Paid mods

>tfw shit tier modders monetize their shitty products yet god tier ones like the guys that made SKSE do it for free
why does this ALWAYS happens?

I prefer donations, once you start up a mod marketplace the publisher/developer HAS to get involved and then shit just gets bananas after that.

What a glorious state the industry is in where we have to pirate mods now.

This. The moment the hobby becomes a job it loses what made it great in the first place.
Companies should prevent modders from getting money on their games while encouraging mods altogether with tools and shit. They already have insane script and mapping tools for the devs, they could just disponibilize that and let people have fun.

they should have the agency to do so, but it shouldn't be the standard
seems like a great way to get nobody to play their mod

>A mechanic can't charge money to modify a car because then he would be profiting off the car manufacturer's work
Fuck off retard.

150 what? Whatever shit coin is used in Costa Rica?

this
ill pay 20x as much for HD Feet though

Report it to capcom

They will shut this shit down so fast. Just like those faggots that tried to sell SFV mods.

>mods
>paid
>ever

kek
they do it for free

Nobody even wants to pirate OP's one. It looks like shit, especially with the "HD neck".
Especially since meanwhile free ones like this are being released every few days

Attached: 1557777075270.jpg (1560x2158, 1.44M)

mods are illegal
you are literally not allowed to modify the game

>car analogies.
>didn't even get the point.
>what is copyrighted intellectual property
>vs what are modifications that add value onto physical mobile or imobile assets
>the we all have john deere, most infamously, and some other automotive shenanigans denying it all trying to push it under the same IP copyrights anyway -- the right to repair/modify stuff.
i'm not that user, but you're clearly the retard one here.

RAPE MOD WHEN ?!?!

Attached: ORGASMING INTENSEFIES.jpg (1500x2055, 1.32M)

This is the most american thing I've ever heard

>150
lol and people say officially released DLC at 10-15 is a rip off

there's a big difference between being paid to modify physical property that you can actually own and being paid to modify intellectual property that you can only buy a license to

sure, and Capcom should be able to take all the profit, "fair use" is not a right its a legal defense and ambiguity does not favor the infringer

Is this real? People actually pay ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS for a shitty mod? Are you fucking kidding me?

Yes. As an artist who runs patreon and makes porn for my fans I do think modders also deserve to be compensated for their work.

what's an eula?
the publisher quite literally define the rules for what permissible or not on an ad hoc basis --or mostly, on a whim really.

>modify intellectual property that you can only buy a license to
games as a service is fraud

You're wrong and
>I'm a Patreon artist
Is about the farthest thing from a place of authority imaginable. You, and modders, should get real jobs instead of leeching off shit you don't have any right to use. You should also get sued for infringement.

sure if there are morons willing to throw away money

but i despise modders who get all smug about doing something everyone could do if they put the time in

What's your patreon, then?

>paid mods
rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3204518

150 FUCKING BUCKS FOR THIS? I CAN DO THAT SHIT MYSELF!
ARE THERE THAT MANY DESPERATE HORNY FUCKS TTO BUY?

This guy must be making a killing

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 972K)

Hot.

never underestimate the amount of desperate horny fucks

As soon as you introduce monetization into mods, it focuses on the most inane cosmetic shit for a quick buck. Exactly like

>Autistic fucks getting upset they can't have a shitty mod for a shitty game showing off some shitty tits.

Content creators of any kind can freely charge whatever they want for their mods. No one's forcing you to buy it, nor does it add anything to the game.

Anyone who gets upset over this shit should unironically kill themselves, because they're useless to society.

>Content creators of any kind can freely charge whatever they want for their mods
Sure, except they have no legal right to do so. They should all be C & D'd or sued, and get real jobs to contribute to society with.

I'm not upset I can't get it. I really do not want it, it looks like shit. I don't like that he's making money from retards with it, it should be illegal / Capcom should sue

Modding is fun and looks good on resumes

Not that user but that doesn't mean modders deserve to get paid for the mods themselves.

