Tell me hermione, if our series was so good why we never got good games?

tell me hermione, if our series was so good why we never got good games?

Attached: 1552162436637.png (970x546, 953K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oelDCr3P7yk
youtube.com/watch?v=GNEk4-R_B5k
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because harry, our series was actually terrible and the author didn't bother with world-building until the 6th book... and I'm black, so why are you talking to a photo of you with a white girl and calling her "hermoine?"

Because most if not all successful non Vidya IPs are handled by corporate companies that are here to exploit how guillible you, especially as a child, were by making a low effort game & rack up quick buck, Harry.
Most of the people working on the Vidya Industry also wish to create, or at worst take inspiration from other mediums.

Order of the phoenix and halfblood prince were actually pretty good, the oler ps1 titles too

Merula thread?

Attached: 1537910388106.png (680x649, 384K)

If Star Trek is better than Star Wars why is that it never had any memorable videogame?

Attached: starwars-vs-startreck.jpg (500x355, 30K)

Lego Harry Potter wants to have a word with you

not so fucking fast potter

Attached: Harry-Potter-The-Chamber-Of-Secrets-PS2.png (433x600, 148K)

I'd like to have sex with Emma Watson desu.

But most of the Harry Potter games are vastly superior to the books or movies.

Shut up, Dukat.

FLIPENDO

I don't care what anyone says, sorcerers stone for PS1 was good, fuck those circlejerking wannabe critics

this

GBC RPGs were lit

Both the PS1 games, the first 3 PS2 and handheld games and the games for books 5 and 6 were good.

>

Attached: witch.png (305x187, 145K)

Why didn't the "wizards" just cast themselves out of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

a-at least the books were good though

"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1482159788606.jpg (1623x2886, 1.54M)

It is hard to make a good game based on one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1477860899336.jpg (1623x2886, 1.27M)

>harry potter
>good

I'm a boomer where kids were reading harry potter when I was already on greater and better things. Harry potter is just a kids book that zoomers grew up on so they have rose colored glasses for it.

Attached: 1532786765490.jpg (251x250, 8K)

Blessed "No!" poster

>if our series was so good
It isn't.

wew

Attached: dsd.png (328x55, 4K)

> zoomers

The first book came out in 1997

Why didn't the writer hack put this two together? Makes no sense

Remember when movie tie-in games had soul?

youtube.com/watch?v=oelDCr3P7yk

Attached: 1554074240339.gif (500x278, 790K)

based autism

Quidditch World Cup was the greatest sports game ever made, cuck.

Attached: fuck you lis.gif (245x340, 1.97M)

>The trading side quest
I never wanted them to end. It was beyond fun exploring Hogwarts, talking to everyone you met, trying to find the next person who wants the trading card or the gloves or whatever else you've just been given so you can find the next step in the quest.

Attached: 1485143147008s.jpg (122x125, 3K)

it was too easy in the hardest difficulty for my young self

Attached: 1539448750756.jpg (1280x720, 69K)

Beg you pardon?

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 112K)

She felt sorry for Ron. Always just the third wheel, never really doing anything useful.

Attached: 1527516950854.jpg (1525x555, 234K)

I mean Harry Potter as a series was at best mediocre, but mostly absolute just sort of unremarkable. Unironically I have a better time reading shitty isekai light novels then I did reading Harry Potter.

too old series

Apparently she regrets not doing that

>reading and enjoying LNs
>thinking your opinion on anything matters

Did she ever state in one of her many many twitter rants why she didn't have them end up together?
They always worked much better together than anyone else.

I would just like to let you know that I have never watched a single Harry Potter film, nor read any of the books. I am also more than 3 decades old.

But Hermione is black

I've played one HP game a long time ago, enjoyed it, but now I don't even remember what game it was.
I haven't watched Star Trek, but I think I've played demo of Star Trek: Away Team, maybe I should check out full game and see if it was good.
Yes

Attached: wurgh.png (984x1310, 1.08M)

>fuck annoying old hag or prime redhead pusy

what a tough choice

based

because star trek isn't about action and you can't make a good game about space diplomacy unless it's name is twilight imperium

I forgot that Hermoine is black now, thanks for the remind

Shut up. HP 1,2, 3 were good. So was Harry Potter World Cup.

This.
If you've ever unironically read a dogshit harem isekai LN kill yourself.

What if i just read a not harem isekai then? Does parodies count?

are ginny pussies also red pube haire?

What are HP 1 and 2 for PS1?

Was that supposed leak of a Harry Potter RPG debunked yet?

flippin' dope games, or should I say FLIPENDOpe games

>Armada, Bridge Commander, BotF
>no good games

Attached: 1546105148968.jpg (1024x1024, 105K)

Attached: 1527260743544.png (1200x655, 565K)

Multiplayer was fantastic tho

No its a real game in development

The best and comfiest HP games ever that people meme just because the models don't look too great.

it's weird how HP3 nailed HP pretty well then HP4 changed everything so radically.

>now
She was always black, friend

As far as games adapted from books and movies go, Harry Potter's got one of the best line-ups around. There's like, Star Wars and Witcher that competes with it and that's it?

