>witcher 3
>kingdom cum delivery
>both beautiful rpg games in medieval setting
>combat is fucking terrible
Was todd right all along with the combat in the elder scrolls, to keep it simple?
Witcher 3
No because Dragon's Dogma has good combat. Western Devs are just all garbage at making good combat for RPGs.
They have shit combat due the influence of elder scrolls
Prove me wrong
Dragon's Dogma sucks. Weeaboo all you like, you know it's true and you know you only like it because you can make little girls, you creepy cunt.
Cope
lmao sounds like the little baby normalfag couldn't handle actual fucking combat in a RPG.
Witcher 3 is early renaissance though
>not bitcher
>not kingdong cum
You got a long way to go before you're ready for shitposting, son.
Dragons Dogma is great
>neither is japanese
they COULD have good gameplay, were they not held back by the meager talents of the eternal westoid.
>DD
Overrated action mmo tier combat, how the fuck is this shit good?
at least W3's combat can be fixed with mods. Can't really say the same for any Elder scrolls game, ironically.
Because it's not overrated
Next question
Kingdom Come actually gets better 10 hours in with the combat. You won't be an unstoppable Knight right off the bat.
Absolutely based
Kingdom Come still has better combat than TES even with all the jankiness
Fippity bippity.
And yet DD looks ugly.
I suppose that's the trade-off.
It is on Yea Forums.
>DD Pros:
Combat is fun and engaging around all the classes.
Monsters and mobs look great.
Pawns are amazing. (Even when they're not.)
Dungeons are actually fun to explore.
>Cons
Night time too spooky for me.
No spears. Weapon selection is small in general.
No horses, feels like a necessity for a map this big.
Plot is stupid and dumb.
Nope
Yes it is.
No it isn't.
JUST FUCK ALREADY.
elder scrolls was the most fun if you played as a magician but they stripped all that down in skyrim to force you into stealth archery