> hd neck

what the fuck... it's more like they dropped the tits way too low instead. This is a retarded as fuck mod.

>recruiter checks your resume
>made 10 sexy Claire mods for RE2

You can already get that for free, since like 3 weeks after the game's release

Attached: 1557735461087.jpg (1080x1080, 517K)

Modders can do whatever they want . A wise man once said "if you dont like it dont buy it".

All the best lewd modmakers do it for free and gain nothing from it. They are true heroes

No, they can't. If devs gave a shit about them, they'd be in legal trouble. They fly under the radar through apathy

Sure, but there's no guarantee people will buy it. There will continue to be many other modders who make just as good if not better mods and give them away for free.

You want to sell your mods, you have to compete with FREE, so your shit had better be the literal top tier of mods if you want any dosh for it.

>those angles

vanilla skyrim tier

dont think so because they're profiting from another companies work

Sure, if paypigs want to waste their money I don't care.

Imagine if someone listed their NSFW mods on a resume. Peak retardation. Hilarity would ensue.

Making SFW mods that are useful or technically complex could possibly look good on a resume for a relevant position.

Yes. Should they? Fuck no.

Honestly, imo, they should work for free.

Simply because they're using someone else's game, the only reason mods aren't cracked down on hard is because its mostly a free fan thing to do. If all modders charged for mods, then companies would feel the need to press charges and kill the entire community.

I'd say yes just because the customer should be allowed to modify their games however they see fit. The developer/publisher should just have the standard "Modifying the product expires the refund licensing, etc, etc" Basically, the dev washes their hand off of that one copy if it's modified.
That being said, I prefer and think it works best to simply have a donation option for the modder.

>paying for mods

Attached: becca_face_annoyed11.jpg (400x400, 34K)

if you believe in capitalism your answer is yes

what the fuck?

Attached: 2dfs4.png (356x392, 132K)

>allowed

lol if he makes it he is "allowed" to do whatever the fuck he wants with it.

They're selling their time. You own nothing in your job, yet you still demand your boss to pay you. How is that fair?

It's a free economy. If you don't like the price, then find someone that will do it for free.

Nah, but being able to donate to them is fair if they constantly make (good) mods or continously update a mod.
Straight up charging people for downloading a mod is retarded and if idiots actually buy it you'd have more modders trying to get paid for their shit.

As someone who has been modding Fallout and Skyrim to hell and back I say that modders should receive some reward for their efforts.
But Nexus has a donation option so its all fine.

That's fucking retarded. Then painting your car would also be illegal.

That's a different mod, the one that came out 3 weeks after the game is by maliwei777 and looks like this

Attached: Claire move animation2.webm (1020x1080, 2.98M)

I have never understood how much of a cuck you have to be to make mods for free. Only cucks give away their labor.

>labor

Attached: 1556039520730.jpg (500x500, 67K)

No. Fuck you.
Cars aren't sold the same way as games. Compare the buyer agreements ffs

depends what you're modding and how
if you add an entire new story, models and gear etc then yes, sure you can ask money if you want to be a bitch about it.

but if you customize ready made content like models and weapons? no, fuck you.
That's literally just taking art or pictures and editing it in photoshop,
sure, you can spend hours of work on your edits, but in the end you TOOK something someone else made and modified it so unless the original creator gets a cut, you're practically selling someone elses product with your name on it

Attached: 1407069869783.gif (191x184, 223K)

Let's be honest here. No one will ever donate unless the person makes a point of it to the extent that they look like a pathetic beggar.

People love to throw the word donate around so they can feel better about never having to pay for anything, because they think someone else will donate for everyone else. And no one ever does.

The buyer agreement can go eat shit. If you buy it, It's yours.

I have zero respect for mod makers. What kind of retard works for free like that.

