Why didn't it do as well as the first one? I recently beat both back-to-back and I can't go back to the first one with how good 2 is.
Why didn't it do as well as the first one...
Other urls found in this thread:
It did
Max Payne 2
Aggregate score
Aggregator
Score
Metacritic
(PC) 86/100[21]
(Xbox) 84/100[22]
(PS2) 73/100[23]
Max Payne
Aggregate score
Aggregator
Score
Metacritic
(PC) 89/100[33]
(PS2) 80/100[34]
(XBOX) 89/100[35]
(GBA) 78/100[36]
(iOS) 75/100[37]
MP2 is so much better than MP1 it isn't funny. I dunno how people can claim to like MP1 more just because of the story. MP2's gameplay is better than 3's even.
Imagine thinking Metacritic scores are unironically equitable to success
Max Payne 2 was a commercial bomb iirc. It didn’t help that it was PC exclusive unlike its predecessor, which came out on everything
Actor was perhaps the most generic guy they could possibly find for a noir cop story.
Sam Lake was amazing.
Also, like 80% of the game you're just killing hundreds of building cleaning crew guys, it gets really old.
MP2 was on Xbox and PS2 as well. But yeah, it is a real shame it bombed. Why did it, it was an objective improvement.
Captain
Baseball-Bat
Boy
Section
Holy shit.
First one was better. Better story, better graphic novel, better max Payne model. Second one was too short
That section was shit
That whole part was amazing. I fucking love MP2.
MP2 had the better story though. MP1 was kinda retarded in spots, with over the top conspiracies.