could geralt beat sekiro in a random encounter?
Could geralt beat sekiro in a random encounter?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>spams Quen, I-frames, speed debuff traps, traps, bombs, while also parrying and munching on a massive stockpile of food to heal whenever with his free hand.
It will be amusing to see his antics in the eyes of Sekiro
Geralt would make Sekiro dude kill himself without even needed to touch him.
Why would they attack each other in the first place
The witcher doesn't have i-frames, it's one of the many reasons that soulsfags hate it so much.
using geralt is cheating.
the guy cucked satan, next you gonna bring my boy dante and make another dumb thread
Lore wise witchers are trained to fight monsters not humans.
Geralt maybe a legends as a witcher but even he can lose easily to a good swordsman.
>not spending 5 fucking skill points to have pseudo I-frames on a game that you can casually curbstomp on death march in the first place.
and they have the gall to defend DS2
Are soulsfags retarded? Almost everything in TW3 is (sadly) super easy to just tap dodge to avoid and even then there's quen if you need a crutch.
dude sneaking around usually isnt a good sign and the smell of weird blood, ash and foreign medicants combined would probably make G a little fucking suspicious after Blood and Wine
You should consider actually reading the books before posting about witcher lore.
learning the parry timing for his pirouettes would be fun
In a cool duel that respected both series we'd see Sekiro overwhelm Geralt but not without needing a resurrect, and then they both concede and work together to kill demons and mythological creatures.
Witchers writers are a bunch of Mary Sue shitters who could never allow their perfect Mc to ever lose to anything. I'm guessing in geralts universe he'd have a few "cuts" and walk away like a cunt.
Sekiro was fighting some of the best foot soldiers and Shinobi and the series acknowledges that he couldn't have done it without dying many times because it's ridiculous for someone to be perfect and win all the time. Sekiro may not be the best fighter but he still won on the end.
the roll doens't have i- frames, the side step has tough
Nah, he'd think sekiro was similar to a witcher but something different as well. Sekiro kills monsters as well.
Rules:
Geralt can't use any of his signs
Sekiro can't use his prosthetic tools
only a sword fight
A shitty katana couldn't even cut through a Witcher armor.
If resurrection works Sekiro will win, fucking obviously.
Morgan would kill both SOI boys and not think twice about it.
>who could never allow their perfect Mc to ever lose to anything
except a pitchfork
You can't have anything against Geralt. The fans are such rabid assholes and are blind to how much of a Mary we Geralt is that they would pull the wildest mental gymnastics to justify why Geralt would win against Master Chief or a guy completely out of his league
t.Haven't read the books
Geralt would do some mumbo jumbo ritual to remove the respawn obviously.
>Geralt is a Mary Sue
How do i know you've never read a single witcher book or actually played the games?
Or Like books in general to know what the term ''Mary-Sue'' means.
>a sword saint shinobi vs a master witcher
I mean geralt would probably win, I don't like witcher, but in a pretend world where they have somewhat level power levels this unironically would be a fun fight
a way better question: would sekiro be able to sneak up on geralt?
>Mary Sue
I want to punch your stupid head in.
Pure sword fight Sekiro > Geralt (not least because Sekiro has insane techniques in combat arts)
With tools and magic Geralt > Sekiro, barring resurrecting until he wins.
>suspenders
>not a neo soi-cuckoid
KEK
>What is butcher of blaviken
>What is getting taken advantage of by triss
Or Unseen Elder
>faggot that dies from being breathed on vs. mary sue ubermensch
yeah i'm pretty sure geralt wins
>He thinks anyone gives a fuck about his entry level books
We're talking about video games.
And yes Geralt is a Mary Sue. No, having people seethe at G but just come off as jealousy isn't a negative, it's just stroking his ego. When everyone who starts shit with him get their ass handed to them that just proves there is a bias.
Can you name a single negative to being Geralt?
He'd probably drink with Geralt and regis
He literally gets broken so badly he's out of commission for a while. And it was a fucking mage that fucked geralt up. With a staff
>Pure sword fight Sekiro > Geralt
Nah. Geralt has much more experience and some crazy moves, the combat in the games is just too meh to show them properly.
Getting discriminated against
Here comes the witcherfags defending their perfect MC. Please tell me about some secret that wasn't in the games why we should take the guy with white hair seriously as a realistic character when he sleeps with everyone he wants and never loses a duel. Your story is broken, your character is is unbelievably predictable and boring.