People make mods for themselves too, you know. It's empowering changing something about the game you want changed yourself and not having to wait for another free mod author to make it and follow your every request.
Then you can just decide to share it with the rest of the world, for internet reputation points or for resume points (if it's something cool). Or just to have people pat you on the back. In the end, you are still doing it for yourself though. At least you should be; if you're not, you are indeed a cuck

People like you are why games are constantly released with performance-crippling DRM. Congrats doing more damage to consumers than you'll ever do to publishers.
And on that note, leave legal arguments to adults if you don't understand what you are and aren't legally able to do.

The hell does owning what you buy have to do with DRM.

I wouldn't be sure of that since nowadays people give their savings to streamers, but if anything, patreon seems the most "fair" way to charge people for your work while still having it available for everyone, people who pay get a special treatment like having a mod early or whatever.

>become a sellout
>make a few thousand bucks before your pay pigs start constantly leaking your custom assets
>get an e-mail
>it's a cease and desist order from some corporate lawyer
Why risk bringing down that kind of heat when the pay off is so shitty and short-term?

Attached: 1550332338833.png (1700x1500, 469K)

>wanting to get paid for your work
>sellout
The fuck?

>Customer should have ownership over their products
>Publisher forces DRM measures to ensure this doesn't happen
>Ergo, I should support the idea that I don't own a product
That's not your argument, right?

>retard doesn't even know how his own argument is used
Ok, I'll be nice.
>piratefags claim that owning a disc or digital copy means they own the game, not a license to use it
>said brainless faggots rip and distribute copies online for other people because they believe they should be able to
>this is called piracy and publishers don't like it
>DRM is ramped up even when it can be cracked and there are zero signs of it ever slowing down
>piratefags blame the publishers for not letting them pirate or distribute games
In that vain, modders also have no inherent legal rights unless stated in the EULA, or in some form by IP owners. Fair Use is a defense, not a right that stops any claim from being made.

did you make it user

Theres a difference between artists and modders. A lot of "modders" are not artists and just download already made shit and resell it after making it work in the game. Fuck no they don't deserve my money unless they made it from scratch for the most part.

absolutely fucking based

because they made claire and the game so the rights are theirs to sell, yes very cool post

>sacrificing passion for money
That is selling out.

This
Look at the cesspit called youtube nowadays
You introduce getting payed and it turned all out for the worst. Its like a post apocalyptic scenario right now over there

If I buy a comic, of which I have many, there's a notice inside the vast majority that the work isn't to be posted without authorisation, in part or whole. Comicfags, moviefags etc, understand the difference between owning the medium on which something is held, and having the right to distribute. It's just Yea Forumstards who can't.

>pirating games is the same as mods
What the fuck does this have to do with mods? Are you insane?

I offered passion to my landlord to pay the rent.
It wasn't quite the conversation I expected.

>Corporations ask for money for shit products
>"mmm yes Capcom let me swallow your dick with my ass"
>Individuals ask for money to improve these products
>"WTF THIS SHOULD BE ILLEGAL ONLY CORPORATE COCK IS ALLOWED IN MY BUTTHOLE"
The absolute state of Yea Forums

best mods are always free

>pirates claim they own the game itself and use this to defend illegal distribution and downloading
>some modders claim they own the game itself and use this to charge for alterations to a work they don't own
There are fewer words now. Does that help?

t. blabit

>improve
>implying

Pretty much this. I'll always play a mod someone was self motivated to make over some cheap t&a russian shit made for a quick buck. Usually is soulless anyways with some shit ripped daz3d model. FULLY MODELED VAGINA

It was certainly fun playing Warcraft 3 custom maps. Seems like they had fun making them for people to enjoy. A key element missing in today's video games.

But that doesn't mean a pirated game is the same as a mod. A mod is original work. Are you being dense on purpose or are you really just stupid?

Yes, that would also apply to a video game. But if you want to tear a page of the comic and glue something else, you can because it's yours. The customer simply relinquishes their rights to complain to the publisher if they willingly modify the product.
Game ownership would follow the same thing. Not allowed to copy it with the intent of selling it or distributing it. But in this case you're distributing a mod, something not created by the company. The customer should be allowed to modify their game however they see fit. The only exception I can think is multiplayer games since certain changes like modifying stats means affecting other player's games. And even then, some leeway can be allowed, as seen in TF2 where you can change just about every model and sound, you're just not allowed to change actual stats. Although companies in this case can jut make dedicated servers for a free for all while leaving their own servers with much stricter rules.

never, it will never support custom animations let alone the scripting required for something like that

You have been only buying a license for longer then "games as a service" has been around.

