfsdh.jpg (584x433, 30K)

Yea Forums rpg
>females start with -5 int, -5str

Yea Forums poster starts with -7 int, -4 str, -10 charisma, +4 endurance, -6 luck

>CHAOS, CHAOS!

I can already see her face as a blacked porn actress in the future.

R I P P I N

holding his hand to advance the spread of (((girl germs)))

what the fuck is wrong with americans?

they're obsessed with penises and vaginas and the colours of them

third world country populations tend to do that

>female characters start with an extra inventory slot

Attached: 1542201703313.jpg (720x720, 89K)

>female characters do more damage against virgins

Attached: 1558331958830.jpg (534x712, 73K)

Think of all the times a girl looked at you like that and you didn't notice

Attached: 1540039220053.jpg (796x1060, 202K)

Kids should be prohibited from carrying backpacks up until age of 10.

Attached: s3-73ce7bee57c8ba5c2d46715ed9db2cca.jpg (1600x900, 178K)

>+3 int
???
more like -2 Int, +6 cha, 50% chance to ignore male characters' Willpower save

unironically the best option. Never understood boosting int but charisma makes perfect sense.

Why?

there have been several studies and it is well documented and proven that it stunts natural growth, because kids tend to overload their backpacks, carrying too many books in them.

It fucks with their backs while they are still developing

That's crazy I used to load mine up with tons of shit i didn't need and I'm 6'2

lmao fucking chinlet.

I think Arckanum had men with more strength and women with more endurance. At least women could choose tomboy-background which gave them more strength.

Could've been 6'6, you fucked up

more like
-4 STR
-2 DEX, CON
-6 WIS
and a D20 roll where 1-10 is -10 CHA, 11-15 is +5, and 16-18 is +10

you could have been 6'3 or even 6'7 instead.
backpacks are responsible for 80% manlets in this world, yet no one ever talks about this problem.

>female characters start with +3 int, -3 str
Scientifically inaccurate, but it's necessary in order to not break the choice.

No one would pick female if they were accurate.
Only mentally ill trannies would.

3 CHR faget. And it's all in the tits.

lmao. Hilarious and I don't know why.

>You will never have your future cock sleeve look at you like this.

>+3 int
O I'm laffin
Accurate

-2 int that is capped at lower than male character int
-3 str again capped lower than male
+4 charisma

>choose female character
>romance options stay the same

Attached: 1516989509420.gif (256x145, 296K)