>Sekiro can backstab him and instakill him
>but on the other case, gerlad can look and sekiro and turn him gay, and then kill him whit aids
Geralt would lose. In the Witcher books he got his ass beat by a fucking wizard with a cane (who didn't even use magic) and wasn't a swordmaster.
Geralt is at a bit of a disadvantage against enemies that aren't mindless monsters.
Even if he does win it's typically by the skin of his teeth.
Arguably he could beat Sekiro once but he'd be so beat up and hurt that as soon as Sekiro revives it's over. Witcher can sadly only do so much.
Also a master witcher is different from a swordmaster, most of what makes Geralt dangerous isn't his impressive swordsmanship it's the fact that his mutations make him superhumanly fast and that his sword is so sharp people say it's like a razor blade.
Against an opponent like Sekiro unless he's chugged potions Geralt would just get smashed
Witcher 1 literally starts with a dead Geralt.
By who? He can go to any shop and buy stuff. People still ask him for help, his discrimination makes no sense, it feels like a last minute tacked on flaw that barely effects him. Feels like "people distrust him" was added because he seemed too perfect to begin with
>Never loses a duel
Except to detlaff where regis helps him
sekiro literally gets his shit pushed in by dying peasants with rusty swords
i don't understand how you faggots can think he's powerful just because you cheated to beat this awful game
No one who played souls had problems with Witcher 3. And souls aren't hard it's just tells how pathetic TW3's difficulty is.
In witcher 3 times are desperate so it isn't as noticeable because people have other needs that Geralt can help them with. Even high society.
But in the previous games it was there. Retard. Guards mocking him, and people telling him to fuck off because he was a witcher subhuman.
>strikes your sword
>literally nothing happens
wow what a shit game
Geralt canonically died to a shirtless peasant with a pitch fork
>those combat cutscene during the fight versus the wild hunt at kaer morhen
I fucking love the witcher style of combat, litteraly spinning around dodging and covering all angles with their swords.
"Mhmm....giant slash marks all over the victim....a Sekiro™, gotta be"
lmao he'd walk within 2,000 miles of a fire and instantly die
god you people have such SHIT taste in games
>chug 500 potions
>bear school armor
>that steel swrod from toussaint
>do witcher vodoo detective investigation of how sekiro immortality works
>make trap
>wait for chink to try to sneak on guy with superhuman vision, hearing, smell and reflexes
>stun sign
>power attack
>chink dead
>proceeds to have sex with hunchback tsundere milf wife on top of a stuffed unicorn after getting wasted with his bros.
wow so hard
Exactly that's the point. He dies, and eventually he wins. That's a good character in my opinion.
Some smug quasi anime fanfiction character who has a 99:1 win ratio seems too ridiculous to have in these debates because this character can't seem to lose in these fights.
Yet he still fucks half the village's women at the age of consent, while all those he helped worship him.
Sekiro is faster and more agile, master shitton of combat arts, meanwhile geralt is slow old fuck who gets raped by village guards even while using signs, he has no chance against sekiro
Do you expect women to have values? Forbidden fruit etc retard
>Geralt looks to cure sekiro of his immortality and accidentally helps him beat his own game.
Actually sounds kind of funny.
In the books it's noted most women find him creepy and unsettling but fuck him anyway because it's "dangerous" the games accurately depict this because women are whores
For one a Mary Sue is a character that is good at everything without training or earning it. Witchers went through a hell of experiments and training as children that only few survive so obviously the ones that make it out alive are very good fighters. Geralt still has canon flaws in his techniques, makes dumb choices and is in love with a woman that treats him like dirt. He got killed once by a peasant and was brought back via things out of his control. He's canonically ugly even if players find him handsome, seeing someone like that irl would simply be offputting.
>Sleep with everyone
Couldn't bang Henrietta in my game, was it bugged??
Also he gets bitchslapped to near death by the Unseen Elder. A higher vampire like Detlaff is the maximum he can take on but also not really consistently.
>but muh books
Geralt is totally written into a mary sue in the games this is not debatable. He even gets more perfect and handsome with each installment
Witcher game in ancient japan
I'd play it
Soulsfags can't deal with the idea of having to actually dodge instead of magicking through a hit
Sekiro is one of the weakest MCs ever. Guy has to parry 50 times for deathblow, does pathetic damage, and dies in 2-3 hits from everything. My answer is yes
No, you're retarded for taking what he said at face value.