>claire in a schoolgirl outfit is 150$
>or you can get her topless for free
What the fuck is this shit

>pirate the game for free
>pay some hobbyist 150 dollarydoos for a low-tier fetish outfit
>UHHH, TAKE THAT, CORPORATE FAT CATS

Honestly I think a lot of it has to do with the economy. As the American middle class has essentially evaporated over the past ~20 years, more and more people have stopped spending their free time making fun indie games/mods for the sake of fun, and instead are looking to monetize their code/game development skills.

>original
It's a derivative work based on something the modder doesn't have a legal right to charge for. To a certain extent, nor do they have a legal right to create the mod in the first place. The hobby exists at the whims of the IP owner, and people who charge for mods cheapen the actual merits modding has.

>clothes cost money
>being naked is free
is it really that hard to understand?

No, the same reason why comedic prints of the Mona Lisa are dirt cheap. You can't profit off someone else's work. Modding is just as the name implies - modifying something that already exists. You're not actually creating something, you're changing something that's been made

Now, total conversion mods on the other hand, deserve some form of recognition. Maybe in the form of donations. Only if the mod is officially endorsed by the devs can a modder charge for their work.

Otherwise, we're back where we started - horse armor.

>muh cheapening
Really it just sounds like you're ass mad you might have to pay for a horsedick mod instead of getting it for free.

They have a right to sell, and you have a right to not buy, and then download it for free somewhere.

Attached: 1550956043544.jpg (968x732, 64K)

>But if you want to tear a page of the comic and glue something else, you can because it's yours
But this only reinforces my point about the medium (the book). Not sure what you're arguing. Also see what I posted here Unless it's something like ARMA, the mod would be derivative, not original.

It depends, does your mod work without the help of other mods? then you can charge.
The problem lies in games like skyrim where a couple mods are mandatory for other mods to even be created.

$150 is more expensive than finding a prostitute that looks like Claire, buying her that outfit, then fucking her repeatedly. Just imagine paying for a virtual costume.

Yes, but the free market will decide what it's worth.

>$150
LMAO

doesn't mean i can't criticize it

No, I just think modders, pirates and fan-artists all overvalue themselves and don't know shit about what they're authorised to do. This thread's proving me right.
Also, paying for retarded mods instead of getting high-effort free ones is stupid.

Man it took fucking forever for you fucks to get to the right answer. 50 communist posters until the real American posts.
You should be free to do what you want in this situation, but that doesn't make paid mods a something that's good for the consumers.

I think it all comes down to arguing what a "derivative work" is. Or what these modders are actually doing.

Scenario 1:
>Someone models and textures a new variant of armor for a game. It's all done from scratch in a modeling/texturing program, and is entirely cosmetic. It's in a universal 3d format that could be used anywhere. He charges money for the file and you can drop it in your game folder to make it appear in your game.

Scenario 2:
>Someone codes an entirely new game mode not present in the game itself. He sells an exe that requires the game files to run, but on it's own does nothing.

Scenario 3:
>Someone uses an in game map editor to make a new map/arena for the game. He makes a bunch of these and sells the proprietary map files for other people to use in their game

Which of these is OK to sell, if any? Why?