I want redhead cunny.

definitely a lie, you could literally just make mass effect in the star trek universe and it'd work, have a small research vessel as the focus. and the gameplay is mostly dialogue and planet exploration with a bit of combat or action sequences, there just isn't the money behind it to make it good.

what about this thing? Will it be good Yea Forums?
youtube.com/watch?v=GNEk4-R_B5k

Nah, I don't enjoy them. But I'd rather read the most generic of generic isekai plot over Harry Potter.
The only purpose I have for reading light novels at this point is if I get into a specific series and I can't wait for the next episode or chapter to come out for it.

The Star Citizen of Harry Potter

because emma watson fucks jews irl

BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT THE WRONG HERMIONE GOV

Attached: 2._l-r_paul_thornley_ron_noma_dumezweni_hermione_and_jamie_parker_harry_at_the_palace_theatre._photo (768x433, 43K)

yo Prisoner of Azkaban for the GC was tight as hell. Really good puzzles, and you got to use all 3 of them. Then GTAV ripped off their character switching dynamic and nobody bowed down to suck HP's dick it was a real shame

Because Ron would lack even more agency. Poor bastard is stuck in his brother's and Harry's shadow.

The only way to make an interesting HP game now that the story is over is to make a bully spiritual successor Hogwarts edition

Can't we just get some expanded universe shit sometime? Would be much more fun.

"No!"Mind

Attached: Isildur enters a harry potter thread.jpg (1280x720, 65K)

>/hpgg/ thread is dehd
LMAO

The Star Trek VR game looks pretty cool

Test

Fuck you the first three games were good.

OH NO NO NO NO

Attached: 1531919925814.png (841x703, 705K)

Because you touch yourself at night harry!

TIME TO LAUGH AT THOSE MERUKEKS

Attached: 1527715084462.png (933x933, 986K)

Like what? More monsters or how Wizards act outside of the UK? HP is fucked in that regard because Rowling named the series after the protagonist.

Attached: 1531377676848.png (690x688, 936K)

is this a bot that triggers everytime harry potter is mentioned?

They are already trying to rebrand to wizarding world. More stuff about different characters and places in the world would help this.

it'd make a good open-world RPG
that's been discussed here before though

>the author didn't bother with world-building until the 6th book

world building isn't just big exposition dumps about a bunch of extraneous shit. the first Harry Potter is actually an example of world building done very well. it's why it was so successful

nice lie, too bad it's not true

it's the closest thing Yea Forums has to a good meme, don't bully

>world building in the first book
This dude straight up thought the whole wizarding world was just the school and the surrounding area lmao

Nice counter argument, too bad it's shit.

>90% chibi shit
>good

nope

No, just one really lonely faggot

Lego Harry Potter was basically a metroidvania in the open world parts

did anyone else think that apparating and stuff kind of broke the series?

HP 1, 2, maybe 3 and 5 were all awesome. 1 and 2 were fucking fantastic, beautiful, colourful, cheerful games. The quidditch game was fun as hell too.

Do you think Ron ever felt uncomfortable seeing Harry's rapscallion lopsided grin, flashing a row of teeth full of his sisters flaming pubes?

I'd be uncomfortable personally.

Lots of the magic is stupid if you think about it for more than 5 seconds. Just ignore it and accept that it isn't a focus.

This. Harry potter it's just a glorified childrens book

lurk more

you talking shit?

Attached: 1500420808086.png (248x459, 249K)

as I expected mobagenignogs swarmed this thread like the pajeet cockroaches they are

nah, he's right. apparition ruins the relatability of magic. same with hermione's time travel gadget in the third book. magical powers need to remain "grounded" so they create a world where cool shit is possible but you can't just do ANYTHING. same reason Star Wars is better than Star Trek.

Attached: 1554494921735.png (123x159, 2K)

what was his fucking problem?

Attached: malfoy.jpg (1080x1216, 82K)

Name one good movie that has a good game.

God of war 2018

Star Wars I guess?

based harry potter und die kammer du schrekens

the only reason I came into this shitty thread, thanks lads

Attached: 1546930262310.jpg (768x768, 73K)

>tfw a Persona styled Harry Potter game would be fucking perfect, but will never happen.

Star Wars as a few, so does Alien, the 90s Disney movie games from Capcom were also great

Attached: 1530584651243.png (688x804, 706K)

>HP basedboy tries to explain world-building
That's cute.

Star Wars vidya is practically its own genre, honestly.

The Return of the King

Spiderman 2

Based

Attached: Dany_has_the_shits.jpg (780x676, 95K)

Toy Story 2

Attached: 36802-Disney's_Toy_Story_2_-_Buzz_Lightyear_to_the_Rescue-3.jpg (635x475, 29K)

>tfw a Persona styled Harry Potter game would be fucking perfect, but will never happen.

Check out Fire Emblem 3 Houses

First two games were good. I don't remember the third, but I do remember Goblet of Fire changed the format and was shit
I remember seeing the trailer for Death Hallows and thinking that turning Harry Potter into a third person shooter had merit. I doubt the game was any good though

Hell yeah. Fuck that kite

Attached: 1529392087751.gif (298x252, 72K)