Is it the right time to argue about Nintendo’s copyright boner, Yea Forums?

Is it the right time to argue about Nintendo’s copyright boner, Yea Forums?

Attached: 9503A0B1-470A-4DF2-9E4E-034BE0282E6D.jpg (1407x503, 186K)

No. Who gives a shit? They'll copyright strike some dude for a while, figure out its pointless since some other dude will just reupload everything and stop, just like all the other times some company tries to stop any form of piracy. It's futile.

Even if they don't really care and it's pointless, they still need to throw around some cease and desist letters and file some lawsuits every once in a while to maintain their copyrights, legally.

You're a retard. The YouTuber you're posting "Brawlmaster" or some shit written in a cringe manner, literally uploads 30 minute long looping rips of Nintendo's songs directly from the game files. It doesn't matter what company you do this with, they will ALL copyright claim that video because it's the full song in its entirety, unedited. Eat a dick.

Except there isn't really anything to talk about as this kind of shit was already settled years ago during Limewire getting sued into bankruptcy.

How can people seriously defend retarded behavior from multi-billion dollar companies?

What goes through their mind when they makes posts like these?

Seething. Sorry your vid got taken down

I don't suck corporate dick therefore I'm whoever the fuck this screenshot is about. Fuck off.

Just buy the CDs, poormie.

>if you disagree with me you are sucking on penises
Excellent argument

Sorry, you're obviously taking it up the ass. Rude of me to mix those up

I think that society has collectively determined that music is not something you pay for, except in certain instances, just like porn and ebooks.

Seethe bro

Typical faggot response

That's not what he said. He said if you care more about a billion dollar corporation than you, yourself, getting to listen to the music you want, you're a pathetic, fat corporate cocksucker. And he's exactly right. Luckily that doesn't fit the description of anyone here, unless they're being ironic.

Seethe

Copyright was designed for an era without the concept of the modern internet. Rather than overhaul the defunct laws, people with money have seen fit to instead overhaul and destroy progress. People -- particularly in the land of the free -- defend them doing thus because they created the concept that they're allowed to do so. Not that this has stopped them from reinventing the purpose and form of copyright when it suited them however, considering how long it lasts after an artist dies.

I love how money is the most important aspect of your arguments. Its all about you. Its all about "gimme gimme gimme". Doesn't matter how many small developers get fucked over when you remove copyrights, as long as one big guy gets hurt and you get your cute little song.

Pathetic

>b-but think of the small businesses
Everytime

>gee who benefits the most from copyright law?
>small-budget developers who rely on word-of-mouth marketing and would have to kneecap themselves to press legal claims
>or large multi-million dollar entities that can handle marketing entirely by themselves and keep a kennel of attack lawyers on payroll
relly tunken bout this

WHY IS EVERYONE SUCH AN OBEDIENT LITTLE KEK NOW

Because its okay when Nintendo does it

This but unironically.

Don't companies just monetize the videos for themselves? If this guy believed he was entitled to that cash himself then he's an idiot.

All developers

Seething

Nintendo doesn't take down the music, they just monetize it.

The channels are being little bitches and removing anything they can't make money off of.

Dilate

If nintendo offered half these songs there might be some merit. You can say "but the game has the song just buy the game!" but I don't want to listen to it with sound effects strewn about, or have to capture it to listen to it at my leisure. I just want to listen to it on fucking youtube. If you don't offer it for purchase through a soundtrack, of course i'm going to youtube. Fuck them for removing songs while not providing a replacement.

Yes, they monetize it. When a lot of these uploads aren't monetized to begin with. Nintendo puts 6-7 ads on a 15 minutes looped song, making it intolerable to someone without an adblocker.

Gilvasunner and Brawl12345 whatever are fucking cucks.

Why the fuck would you not have an adblocker on.

>Wihout an adblocker
I don't get how people can use the Inernet without an adblocker.

>uses his favorite /pol/ word
Damn you are mad bro

:)

No seriously. You're okay with stealing music from nintendo but turning on an adblocker is a step too far? Fuck the fuck off.

>not giving your shekels to nintendo for their great music
what are you guys, poor?

Copyright is a spook

Those songs are available literally everywhere you seething incel. The people who get targeted are ones who do this shit for profit

It's the point i'm making that nintendo is monetizing this shit and a lot of these uploads aren't monetized because they're just sharing the fucking content that nintendo doesn't make easily accessible.

Seems like I struck a nerve lol

>no u
Lol

Actually you know what, If it puts a stop to Silvagunners unfunny FLEENTSTONES LOLXD vinesauce garbage I'm all for it.
Go Nintendo, Go out and fuck this moron to the extreme.

SiIva is the one high quality ripper who won't get hit, if anything.

>a medical word that all trannies use to maintain their wound is now a /pol/ word

Why would this effect remixes?

I don't care to discuss your obsession with trannys.