Fallout 76: 53/100

>Fallout 76: 53/100
>Elder Scrolls Blades: 55/100
>Rage 2: 73/100
How will Todd attempt to turn Bethesda around?

Attached: CzpK5TzXgAAwKtw.0.jpg (1200x675, 77K)

To be fair rage 2 only has 3 reviews so far

I mean it's nice that everyone that bought it left a review.

Well it’s not actually out yet...

Just release Elder Scrolls VI.
Doesn't even have to be good, casuals will lap that shit right up.

>BETHESDA BAD

Attached: 5B9FA632-7EE0-4A96-BD9E-FD77AA5C8DB8.jpg (717x526, 70K)

Based Todd is in here with us.

I’m not saying that it’s good or bad, I’m just saying that you’re retarded if you hate a game before it’s even out just because you don’t like the dev, especially considering Bethesda’s not even the developer, just the publisher. If you have an automatic hate boner for Bethesda you’re just as bad as the people who shill their games

It won’t. All major game studios will fail within a decade. They have adopted a predatory/cash-out business strategy. They aren’t concerned about long term viability, only short term profit

He'll release a pre-rendered story cinematic trailer for ES6 and a trailer for Starfield filled with more lies that will get people excited again

Post your face when Elder Scrolls 6 uses the same Creation engine as Skyrim and Fallout 4

Post your face when op has an aneurism anytime Bethesda makes a new game and then starts a thread about it

Release skyrim 2 and make billions on name alone

Bethesda's only niche was decent open world games, and everyone makes those now. They can only make dumbed down normalfag bait now with all of the bugs and lazy work included.

Maybe they'll try releasing a finished game next

>Using Metacritic as a reliable source of criticism

>Fallout 76: 53/100
That's 52 more than it should have gotten.

He won't. Do you have any idea how many drones will buy starfield no matter what they do to it? Or whatever nu-fallout they make? He doesn't need to make better games. He's already making the money from those that keep kissing his ass.

Attached: 1557774117533.png (512x377, 292K)

>Oh my God! That train crash was terrible! I can't believe they never fixed the tracks. This whole disaster could have been avoided and all those effected could have left unharmed...
>You can't complain! You've never even ridden a train!

>everyone makes those now.

Nobody makes them like Bethesda. Bethesda emphasizes the sandbox, everyone else emphasizes the story and characters, i.e. cancer to gaming.

There's a reason everyone mods the fuck out of Bethesda's games but the mod scene for stuff like The Witcher 3 is dead. Only one is designed to allow modders to shape and mold to their own preferences. The other just has waifufags arguing over who is "best girl".

>Bethesda's only niche was decent open world games, and everyone makes those now.
Correction: Their niche is decent open-world games that are very open to modding, and no one else makes those. Looking at their recent history, though, it doesn't seem like even Bethesda will be doing that much longer. They're probably going to lock all mods down to their own platform for TES 6 and make you pay to get the toolset.

how did it earn that 1 point? attendance?

>There's a reason everyone mods the fuck out of Bethesda's games but the mod scene for stuff like The Witcher 3 is dead. Only one is designed to allow modders to shape and mold to their own preferences. The other just has waifufags arguing over who is "best girl".
Witcher 3's tools also don't let you add new quests or create your own character.

I disagree about story and characters being a "cancer to gaming", though. One of the biggest problems with Bethesda's games is that their stories and characters are bad.

What a fucking retarded analogy

>They're probably going to lock all mods down to their own platform for TES 6 and make you pay to get the toolset.

Not likely. Multiple times now Bethesda has admitted the mod scene is key to their success. I don't think they are going to put many barriers in their way. They might make it an option for modders to sell mods but they aren't going to make it difficult to make mods or require you to sell them or anything like that. Basically, they will be no worse than Valve.

Basically. 0 would be reserved for games that don't even launch.

>One of the biggest problems with Bethesda's games is that their stories and characters are bad.

They aren't bad. They are just very mediocre. What Bethesda is lacking compared to other games is not quality writing because nobody has that, it's just all the extended cutscenes everyone else puts in their games.

>Basically, they will be no worse than Valve.
Considering how bad Valve is, that's not exactly comforting.

It's nice that everyone that got a review copy released the review so quickly.

The only true statement in that opinion is that there are no extended cutscenes like others put in their games. Everything else is a wrong.

>3 reviews
It has 28 dipshit

Rage isn't Bethesda you fool