bruh...
look at this dood
bruh...
look at this dood
>s-save me antagonistic marketing!
Only Far Cry is allowed to be a successful open world shooter. Get FUCKED, no one asked for a Rage sequel. LOL!
Where are the shills now?
>Bethesda
does literally anyone actually expect Bethesda to be associated with a good game post-Oblivion?
Fallout 3 was the closest they came to making a good game, but that was ruined by how horribly executed everything was.
It isn't made by Bethesda though.
No fallout 3 was absolute garbage
Like he said: >was the closest they came to making a good game
If you buy games new that aren't multiplayer only you are a cuck. I will buy this on sale for 20 bucks and enjoy it.
Keys are under $40 already and it's not even out yet. They ran an awful marketing campaign for this game which is unfortunate because it looks like an open world DOOM.
Fallout 3 was far worse compared to both Oblivion and Skyrim.
I havn't played them; but, Dishonoured, nuDoom, and to a lesser extent nuPrey were supposedly good.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BEAT BORDERLANDS 3!!!1
why did they even make a sequel? nobody asked for one
I'm still gonna give it a chance. I'll watch a bit of a stream and then judge for myself.
Best part of all this Let's Play and Twitch culture shit is that reviews are dead. You can see the game and judge for yourself.
I didn't like the original Rage so I was skeptical of this to begin with.
can you two retards read past the first half of a sentence?
But, independent of you saying you dislike the execution, I was disagreeing with the first clause. I think Oblivion and Skyrim were both closer to making a good game. I never implied that you thought Fallout 3 was well executed.
I don't get it it either, it's like making a sequel to Brink
Wished they had revived Heretic or Hexen ip's over this. No one liked Rage, it was one of their most forgettable games by id.
You do know that the scores go from 0 to 100 right? 70 is good.
>um well the game would've been a 10/10 but you said something sassy on Twitter so I'm gonna have to downgrade you to a 7/10 k sweetie thanks next time don't trigger people
Literally the story of this game.
Except
User score
While I agree in principle that applying bell curve to game scores is dumb, it remains the burgers insist on treating 70 as passing,/mediocre
Which makes sense as most do a safe 3/5 score
>a 70 on a test where a 50 is considered failing is good
I am surprised the scores are that low. I expected this to be a 85% kind of game.
No, the issue is that it has microtransactions and retarded AI.
>70 is good
you seem to be confused, we're talking about video game reviews here, not movie reviews. 70 is trash.
>RAGE devs openly shittalk game journos on twitter
>surprised when they give the game a mediocre review
I think its their way of "marketing" which is nice, but the game itself is trash so that's a no sale for me.