What if I told you Arkham Knight was the best of them all?

What if I told you Arkham Knight was the best of them all?

Attached: cb4780fbf1067e374f2e7c3cc94be1600aacb944_hq.jpg (514x286, 33K)

I would agree. Replay them: Knight is the best despite its flaws (mostly to do with weak side content and annoying tank sections that basically don't matter if you play with Keyboard and Mouse nowadays); Asylum is the next best, with the tightest controlled gameplay and simplest to grasp story; City is next and is really not the 10/10 everyone said it is. It's just OK; Origins is meh.

>press triangle to awesome

whoa, really makes you feel like Batman

I played through AK with a controller and never even gave it a second thought. Only after beating it (and getting 3 stars on every AR challenge) did I hear about people complaining about controls and what not.

Also I thought the batmobile sections were fine.

I concur. With City being right behind it.

Asylum > Knight > City > Origins

I personally played it on PS4 first, and I thought they were the weakest part of the game, but I never had much trouble with them (until I died a few times during that last tank battle). But on keyboard and mouse, it's like the easiest third person shooter ever. Especially knowing about the weakspot from the beginning of the game.

I agree OP hating on knight is literally a meme because the port was so bad when it first released.

I liked Asylum and all, but considering City and Knight just has more of everything, how could it be better? It was a little hard going back to their barebones combat after playing City and Knight.

Origins was better than City.

More of open world trash doesn't make anything better

Asylum was pure Metroidvania, whereas the other two got lost in the open world meme.

It was open world, but that's not inherently bad. It's not like City and Knight were Ubisoft games, the overall scope was pretty small and dense. I thought the gliding and general mobility of AK were pretty fun, even.

>that's not inherently bad
Wrong

Based and redpilled

I kind of agree actually. I know most people are extremely divided on the Batmobile (which is understandable) but outside of that, gameplay-wise, everything else was a big refinement and step up in general in terms of what you can do during both the combat and predator sections. If people prefer Asylum or City over it, that's fine though, since I get that the Batmobile being what it is, can be that divisive enough for them and those games having their own elements that make them stand out.

Correct.

But it's not, and certainly not the case for any of the Batman games.

an arkham-style batman beyond game with the nemesis system from those lord of the rings games would be kino

>the nemesis system from those lord of the rings games
there were exactly two of those

yeah, those are the ones

It is, though.
Asylum was too linear and they had no idea what the fuck they were doing at all
Too much "lolz ur batman, just follow da trail" sections

City was just a mess - okay so you liked the fact we had a lot of bad guys in the first game? KEKE LETS JUST INVITE EVERYONE!

Origins was amazing, easily the second best and could be better if not for the fucked up upgrade system.

Knight, even though the new character was obviously not new, was quite good. And the Babs storyline was done well.