>Royal """"""""""Rat"""""""""" Authority
What did they mean by this?
Royal """"""""""Rat"""""""""" Authority
Other urls found in this thread:
RRA is cute
CUTE
George Soros
>Royal (((((((((Rat))))))))) Authority
if you were to show me a picture of that boss and ask what I thought its species was, I'd probably say it was a big rat monster.
The ears, tail, and fur give it away. I don't know why everyone has a big issue with this boss having longer than normal rat legs in a game with fucking dragons, anus faced tree giants, and a big spooky ghost in a chasm.
Looks like some shitty hyenadon creature
it looks like a dog though
Have you never ever in your life seen a rat before?
I read somewhere that DS2 has a horrendous translation done by multiple people
There's a difference between having made up fantasy creatures in your game, and putting in a dog and calling it a rat.
the dog is the authority over the rats, duhhh
>user hasn't seen vermin as big as dogs in real life
I envy you user.
They can be as big as dogs but they won't look like dogs.
I think ds2 wouldn't be considered so bad if they had removed that heath bar system.
Yea fuck gutter too it was definitely worst area in all 6 games.
It still would have felt like ass to just play and run around and attack and shit, but yeah I can't agree with anyone who even remotely says the health bar system is good.
Is this the best example of a Souls boss where victory is determined based on the first 10 seconds or so? I always feel like I end up dying if I don't kill the little faggots asap. The fight is pretty much mine once they're gone. The only other boss that I can think of that's like this is the Capra Demon and his dumb dogs.
Health bar mechanics exist in three of the four Souls games. You don't complain about DaS3's Ember because it's presented differently, while DaS2's progressive hollowing ruins your pretty character the more you suck at the game.
Capra isvl the only other I can think of. Maybe the Archdragon Peak Wyvern, depending on how you look at it.
That was totally unique from all 3 games.
Ds1 had best system of humanity and didn't give shit and ds3 had ember which increased health incredibly.
This ds2 hell used to decrease and decrease until certain point.
They wanted to reuse boss animations but a rats model wouldn't 'fit' correctly. DS2 was the pinnacle of mediocrity, I still struggle to remember what bosses were in the game, despite there being fucking 30+ of them. Only a couple were actually noteworthy.
DS2 had the best RPG mechanics, PVP, and had a huge variety of areas and bosses. Giant Laser Spider, Scorpion Woman, Skeleton Army, Royal Ratdog, I really liked most of the bosses. It just had low production values.
DS3 is completely soulless. It reused assets and the entire game is "I REMEMBER THAT FROM DS1! I CLAPPED WHEN I SAW IT!"
>Maybe the Archdragon Peak Wyvern
I can see that, yeah. Though embarrassingly, I've fucked up on the plunge part before. I guess Nito can be like this too if you have a divine weapon, and stay by the entrance. Once his skellies are gone and he shuffles over to you, there's very little he can do that's a threat.
This
It’s basically the royal rat catcher.
You’ve people never heard of rat dogs?
DS2 reused more assets than DS3. DS3 has a very tiny portion of Anor Londo used for the boss, DS2 shamelessly reskins multiple DS1 bosses.
Yes, I think bosses like Flexile Sentry had a completely different name.
You're wrong but we don't expunge people from society for being wrong, so you're safe for now. A few years ago, I would have tried to have a discussion with you but I've come to realize that D2Fags are just the worst, and they just cannot be reasoned with under any circumstances. Their whole shtick is to claim that an objectively inferior game is the best in its trilogy and feel special in doing so, because they're in the minority. (Like that somehow matters)
because rats are a thing that exist, while the other things you described are not
>the game that's a direct followup of the first game keeps referencing the game it's a direct follow up of. ITS SHIT
DS2 is unironically the New Vegas of Souls. The only people that hate on it are the retarded PC-babs that started with DS1 on PC.
pacarana
youtube.com
Except his tail looks like a rat tail, and actually drops as such when you kill him. You can then take his >Rat Tail< to the Rat King as a covenant item. Play the game before you shit up the thread with your reckless faggotry.
>That was totally unique from all 3 games.
The other guy is probably talking about DeS which does have health reduction mechanisms
>Ds1 had best system of humanity and didn't give shit
Humanity in DaS1 gave defense, retard
>and ds3 had ember which increased health incredibly
And the entire game is balanced around the embered health which means that if you lose it, it's the equivalent of being in ghost form in DeS or hollowed in DaS2. Don't fucking tell me that the Ringed City is meant to be played unembered.