>overvalue themselves
Who cares what they charge if retards pay for it? I don't get when people argue about high prices because if people are paying it then it's those dumbasses you should be mocking not the artists

I remember when community recognition was the reward

kys commie

Not necessarily. In this case it's basically a reskin. But what if it was just a Donut Steel character replaced in the game?
Personally, I always side with more player to the consumer. Plus, I believe mods are healthy for the community. Some are small changes, some are big to the point where they're entirely different games. And I believe that if a modder really believes their work is worth money, they should be allowed to be paid for it.
But this comes with a caveat. First, I understand the issue of the publisher wanting a cut, specially if the change is minimal but to run the mod in the first place, you need to buy the game so the publisher is getting paid. And I believe that it's much better for modders to simply have a donation button. It keeps the integrity and purpose of mods while making sure these people get at least the monetary possibility. The guy who did the script mod for Skyrim which basically fixes the damn game should be compensated in some way, in my opinion.
Also I only support piracy for preservation and believe there should be some institution that got game files directly from the developer on release. The institution wouldn't release the games, obviously, until the game is no longer being distributed.
Sorry for the long post.

Is this real? Those prices are hilarious

>Personally, I always side with more player to the consumer.
Meant "more power to the consumer". Ups.

>"People should make things for me FOR FREE!"

Fucking retards man.
Its already bad that you can't do shit yourself, but you also want capable people to do it for free? Get out.

It was the reward because legally modders couldn't receive a cent for what they made beyond """donations""""

The commie is the one who thinks they should be able to sell derivative works without paying the original creator.
Modding should be a hobby. As soon as a modder gets his head stuck up his own ass and begins to call what they are doing "work" they should fuck off and stop making mods. Just like the wood burning faggots you can see on etsy's peddling their wares

>$150
>for the occasional glimpse of schoolgirl Claire's bald snatch
Clearly a sound investment.

Attached: 1549467631622.jpg (1951x1080, 345K)

What the fuck is an HD neck?

>you just want free shit
Kek, every time. Even more hilarious when the modders dont even pay for half the software they use.

I'll mock anyone who charges for something when they don't have a right to. It's how I do.
Arguably, none. All three are made for a specific game the modder does not own rights to. The map files would probably require poking around in shit the devs don't want you to. Modding folders also isn't kosher per se. It has to be understood that modding is not a grey area. What you can and can't do is in black and white. Any variations will be written or stated somewhere.
Modding in a character is still modifying without auth. No difference. Mods can certainly improve things and I appreciate functional mods (fixes, cut content, etc) but no kind of mod gives them the authority to demand payment, legally or ethically, unless it's in tandem with the IP owner. That's how it is, and I don't plan to ever donate to a modder, or pay for a mod. The constant push that they "deserve" cash for unauthorised, derivative work is annoying.
Get a job

Just like with digital art!

Attached: 1554040369515.jpg (1000x1128, 206K)

>Being this much of a corporate bootlicker
I hope you're getting paid for this

Higher definition than a SD neck

I thought DRM was to stop piracy, not mods

And I hope modders don't get paid for ripping off people who put actual taxed hours into working in game studios.

>Defending game studios
Jesus fucking christ Yea Forums

I don’t think the devs make any money off of paid mods.

My point was that pirates use the same argument that
>I own the actual game code and assets so I can do what I want
Like the people here arguing that modders should be able to charge because they "own" the assets and therefore can charge for modifications. Pirates did more harm than good, and modders are going the same way

what damage are modders doing, tho?

>charging hundreds of dollars for individual smut mods
Christ wept. You might as well open up a Patreon account if you're gonna go full wegshitter mode.

Attached: 1553404121150.png (281x355, 48K)

Projecting much user, OP only wanted to spark discussion

I'm defending average Joe cube monkey, not execs. However, modders still have no legal rights.
I never said they did. What I meant was that modders are trying to profit from the work of people who have jobs, namely working on the games officially

mediafire.com/file/yjm6jwk2dt0a89d/Jill Re3 HD All Versions Premium Edition.rar

heres a good jill mod the creator is making money off pass it around.

but those people you’re claiming to defend are not effected by this at all. once the game is finished its more or less out of their hands, so they probably couldn’t care less if some modder made something else.

At the moment, calling publisher attention to themselves, which could result in trouble down the line. A paid SFV modfag got C & D'd a while back. Pretty sure some Betheseda game launched w/o mod support on ps4 because they wanted to limit potential issues but can't confirm.

