STOP GIVING CONSUMERS CHOICES IT’S DIVISIVE

>STOP GIVING CONSUMERS CHOICES IT’S DIVISIVE
How are these people so out of touch?

Attached: 868CDA34-E6F6-45F5-8201-103369C2F224.jpg (1242x1543, 768K)

>companies are going to give up on making money
Yeah, that's totally going to happen

Ubi doobie just wants to develop for one popular platform to maximise profits

>ex dev
why believe someone incompetent enough to lose a job at the most incompetent company in the industry?

it's called manipulative propaganda.

When a bunch of people say stuff that's shit and act like it's the best thing, they are trying to manipulate consumers into accepting it as the norm.

Why do you think normies buy into Games as a service?

>N4G

It’s just a news aggregator, all the “original” stories are just opinion articles.

I would love if every game in the world became multiplat. Then people would only buy consoles or PCs for specs and not because artificial gates.

>commies hate competition
shocking

The videogame industry is probably the most clueless/anti-consumer industry out there. How many millions have to be lost on bad ideas before they learn their lesson? America's ISP's are garbage and the infrastructure of existing 100+ old telephone lines cannot support the speeds needed for large scale gaming via streamed content. Just having a couple teens living in front of you is going to massively choke your bandwidth.

All that would do is drive one company to guaranteed victory. Imagine if it was accomplished last gen? Sony would have been bankrupt, then eventually Microsoft, as Nintendo would have been given a free pass in Japan.

First, not every customer buys only for quality. Others prefer pricing. Others mobility.
Second, if a company manages to release a console that is stronger, cheaper, mobile, with more features than all the rivals, I would be happy if it succeeded. If they drop the ball later then they will lose dominance.

Competition is the key for improvement.

Capitalism is shit though

He right though. The writing has been on the wall for years. Physical hardware and software just isn't needed anymore and in many respects its holding things back. I welcome the future when the silly console warring kiddies on here have nothing to argue about other than which streaming service they subscribed to.

yes goyim invest in stadia

>Nintendo ever going to stop making consoles

Nah bruh.

>streaming ever becoming practical
>the US ever upgrading its infrastructure to gig fiber in the next 20 years
>being able to ever break thinking tech will ever be able to solve the limits to the laws of physics

streaming will never be good or practical unless you want your games to be so shit as to be designed with latency built in so you don't notice it, at that point gaming will be a hellworld

Attached: 1520923031999m.jpg (1024x576, 38K)

capitalism and competition are not synonymous. there are coops competing with other coops and hierarchical corporations.

Their opinions belong in the toilet and you shouldn't support them.

>Streaming is good
>Companies get to decide which game you get to play
>Sorry user you can't play game 3 now that game 4 is out and was badly received, but we still need to get the micro money out of it
>Sorry user your favorite game was removed out of our library for you to play due to complaints that it was sexist/racist

mutualism is capitalism with extra steps since capital accumulation still exists, because the value form isn't abolished. Arguably a market could exist with luxury goods like gaming and entertainment exclusively under the right limitations but I'd need to research the details.

yeah, but everything else is even shittier

>The writing has been on the wall for years.
self validation through literal religious indoctrination, what a sad display.

>normies buy into games as a service

No they don’t. Normies rejected VR, why the duck would they support Stadia?