Geralt fucking sucks against magic users, assuming Sekiro used the spear and the mystical sword saint attacks Geralt would get his asshole raped
my point is that sekiro is a bad game and will be forgotten within a year
no
but that's pretty much geralt in a nutshell.
>go get drunk in a shitty tavern
>gets pushed into shit he didn't want to be in
>ends up having to remove the ancient curse afflicting the region.
>t. defensive soulsfag
Geralt's signs are stronger than anything Sekicuck has.
I fucking love how you try to pretend Vilgefortz is just some wizard and not the most powerful human that ever wielded magic and sword.
So which is it? Is he disgusting? Is he attractive? You can't just say "they think he's disgusting and that's why theh want to fuck him". What the fuck kind of writing is that. The games give me whiplash, half the people act like rabid psychotics and the other half worship him and everything he's done.
you're the first who has given a really good flaw. Being hopelessly in love with women who are awful to him seems like a good character flaw. I don't hate Geralt, I hate what he makes people think. That he's some perfect dueler who can fight off anyone. It's the batman scenario, where the fans will come up with some convoluted reason for coming out in the end despite fighting retarded monsters who throw mountains and he's just a rich guy in some kevlar and billions of dollars.
I can understand a real reason for comparing fighters but one of them had to have a reason for having an edge up against their opponent.
Could either of them beat weeb geralt?
>fighting random guard
>uses all potions,signs,best armor and swords
>still gets assfucked by 2 guards
sorry mate but geralt is weak even with magic
But that one has cute celtic mermaid harpy of immortality waifu who's into /ss/.
>He's canonically ugly
That's not true. He's sinewy, thin, and heavily scarred but a female character comments that his body is ultimately attractive. His face isn't ugly, it's his general appearance that unnerves people, and that is largely due to his seeming lack of emotion, and his voice being unpleasant.
But I love the souls games and the Witcher trilogy
>Is he disgusting? Is he attractive?
In Witcher 2 a woman calls him "ugly something fierce" but also says that ugly men are more interesting. Women don't really pick by looks alone, Geralt has alpha energy and a trained body and probably a mutated dick. That's more than you need
Phoenix feather and divine abduction alone could end him instantly.
>trained to fight super fast vampires, werewolves, huge flying creatures
>loses to a human?
not likely my dude
The side step has i-frames unless you use it right after a strike
Boy howdy now I done spot a feller ain't never read the books
Sekiro is on another level.
Geralt is really fucking strong but Sekiro is a fucking shinobi with the ability to resurrect and with super human combat abilities.
They both kill monsters, Sekiro does it 10x as fast.
The thing with Sekiro is that he isn't very tough at any point, he's small and can't take a beating. So almost anyone can beat him if they get lucky but also lose pretty much instantly if they fuck up.
>implying sekiro fights humans only
He isn't actually ugly but he's not attractive either. People find him creepy because he's literally a pale mutant with cat eyes but women fuck him once again for that danger aspect
>bad writing
Women fucking love bad boys you idiot. It's the same thing
Sekiro is a dumb cheater with god mode just like ass soulsbabby protags.
this post makes no sense considering how horrendously easy witcher combat is even "without iframes". i started up TW3 on death march and was facerolling the game by the time i got my 1st set of witcher gear barely 10 hours in. those games are for literal brainlets.
Always broke
Can't have kids
Having shit taste in women
Humans treating you likw shit despite you being what stands between them and the monsters
>Crazy moves
Like?
>hmm smell of cum and shit mixed with some kind of lubricant
>must've came from OP's asshole
>who can fight off anyone
Because he's a magical man mutant with superhuman reflexes. Unless you have some powerful magic or a fucking gun he actually CAN fight off anyone. Sekiro would get absolutely destroyed unless he came back 500 times just to wear Geralt down but at that point dragon rot would kill all his friends.
If you wanted someone that could actually beat Geralt you should've picked someone from metal gear rising or something. Or like any character from an actual fantasy game
Semi circles
youtube.com
Look at him gooo
Not once was that ever implied faggot.
OH NO NO NO NO
>cutscene power
user...
I unironically miss this weird looking fighting style, and stlye switching. TW1's combat had a lot of potential for improvements, instead they chose to make it a lesser Dark Souls
Nah, sekiro moves 10x faster than your fatass weeb fantasy character. Geralt doesn't know the difference between a parry and a block and would get his asshole repurposed as sekiros sheath.
