>ONE! The parent is absolute. Their will must be obeyed. ...Yet I'm sensing some insubordination.
>TWO! The master is absolute. You give your life to keep him safe. You bring him back at any cost. ...At this rate, you'll lose him again.
>THREE! Fear is absolute. There is no shame in losing one battle. But you must take revenge by any means necessary! ...I wonder if you've got it in you - to bring me down.
KINO
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
I love this game
Easily the best Fromsoftware game of this decade. I dont know why it gets so much hate around here especially by the bloodlets
Is there a better dad than Owl in vidya?
FLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR
youtube.com
Truly kino
how do you get him to saw the other two, if you ressurect a second time he doesnt say shit
It was good but after one playthrough I'm done. I've beaten the butterfly lady again on NG+ and now I just feel like there's nothing much extra to do.
I rank it second place after BB.
This is a very common opinion but it triggers sekiro fans to no end because they either haven't played BB, or otherwise think it should take #1 spot.
THIS
Is the true reason why there's conflict within the fanbase.
Sekiro is great but it's mostly great for it's core mechanics, the game as a whole just isn't on the same quality and level of ambition BB is.
Being the number 2 is still an excellent result but a lot of Sekiro fans just can't accept that.
>muh builds!
>muh pvp!
It exposed the soulsfags
That's nice
What? Yes he does
Well for one you're underestimating how extreme the soulsborne players are, they're going into Sekiro with extreme bias because fanboyism; they're so insufferable that they cant even find a valid reason to hate on the game.
Literally everytime you ask why Sekiro is worse than Dark Souls or Bloodborne they go through intense mental gymnastics to justify their stance, they'll even go as far as to lie or some some shit like "oh its not good because stealth is half baked".
I like BB more but it's better than Dark Souls for sure. Dark Souls babies just aren't good enough.
God I love the phase 2 portion of his theme.
you are not the only one, that part was easily the entire best part of the soundtrack, it really fits the atmosphere and should have been part of the Great Owl version
Really wish the game focused on samurai kino aspects instead of the dumb immortality fetch quests
>getting past the bandits in Hirata state
>that one burning area
>teaming up with that guy to take on like 10 enemies and the drunkard
>the lady butterfly fight in the burning basement
>the whole outskirts section up to the castle
>climbing roofs and dealing with ninjas while infiltrating
>facing the elite samurais of the castle that are miniboss tier when you are new to the game and don't know better
>the whole Genichiro fight ending with lighting reveral duels
>the whole mentor-surpassing fights(that could have been better if Owl was a more active character)
>the vs Isshin on the burning roof fight
>the perfect final boss fight aganist Sword Saint Isshin
So much better than the rest of the game
Everything you said is subjective opinion, sounds like you are triggered by people saying that Sekiro is better.
Bloodborne is great but the game as a whole just isn't on the same quality and level of ambition Sekiro is. Being the number 2 is still an excellent result but a lot of Bloodborne fans just can't accept that.
I beat this fag last night. Took me a while to realize you just have to sprint around him and poke him when he's done his big strikes.
I activated tree man at fountain head palace but didn't kill true monk yet is it too late to go back and trigger the events to fight Owl 2?
>It was good but after one playthrough I'm done. I've beaten the butterfly lady again on NG+ and now I just feel like there's nothing much extra to do.
You always see this kind of posts and just have to wonder... is it bait? Surely no one is this retarded, right?
Like you're just gonna skip multiple boss fights you have never seen and fought before, and you have the nerve to claim there's nothing to do, see or experience anymore? Makes no sense.
I really enjoyed replaying NG+++++++++++ in this one, even more than in souls games, because you can truly appreciate how good the combat is once you learn how to play the game.
Also, you can do no charm + demon's bell.
Why do people complain so hard about the lack of weapon variety when the prosthetic fulfills that ten fold?
I think you're still OK. Defeating Tree man is what triggers the change of world state.
Do I have to beat genichiro or can I go fight the ape or monk first?
Because it's hack and slash garbage just like BB and DS3. Go play DMC instead.
Everything you said is subjective opinion, sounds like you are triggered by people saying that Bloodborne is better.
Sekiro is great but the game as a whole just isn't on the same quality and level of ambition Bloodborne is. Being the number 2 is still an excellent result but a lot of Sekiro fans just can't accept that.
You can fight them first, and there are a couple benefits to doing so as well.
not him but,
>Bloodborne is better.
>no you
Why is Sekiro worse than Bloodborne? you're just saying the quality of the game is worse but how?
>benefits
like what
You need the gun fort key to fight the ape, and you can't do that till you beat genichiro
It doesn't. Reception was extremely positive.
I'm just mocking the hypocrisy of his statement. I like both games. Probably like BB marginally more for the setting, lore and world building. It had a sense of mystery that compelled me to move forward whereas Sekiro I didn't really care about the world, just wanted more cool sword fights.
I don't even know what this means.
Those 3 way fights when Ashina gets invaded >>>>> Any pvp in souls game
Here I said it.
Can you believe some people played this game with a dub that wasn't japanese or french?