Worth picking up RE2 if I just want to use the mods?

>modding in itself
Sure.
>making money off of something they spent the last 2, 3 years working on that they're never gonna see a cut of when the game wouldn't exist without them
Eeeeeehh. Possible, but that can and has gone either way

even so, they’re not going to make money from mods, so at best it’s a case of them not getting their feelings hurt, and that’s of course assuming its unfair.
sounds like even you don’t know if there are any real repercussions to this

I'm confused, why $150?

Even THE most expensive outfits in super jew games cost like $30 tops, which is already absurd.

Attached: 1465776863917.jpg (385x578, 36K)

My view's that paid, derivative mods should kick back a % to the publisher/developer. If the modder disagrees, fuck em. They have no right to profit or ask for cash to begin with, so their own view is moot.
>sounds like even you don’t know if there are any real repercussions to this
That's fair. The paid mods thing onky really happens because it's impossible to find and C and D everyone who makes them. For the consumer, the only real repercussion's a lack of support for using mods created by others tbf. Still, idc as long as modders read a fucking eula for once. If there are no setbacks for randos, that's cool. Doesn't mean modders should charge legally or otherwise tho

*only

If their work is 100% original then they should be allowed to sell it, the same as any other creative work. I'd rather they didn't but its not like I'm forced to buy paid mods.
Selling derivative works without obtaining a license is illegal, of course.

Either vastly overestimating the value of playing RE2 with the added novelty of gobbo-tier nudity, or ensuring at least one good payday before it gets freely distributed.

Attached: 1549633777896.jpg (739x610, 302K)

if you buy a car you own that copy, you can’t manufacture copies and give out/sell those copies.

Depends on how HORNY AND LONELY you are

Attached: 777mod.webm (1400x1080, 3M)

Milking as many NEET-bucks as possible from thirsty gamers. At least, that's how I rationalize it.

The other user claimed that modding being illegal was tantamount to getting your car painted being illegal. I was displaying the vast difference between those two scenarios.

is this guy the only person who has made any mods for Sherry?

Attached: file.png (1920x1080, 424K)

that money’s going to publishers, so whether you realize it or not you’re crying for the execs. hell, if anything paid mods going mainstream would incentivize publishers cutting back on hiring devs for DLC content, so that % would screw over the little guy.

how easy is to mod the game?

the only difference is that one is hardware while the other is software.
mods = paintjob, piracy = manufacturing more copies of the same car.
it was a false comparison when you brought up piracy

>"schoolgirl"
>wearing a necktie but there's no collar on the shirt

>charging this much money when he's just ripping stuff from other games
What a crook. I don't really care if someone wants to charge for mods, but most of these fuckers expect money for either mediocre work or work that isn't even theirs. I rarely see modders with original and well-made content ask for money.

Attached: 1544947214329.png (704x512, 302K)

>hell, if anything paid mods going mainstream would incentivize publishers cutting back on hiring devs for DLC content, so that % would screw over the little guy.
Depends on the difference in wage between the % and the pay for DLC content. Also, yeah, ofc cash would go to the IP owner, that's how IPs work. There's no scenario in which I support some fucknut charging for derivative mods to something he isn't working on in an official capacity. They are not. Authorised. To charge. I have zero sympathy for anyone who does.

>dolphin porn
>AGAIN
FUCK
WHEN WILL I EVER LEARN?

Attached: DAAAAAAUGHAAAAGHH.png (236x359, 92K)

When buying a car, you gain the legal ability to have it painted, unless for some reason stated otherwise.
When buying a game, you have no right to mod or distribute, unless it's stated so in the eula. Piracy also carries eula and offers no legal rights.
Learn your shit, child.

>straight-up charging for ripped assets
That's some scummy shit.

Attached: 1550242752431.jpg (586x606, 38K)

*piracy carries no eula

ok, not sure why you claimed to be trying to defend devs then.

Nope. They don't own the IP they are modding, and those who do could ban anyone using said mods at any time.