Compare the speed of the witcher to sekiro and go cry in your pillow
Yes and? I already said the combat in the games looks too janky to show anything. In TW3 when you level sword fighting and just hold down square he does this spinning thing for a 5 mintues until everything on screen is dead.
One. Mind.
Women are whores in general and whores especially for monstrous and violent men. Look at the success of garbage erotic fiction aimed at women. Vampires, werewolfes and sadistic billionaire psychos.
Real life serial killers get bags full of love letters. I mean it helps when a man is handsome, but him being dangerous and alpha is the most important thing.
Why does he even need to learn it again?
pretty sure geralt would still win. his cannon reflexes are ridiculous. in the books there's a part (I forget exactly how it goes, but someone is doesn't believe the rumors around geralt and so geralt turns his back to him with a crossbow and he still manages to parry the bolt by just listening for the sound of it releasing.
Is the writer an inclel like yourself? Is that why you like Geralt, because he sleeps with women that find him disgusting and despite being an outcast still beats everyone up?
>Geralt is not a Mary SUE STOP SAYING HES A MARY SUE
I think it would honestly depend on Geralts "build" if we're going by the Videogame. A Sign focused Geralt could really fuck up Sekiro's day because he doesn't really deal with a lot of mages and Geralt would be spamming that shit, but a combat focused Geralt is an unstoppable monster once he gets high on Adrenaline and probably wouldn't afford Sekiro any rest in a fight. He'd be like a much tougher Centipede Giraffe or O'rin of the Water.
A mixed skills Geralt wouldn't really provide the strength in any one department he would need to overpower Sekiro's posture. In that case I'd probably imagine Geralt would be like a less threatening Owl.
Why are people so fanatic?
>muh witcherfags
>muh soulsfags
You faggots are insufferable, both games are great.
Just shut the fuck up already.
Do you ever wonder why nobody takes this seriously? Because you could literally write whatever the fuck you want and ignore the unspoken power levels and just say Geralt could gaze at a mirror 2km away and predict the location of a bumble bee and you'd think that's amazing writing
I mean when your criteria becomes "either Sekiro beats him or he's a Mary Sue" what are we even trying to discuss here?
Everything I said was true. I don't have a horse in this race, I'm not a witcher fanboy. But women sleeping with a rugged, violent man who's anything but the ideal son in law is absolutely realistic.
>sekiro
>faster than Geralt
The state of weebs
NO!
my superhero could beat up YOUR superhero!
>age of consent
He first fucked Shani when she was like 14 or something and he was 40
Because we're arguing about if Geralt is even flawed or really is the flawless machine his fans treat him as. Either he's amazing at everything but people find him disgusting and he's discriminated against or he's still perfect and flawless.
I'm not arguing that. I'm saying Geralt is too perfect and apparently could kill anyone because he has "plot device" special powers.
>Don't talk about two games
Kill yourself
blue-, cringe-and whiteknightpilled
Nigga sekiro can parry bullets
What are you even babbling about, retard?
Thinking of skipping DoH, will I still be a true Shinobi?
>he couldn't have done it without dying many times because it's ridiculous for someone to be perfect and win all the time
remember Isshin?
Look at this stupid asshole.
he is.
Sekiro can deflect bullets
Witcher 3 does have i-frames, they just have certain conditions for them to occur.
Why is everybody in the game so rude to Geralt all the time? I get that people are intolerant of weird mutants but it seems rather suicidal to start a bar fight with a superhuman killing machine that just easily disposed of the werewolf that had been terrorizing your village. Yet they are so smug about it like they think they can actually beats Geralts ass.
with how unbalanced axii is, i dont think sekrio even stand a chance.
Peasants are dumb, that's why they're peasants.
*drinks blizzard potion*
Nope. Geralt gets destroyed hard.
Geralt is only Building and Transonic.
Meanwhile Sekiro is Small City and Massively Hypersonic +
Geralt has a literal star trek enterprise forcefield on demand and can control minds like a drunk autistic horny jedi.
Geralt is a terrible power level comparison because to beat him you need to get into the next category of autism like dante, azura, etc who would easily win
>Super mutant specifically designed to fuck up monsters numerous times better than humans in every way possible
>Fuckin hella good shinobi
Man who will win I wonder
it would just stun him like every enemy in witcher 3
Not if dutch throws them mangos first
He was killed by a peasant with pitchforks.
If you don't know the series why even discuss it, you fucking nigger?
be honest. the bullets are slow as hell and even some regular ol human mooks have sword attacks that are faster than the bullets.
