why aren't videogames depicting dinosaurs correctly?
Why aren't videogames depicting dinosaurs correctly?
Scientists still aren't sure how they actually looked like.
why do you make shitpost threads on basically every board?
I bet you still believe out of africa, too.
dinosaurs are a myth
Because dinosaurs didn't exist
Have you READ any of the myths? Humans are a myth too.
this is a myth
>implying we need another birb game instead of 90s monster revival
kill yourself
dinosaurs are a social construct.
Radiocarbon dating is fake science, the earth is 6,000 years old and people lived alongside dinos when they were known as dragons.
And the earth is flat
Now post cute raptor men with feathers.
nobody is scared of a 20 foot chicken
That aint what dinosaurs looked like
You mean them having sex with humans?
Bird dinos are lame
so why didnt Noah put any dinosaurs on the Ark?
checkmate biblefag.
*blocks your path*
youtube.com
Half true. RC dating works, it just does not go far. Humans did indeed live with dinos, but it was not how you would imagine. Megafauna and megaflora died due to drastic increase in gravity, which is not a constant and can be modified if a planet changes position in space.
All of this is tru.
the earth is also a myth
U dum
Cause he was a scallie
I love it when artists improve the imperfections of real life and make the monsters cute CUTE.
your mom is a my
no, both of my parents are real. but their parents are a myth
Live for a 1,000 years and we'll see who's dumm.
>Dinosaurs lived during some of the hottest centuries of the Earth (disregarding when it was literally lava)
>Retards think they would have been covered in feathers that would have over heated the shit out of them
>
The only dinosaurs that had feathers were theropods. Even then only certain ones definitively had them. If JP were remade today the only ones that should be poofy are the raptors.
>It's not clear whether derived tyrannosaurs would have been covered in scales, feathers, or a combination of both. A few small skin impressions have been described for Tyrannosaurus which show small pebbled skin; close relatives, Tarbosaurus and Gorgosaurus are known to have similar pebbled skin. Skin impressions from the closely related Gorgosaurus are reported to show both smooth, naked skin and scales. A 2017 study looked at a variety of tyrannosaurid skin impressions and came to the conclusion that derived tyrannosaurs were probably scaly over most their body.
>What complicates the issue is that most coelurosaur fossils show feathers covering thier bodies and inference would suggest the same for tyrannosaurs. The smaller basal tyrannosauriod Dilong and the larger tyrannosauroid Yutyrannus also preserve feather impressions. This raises the probability that, derived tyrannosaurs had a mix of feathers and scales on different parts of the body or that feathers were lost as individuals reach maturity.
>A study published in 2017 looked at the texture of a tyrannosaurs skull bones and suggested that there may have been large, flat crocodile-like skin cracks/scales on the front of the snout of tyrannosaurids. The details on the head in this restoration are based on an similar interpretation of bone texture by Mark Witton in which he suggests that certain areas of the head were covered in a cornified sheath as well as scales.
Dinosaurs died out 60,000 BC.
Let time and "scientific" progress decide if that is bullshit or not.
>There are people right now. RIGHT NOW. Who think +2C from global warming is the end of human civilization as we know it
vultures are cooler than dinosaurs
Some of the information presented in ITT is factual.
no that's gay
Why can't dino dudes just have skin and hair like people?
I'm just saying, it's fucking retarded to think something like the monstrous Tyrannosaurus would have been covered in feathers. And then why does nobody ever bring up the herbivorous dinosaurs when talking about feathers? Do these same people seriously think giant feathered giraffes were running around?
you wouldnt.... would you?
For some yeah. For example we arent sure if T-rex was fully covered in some kind of feathers or proto feathers but some body parts were clearly covered in something.
Feathers are like dinosaur fedoras. These pseudo scientists keep changing their story and every time they open their mouths we're supposed to nod enthusiastically and forget that they said something completely different with similar conviction a couple of days ago. Don't ask any questions or suggest that they'll just change their mind later, because that's "anti science". Because this is the truth now until they need more funding later. Be brave and say no to dino larping.
>it's fucking retarded to think something like the monstrous Tyrannosaurus would have been covered in feathers
It wasn't.
>And then why does nobody ever bring up the herbivorous dinosaurs when talking about feathers?
Because the herbivores weren't the ones who turned into birds. Chickens came from pic related, not Triceratops.
I said men.
Yeah, when we gonna see some real representation?
The idea of a dino being able to talk like a parrot is genuinely horrifying
>birds can't be scar-
Modern feathers are completely shaped and designed to enable the creature with them to fly.
Why would a creature who probably has no flying ancestors and can't fly itself have "feathers" aside from the few that could fly.
If dinosaurs did have some sort of shit sticking out of their skin, they probably did not look like feathers.
Because scientists can only guess what they looked like.
>just had chicken thighs for supper
>see thread
fuck dinosaurs
>Ostrich
>Emu
Flightless birds with feathers
Damn that's one cool looking dog you got there.
Because sick ass pimp feathers gets you the wet and tight dino cloaca.
Hell yes I would
i like birds of prey, raptors, etc. of course i would never own one. i do kind of hate how they, symbolically, are associated with evil (vultures, owls, etc). because the birds themselves are quite intelligent and charming.