>there are actually people that would pay $35 to have a very shitty version of a Hatsune Miku MMD model in RE2
such is life.

>defending devs and pointing out that that IP owners have an intrinsic right to profit off their IPs are mutually exclusive
Just shut up. I may actually contract autism from you.

EULAs aren’t legally binding, tho.

Yes they are. They are like contracts

depends on the mod

In the case of mods you shouldn't be charging for them unless they're a whole new game from scratching using the game's engine (e.g. EYE Divine Cybermancy and other source games).

If you wanna make money as a modder just run a patreon or something, I see plenty of skyrim modders do it these days and it seems to work out for them.

your not defending any devs, and you contradict yourself by now acting like you care about the suits. your questionable claims are giving me autism

Why hope for 150 poor retards when you can hope for 1 rich retard?

lawdepot.com/law-library/faq/eula-faq-united-states/#.XNoREVPTWdM

I think the normal schoolgirl mod costs $35 but the "going commando" one without panties costs $150 (on SALE!)

>allowed
Yes
>respected
No

they literally aren’t.

I said shut up. Paid modders profiting off shit they don't own is illegal, and a detriment to devs with actual jobs, *and* the IP owners. It's not hard to understand. Paid modders are faggots.
QED

...

>I said shut up.
no
>and a detriment to devs with actual jobs
explain
>and* the IP owners
*and* now you run with that. earlier you were denying it

it snot

Attached: file.png (498x153, 16K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-user_license_agreement#Enforceability_of_EULAs_in_the_United_States
they’re a gray area

Not when the mod isn't a original creation like the majority of FF14's paid mods.

Yes, which is why saying "They aren't legally binding" is wrong. Under the right circumstances courts have upheld them.

they have also denied some of them. so just because a EULA says “you can’t do this” does not necessarily mean thats legally the case.

>user doesn't understand what he read
Read the section you linked again. On a case by case basis, some eulas (shrinkwraps mainly) haven't been upheld. Others have. This does not mean that the EULA as a whole is a grey area. It means that badly delivered ones aren't enforceable in good conscience, but properly delivered/whatever EULAs are unmistakably legally binding. As in, you break the law if you break the agreement. That's not grey.

Albeit, it does apparently depend on the court but I wouldn't call it a grey area. It's more discretion and interpretation.

>no definition of any kind
Shit like this makes me question the legitimacy of fellow armpit fetishists. You might as well fap to Stretch Armstrong.

Attached: small-stretch-armstrong-oty__80120.1544309829.jpg (800x800, 38K)

barely any mods can be called professional. even the good one make yurojank look polished.

not true, the really good costumes are Capcom DLC quality or better in this case

Attached: modder vs capcom.jpg (1920x2160, 717K)

if you found out your agreement had some line about never being able to modify your vehicle, would you just take it sitting down?

That bitch's titties are like the wicked witch of the west after a wet T-shirt contest.

He'd take it lying down and lick their boots at the same time

fuck no
but there are guillible monkeys willing to pay big money for some of them, so modders charging for them are smart

Not unless it uses Capcom assets.

Idealism is cute and all, but that's not reality. Everything from the AKC to the telephone to the fast food cheeseburger started as a work of passion. Monetization is inevitable, because finding new ways to make money is also a passion for some people. You'll get over it.

If it's something like patreon where it's more like a form of tipping to get access to everything else they have, sure
if it's like OP's pic where you pay2download per mod, that's some shit

>I suck corporate and goverment cock
Thanks for your contribution faggot

mods should always be free
donations are fine if its for something like keeping private server running but thats it
fuck valve jews for even introducing this concept

>paid mods should be free
>supports tipping method

how does Yea Forums not see how this as hypocritical?

Attached: cant-some1else.jpg (420x336, 36K)

link to site

>

Attached: 1557422552493.webm (1920x1080, 1.08M)

>2 customer reviews
>he made at least $300 off this, possibly more since people could've bought it and just not left a review
I should get into making games lewd for money.