What happened?

What happened?

Attached: 1532196814852.png (1680x932, 1.37M)

soul vs soulless

>they gave him a mustache
dropped

He looks like Kratos now?

Chinks

Attached: 1532196243046.png (1280x800, 1017K)

>okay boss we made it look worse, anything else?
>yeah make sure you also lower the framerate

Attached: 1532196111241.jpg (1278x717, 196K)

i think he looks fine :D

left looks better in this one

Attached: file.png (220x281, 49K)

Attached: 1551343711234.png (384x390, 175K)

Why is his monocle made out of flesh, was this shit inspired by Saya no Uta, what the fuck

Attached: 1532196826128.jpg (856x960, 47K)

It's a bottle dude

The remaster was using nothing but in engine assets while the original used pre-rendered cutscenes.

>pre-rendered cutscenes
Not a thing for the beginning of Arkham City

WAKE UP, WAKE UP MR GOY
WAKE UP AND BUY OUR SHITTY REMASTER

How? How did they manage to make it look worse? Jesus.

PC Mustard Race.

>buy return to Arkham collection for console
>"woohee I can't wait to play these comfy Batman games from last gen at 60fps with improved graphics"
>mfw seeing Batman's and Joker's face in Arkham Asylum
>mfw the extreme stutter when gliding around City
What the fuck is this shit, how unacceptable, how absolutely incompetent. This shit shouldn't even be released.

Attached: 1528451649481.jpg (317x800, 57K)

In the games he has a broken glass bottle shoved into his eye. It's a stupid design choice that for someone made more sense than making him without monocles because no one in the current century uses one

Sure but in the remaster it looks like there's skin growing out of it or something

>Running through all the Arkham games
>120% AK
>100% AA
>Get to Arkham City
>440 Riddles

what the FUCK were they thinking

Attached: fuckyou.png (800x992, 1.06M)

For anyone wondering, its because the cutscenes are in-game rather than rendered. The remaster's actual flaw was the ridiculous amounts of stuttering