>those vids of that ostrich cloaca getting fucked
ummf
>Chris' relationship with Walnut has lasted 10 years, longer than any of hif human relationships thus far.
How the fuck can h*man women compete at this point? This is fucking unfair to them.
Vultures are good boys
fluffy boi
it's still unclear wether dinosaurs were avians, reptiles or mammals.
let them depict them as they think.
>tfw no tiny dinosaur pet
>It seemed like it most might be possible to train her to accept AI without restraint
>she started soliciting me to mate by turning her back, opening and trembling her wings and lowering her head
>the stimulation seemed to be her reward
>she would make a soft trill noise that I refer to as 'purring' since it reminds me of a conte ted cat
I'm feeling things I don't want to feel
Lots of animals are being neglected by social media personalities. I dont know if this exact person is neglecting that owl. But many people over feed their rodents and post "cute" videos on twitter where their rodent struggles to do basic things. Its not cute its abuse. Lots of these people are asian and asians simply dont have the real estate to meaningfully house and take care of most avian species. Lots of westerners do the same though, they buy birds and try to record them doing wacky and zany stuff but of course how many people know how to take care of this species?
in most countries, having a large bird of prey is illegal anyways
id like a turkey vulture as a pet, but im both totally not equipped, and legally not allowed to anyways
>the stimulation seemed to be her reward
>ywn have a loving bird wife who adores the feeling of you touching her and being inside her
>they are big lizards boys and they just dissaperared
>they are big chickens boys and they become smaller
imagine believeng the dinosaur hoax
because they actually look really fucking lame compared to the dragon-like creatures in jurassic park
user, can you tell me what lead tastes like? I've always wanted to know.
Holy fuck
No, it's very clear what they are
>you will never use your dexterous human hands and knowledge of an animals anatomy to give it sexual pleasure that is normally impossible for it's species
This man is based and dinopilled
Actually it is
This. Not a single full dinosaur skeleton has been found yet the scientists claim to have perfect understanding of how they looked like.
Reminder that no one cares about "muh dino accuracy" in movies & shit besides youtube and discordfags
Why are there suddenly zoofags? I thought we hated even furries.
"we" as in who?
its mostly ironic hehe
yeah haha i wonder how would it feel like having sex with an ostrich haha i wonder how would the feeling be teaching the insides of ostrich cloaca with my penis be haha
I want to feel Anjanath's fluffy back and giant thighs
I want people who like World because they want to fuck the monsters to be euthanized.
3/4 of Sue the Tyrannosaurus Rex's skeleton was discovered, including its full skull. That's breddy gud for something that before the concept of apes or monkeys existed, let alone humans.
I'm literally older than the concept of aging and you want to call me dumm? The last time I kicked the ass of a dumbass like you, the beating's length was measured in epochs.
youtube.com
Hello, God. Always wanted to tell you that you are are tiny insignificant faggot.
>what it sounds like
>5 minutes long
fuck that shit
But it explains why it would sound like it did.
I thought feathered raptors were a general consensus among paleontologists.
>ITT: Asshurt MUH 90'S KIDS upset Dinosaurs don't look like they did in Jurassic Park
>They explain multiple times that the dinosaurs in JP are genetically altered to meet the public perception of how dinosaurs looked and acted
>People STILL wont shut up about them not being accurate
They are not supposed to be accurate in the first place! They might as well be monsters! Thats the whole point!
Few know that.
The audience was supposed to be part of the few, but they willfully decided not to.
The audience were meant to be the general public, who GENERALLY know nothing.
It is
This is just a retcon because they screwed up
>Dinosaurs with frog dna mixed in
They were always fucked up and they were never dinosaurs.
I had so much hype for Jurassic World: Evolution. How did they fuck up so bad?
Wu literally spells it out in the first novel, they reused the dialogue later for Jurassic World. The raptors were going to have flickering snake tongues to get the point across until Jack Horner got pissed and said it went against the notion of trying to portray them as birdlike.
And they evolved from birds that could fly.
yeah, that was literally crichton saying "I know I am making these mistakes here regarding their appearance so I'll put this failsafe here to retcon this shit in the future".
Also in the book there is a passage that tells on how Hammond demanded the animals were as close as possible to the real thing while Wu wanted to make them slower and safer.
Why did china kill ARK
tfw they will never remake JP1 but keeping it super true to the novel.
That would have to be like an HBO 6 episode miniseries
>HOW THEY ACTUALLY LOOKED
>WHAT THEY ACTUALLY LOOKED LIKE
YOU DON'T ADD 'LIKE' WHEN YOU USE THE WORD 'HOW' MOTHER FUCKING ESL MOTHERFUCKERSs shjfsdhkfkjksdh
There's some pretty horrific stuff in there, they'd never go for it. They'd never make a JP movie not be PG-13.
Why would a seven ton animal need feathers
Because, like women, the real ones fucking suck.
>ywn have a cute little theropod pet
life is cruel sometimes
Sinosauropteryx a cute & would be the perfect sized adventure bro. Either that or a dromaeosaurid.
nah but it will be the end of rich people's beach side mansions which is why we all need to put the work in to stop it