what does the Yea Forums hivemind think about this?
What does the Yea Forums hivemind think about this?
Other urls found in this thread:
I like the setting but don't have any particular faith in CA releasing good TWs anymore.
the embargo is lifted. there are a lot of gameplays on youtube
-5 credit score
>Nu-CA
Nah, it will suck
I wasn't really interested until I saw more of romance mode.
you don't get these decisions in records mode?
Diaochan wasn't a real person so she only shows up in romance and they made a separate dilemma for records mode.
youtube.com
it looks good. I have some fears about the limited build slots
Can I create my own officer and lead my own nation?
no
>Yea Forums
>hivemind
the only thing this board agrees on is porn
that sucks that's part of why I didn't enjoy DW9
I'll reserve judgement when I see the AI. No point in buying if the AI is shit.
it's total war game. of course the AI is shit. anyway there are a lot of gameplays and reviews on youtube so you can see for yourself
>modern CA
No thanks bro
>Total War game after Medieval 2
No thank you.
have sex
"romance" of the three kingdoms has romance
IMAGINE MY SHOCK
No point in buying if combat is basically webm related against AI. The grand campaign is meaningless if you have to spam spear peasants against cheating AI that spawn full vets stacks in the fog of war.
HOW??
Now it's that but you also have 3 ai playing dynasty warriors in the middle of it
The chad on the top left and the cutie on the bottom right are my picks
>preorder Three kingdoms
>tell that to a girl
easy. she's legally required to have sex with you now
ARe they going to pull some bullshit and call it "historically authentic" again?
>no Medieval 3
fuck you and your asian market
can you play as the emperor?
Last good Total War was Shogun 2
Yes Cao Cao is in there.
day 1 torrent
Total Warhammer 2
How many dlcs till I can play as best girl?
Is shit
not enough negros, im going to have to report this to the crybaby discord.
they literally created the best warhammer game much less total war game you fuckin' dunce
Tentatively excited because of all the features they're finally putting back in, and are working to add in some more diplomacy related things, as well as stuff related to Empire building. I am glad they delayed the game by Three Months.
Tentatively worried because the game features Legendary Lord BS that is supposed to just be in Warhammer. It is also nu-CA which might horribly fuck it up. I also don't care about the setting, but it is something new for the series.
>game made to pander to chinks
>a week before release, china bans all games with killing and blood
This is what you get for fucking over Warhammer
>salty history fag
>nu-CA zoomer
That's actually the wrong romance
I wonder if they're even going to release a blood DLC for Three Kingdoms.
>Tentatively worried because the game features Legendary Lord BS that is supposed to just be in Warhammer.
If I remember right they said you can choose to use a more classical gameplay style for lords in the historical mode. Could be wrong on that though.
Warhammer 1/2 are not the best Total War games. They sacrificed everything except for the battles, and the battles were not really improved they just added in stuff like magic and unique unit types. I like Total Warhammer and was even a good goy and bought all the DLC, but I still think Rome 1/Medieval 2 are generally the best.
We feel like it would be profitable for it to be shit, for it will give Us a lot of shitposting material
They would be removing a lot of features if they did that though. I am pretty sure even in the non-romance mode there is still stuff like dueling, lords having ~3 lives, magical equipment and stuff like that. I just am not a fan of those two worlds mixing. I want Historical Total War games to be focused on being more (but not totally) realistic, while the Fantasy ones can have giant dragons and wizards.
How big are nu total war games? I don't think this is worth the GB
Mods always fix these sorts of issues in CA games.
>Warhammer players angry as fuck Three Kingdoms gets flagbearers and they don't
Kind of funny.
Dumb nigger
They should be hype. Changing models based off equipment selection, character dueling, and everything else is good news and should be in WH3. Stuff that is clearly needed. If it doesn’t show up then rage should ensue since it’s been done in 3K the fucks the excuse?
This. 3K makes me really hyped for WH3 and the improvements it will have.
It won't have anything like that.
Warhammer is fucking garbage and those games destroyed the franchise. They gutted, dumbed down, and ruined everything good about the series with that boring trash. If Three Kingdoms plays the same with the same boring and lifeless battles and '""streamlined""" campaign management, it too will be pure shit.
>destroyed the franchise
That's Medieval 2.
WH3 or 3K? Because 3K does have that stuff. If for some reason WH3 doesn’t, even though WH should of had that stuff from the start, I’d be pissed.
It's a recolored ToB.
It's way too weird to have a three kingdom game where general controls not 30000 but only 300 troops in battle
Different Teams™
TWW3
There is one womyn on it, one womyn, that's too much womyn TOO MUCH WOMYN, WE DON'T LIKE WOMYN, ONLY MOM, BUT SHE NOT WOMYN, HOCHYCHYN WO SHIN MAO DING FUK!!!!
>Yea Forums in an nutshell
Yours is the first post adressing that.
Medieval 2 wasn't very good, but no, plenty of the games that came after it were fantastic. Warhammer was not one of them and utterly killed it.
Do you know that "something completely fucking obvious said with a straight face while sounding snarky" right?
Is almost as if Yea Forums wasn't a single person.
What about the nu creative assembly comments? what do you think they are implying?
>plenty of the games that came after it were fantastic
Napoleon was okay, but other than that TWW is the only good thing that happened with the series after Rome.
as usual, none of them look chinese
everyone and their moms kept demanding it like the stupid sheeple they are, and now we have it, and it is rome2s chinese foster brother, but even more of a disgrace.
>cunt-eyed yellow monkeys
>not chinese
How so?
>Medieval 2 wasn't very good
only so good that most people consider it the pinnacle.
For the majority of them, that's was their first total war game.
>character dueling
>should be in WH3
If you only mean the actual characters distinct from the rank and file, yeah, not doing that would be disgraceful.
If you mean that every individual soldier should have fully synchronized combat animations, that wont be in WH3, as it would take more money than they have or could ever make from the game, since there are not only humans that you need to pair up and choreograph at least a dozen different fighting animations for, but also other humanoids of wildly differing shapes, and then also non-humans, without even going into special cases like giant monsters or swarms of bats or rats, etc.
She's in the base game but by her real name
That the nu-CA is made up of onions drinking cucks that produce trash like Rome 2, something I bought on release that was a broken, shallow, boring piece of shit and have then continued to gut the series with shit like warhammer
Even then it'd make sense for SOME characters like Tyrion or Wulfrik and less so for fucking Throgg or Mazda.
Duels are great but would only work on a limited selection of characters.
The other improvements on the other hand? Sieges, formations where applicable, retinues, all should be in.
No. Empire, Napoleon, Shogun 2, Rome 2, and Attila. Those were all great and the peak of the series. Warhammer is 0/10 cancerous shovelware that killed the franchise.
>Empire, Shogun 2, Rome 2, and Attila
>Those were all great
Oh you. Empire and Rome 2 are the two worst releases TW games ever had. You have a short memory.
>Napoleon, Shogun 2
Only good ones in your post.
>Shogun 2
>good
Wow
Bait
How new are you?