It does, the lore is completely different in the Japanese version because they had 2-3 different companies translating it to English and one of them was garbage, so everything is inconstant.
cute
DS2fags should be killed. You're all so fucking obnoxious. Liking an objectively inferior game doesn't make you special because you're one of the retarded few, kys.
>you should be killed for not liking what I like
Cringe
Correct. Dark Souls didn't need any direct followups. They should have just moved on to Bloodborne and let DaS be a one and done thing like DeS.
It's a dog. It's the authority of the royal rats. What is the greatest threat to rats? Cats?
What beats cats? Dog.
Their authority is the power of their greatest enemies weakness.
that is a rat, retard
>It reused assets
2 has more reused assets than 3
>the entire game is "I REMEMBER THAT FROM DS1/DS2/DEMON'S/BLOODBORNE! I CLAPPED WHEN I SAW IT!"
fixed, it's a best of compilation of the past four games but for some reason people get really hung up on how a sequel references the games that came before it in the same series
You should be killed for having an IQ equal to 80.
It's not a good "compilation". It has the worst PVP in the series, limited RPG mechanics, had terrible magic at launch, and it's the most linear game.
>Calls everyone who doesn't like what they like retarded
>Gets told to kys for being so obnoxious
>Panics because you're being confronted
>Quickly becomes defensive and tries to take the moral high ground
>p-people are e-entilted to like what they l-like!
No, seriously. kys
Retard
See
DS2 is way better than DS3. DS2 has a shit ton of areas and bosses and is completely nonlinear, and PVP is great. Can't say any of those for the lazy cashgrab known as DS3.
He's the giant rat that makes all of the rules
>It has the worst PVP in the series
stopped reading there, don't tell me you actually defend soul memory
I see you've made the mistake of thinking they thought for longer than 2 seconds on this god forsaken shit boss
One fine day with a woof and a squeek
A baby was born and it cause a little creak
No blue buzzard
No three-eyed dog
Just a rattus doggus little ratdog
Ratdog
Ratdog
Yup, spotted the Prepare to Die bab.
>Inb4 "NO I SWEAR I IMPORTED A HONG-KONG COPY OF DEMON SOULS AND I EVEN PLAYED ALL THE KING'S FIELD GAMES TOO!"
Sad.
alone in the world was a little ratdog
It's widely agreed that DS3 has bad PVP. Estus heals are instant and the invasion numbers are stacked, nerfing invaders compared to previous games.
Everyone agrees that in its heyday DS2 had the most fun PVP. Magic was powerful and heals weren't instant, and you could make crazy builds. Soul memory had such huge brackets it didn't matter
You know I don't think that even DS2fags think that DS2 is the best in the trilogy. Its as if they just like the idea of being in a special little club because they're in the minority. Everytime they're confronted, its always either "you're just a DS babby" or it becomes a game of what-about-ism with comparing glaring problems with DS2 with minor flaws in DS and DS3. Least its nice to know that you're not retarded enough to fool yourself.
>Objectively
There's that word again
Misused, again
Oh, not another "everything is an opinion, everything is subjective" fag. Get cancer. You can be objectively wrong, you little fairy.
>My opinion is 100% factual and is in no way influenced by personal taste and emotion
I'd ask if you were twelve, but knowing that you'd defend Dark Souls 3, I already have my answer.
Are you fucking stupid? It looks like a canine, not a rat.
It's not the best Souls game.
DeS > Bloodborne > 2 > 1 > 3
I think people like you are just retards without context who massively overrate DS1. DS2 has much more to offer in every than DS1 outside of polish and autism shit like world consistency.
>Game with dozens of minor problems
>Game with hundreds of major problems
n-no! you c-can't claim that one is worse than t-the other! Its all subjective. Its a-all a matter of opinion.
...and you're probably an entitled middleclass little white boy that is typing this from his safe space, while Tyrone fucks your girlfriend in your own bed.
You can be wrong, and you probably will be wrong... Often. Get over it, faggot.
u stupid?
>I think people like you
Don't think, its not your strong point. I haven't even mentioned DS1 yet, you're just building a strawman because otherwise you'd get knocked the fuck out. Grow up.
BB >= 1 >= DeS > 3 > 2
>outside of polish and autism shit like world consistency
the only positive it has is quantity