You faggots still not realizing that Geralt isn't all that strong. He was murdered by fucking peasant with fucking pitchfork back in the day. I think that they both are on the same level, they should grab beer and drink together rather than fight.
he says it's not practical at all in combat. geralt gets fucked up in the books quite a bit too, and it doesn't take much to do him in considering his abilities. there's one sorcerer who kicks him into the dirt without even breaking a sweat.
Also i think that in arm wrestling geralt would win.
>Geralt was badly injured
Didn't want to murder a literal 14 year old kid
>get a pitchfork shoved on his back while trying to stop humans and non humans to murder each other
>Either he's amazing at everything but people find him disgusting and he's discriminated against or he's still perfect and flawless.
Nice strawman.
>he has "plot device" special powers.
In that case you should be able to give some examples of fights Geralt should have lost. There are actually several points throughout the games where you can be instakilled pretty easily. Geralt can only survive if he sticks to his hobo lifestyle doesn't piss off anyone important.
Hesitation is Defeat
nah they are both monster hunters,they would get drunk together,after which Geralt would like an alpha he is drag Sekiro away to bedroom and have hot anal sex with him,after this they would stay friends who fuck from time to time ,more dominant one being Geralt who would ravage Sekiros ass
>but even he can lose easily to a good swordsman.
My dude, you have clearly not read the books. He utterly obliterates entire groups of highly trained swordsmen purely through fencing ability. That's why he's called the Butcher of Blaviken.
The only fight against a human that he ever loses aside from the pitchfork thing at the end is against a sorcerer who had accelerated his personal timeline by a factor of about 4, so Geralt moved in slow motion to him and he hit with quadruple the force and speed.
I've never understood that either, I understand that some part of an uneducated dumb population could be rude, but Witchers are literally there just to protect humans, why would you be against someone that only serves to protect your world
There's very few witchers left in the world, for whatever reason most were wiped by each kingdom's population and ruler or whatever reason.
it's like the Templars getting rekt by the french king irl.
group of warrior monks got too strong and influential for their own good and made rulers butthurt because people relied on them more than the kings protection.
Because Witchers are scary, and that's enough for the lay man to not like them. The Cat and Snake schools have both done some sketchy shit that resulted in peoples lives being miserable, Witchers are a "trade" and they charge descent sums for certain creatures, and people are assholes who want to negotiate prices after the fact and get upset when the Witcher doesn't want to.
>witchercucks thinking they are relevant at all
l o l
It was more in the books monsters were really rare compared to the early days. So much that peasants were creating imaginary monsters for something to blame.
Idunno why, geralt cannot beat anyone from dmc series they tank swords through the chest like nothing, regrow entire limbs and nero crushed saviors head with a giant ass hand and and flings bosses weighing tons like nothing and moves so fast he can dance around a van killing every demon around it and land right back in the van before it landing back on the ground, thats some flash tier speed. Either one of the spardas would wreck geralts life.
Depends if he has oil for asians
>witcherfags unironically think geralt could last 10 secs with sekiro
>for whatever reason most were wiped by each kingdom's population and ruler or whatever reason.
That's not the main reason, though certain Witchers have been victims due to getting wrapped up in politics, the main reason is that fighting Monsters is dangerous as fuck, and it's a high lethality job. There aren't many Witchers anymore because no schools are making new Witchers and haven't for a hundred years, and in the Witcher 3 we're at the point where no one really remembers how to perform the Trial of Grasses.
True, Geralt could kill Sekiro in barely 5 seconds
The schools and their residents were all murdered.
Kaer Morhem is in ruins and vesemir was the last of the actual teachers in there. Without the druids which all got pitchforked they can't do the trial.
Sekiro is just an immortal human. He has no real magic. Heck, he isn't even a true immortal. He's more of a zombie than anything. As long as you cut off his limbs, he ain't doing shit anymore.
Can you name the times he has lost?
No, they scattered and were picked off when Witchers picked up a more solitary life style as their numbers were reduced and Witchers made less frequent visits to their "Home" castles. Castles require extensive upkeep and repair that Witchers could not afford or effectively perform on their own for obvious reasons. I don't recall the trial requiring druids, though it does have a magical component, it can be performed by any mage, as I think Yen does it for Uma
Genichiro cut off his limb and look what happened.
No way to tell, since it's random
cucked satan as in ressurected? Sekiro does that all the time lol