AMD CPUs

>AMD CPUs

Attached: yakuza kiwami 2.png (924x837, 114K)

why do they always have the 2500k but not a 3570k?

damn, i gotta get a job soon.
my parts are becoming outdated.

>42 fps

77 more then 78
nice graphs u got buddy

and here's the GPU test

Attached: yakuza kiwami 2 gpu.png (899x964, 98K)

There are people who don't use Nvidia/Intel

Attached: 1521555622427.jpg (399x385, 44K)

TIK TOK INTEL
New ryzen series comes out in July with max 12 cores.

I'm glad my i3 8100 still holds up well.

Just remember that if you use intel. You like to suck mutilated jewish cock.

I think I'll upgrade to an i5 9600k, anyone have one?

Not video games.

Wow, good to know that 99.9% of games depend on single core performance and barely use other cores.

I can't even tell if you're serious.

bruh, look this CPU...oh no no no no look at the top of the chart!

that test cannot be correct.
the 8700K, 3.7 Ghz is beating the 7700K at 4.2
Did these russians run the test properly or what

>59 with 1060 6gb
yeah fuck me and my ultrawide

OOF

Attached: 1557250331110.png (895x965, 96K)

Oh dear

Attached: 1555420276530.jpg (755x564, 110K)

>all resolutions
nice try intelkek

>GTX 1080 TI and RTX 2080 Ti have the same framerate.
>state of RTX owners

Attached: 1556493712459.jpg (1200x1125, 218K)

Time to upgrade my 1050ti I guess.

Wow, so more power uses more power? Mind mind = blown.

Can anyone give me tldr on kiwami 1 story? I only did half of it

Now post the 1440+ resolutions

by that logic consoles aren't videogames either

Reminder next Ryzen will be on 7nm while Intel could barely drop down under 14nm

my i5-2500k also does

RTX 2080: $800
1080ti: $1500

Which site is posting these benchmarks?

There's literally no way they tested every CPU with every GPU. That site is fake as fuck.

1440p

As opposed to mutilated US cock? ok

Still a great processor, I used to have one but I lost my shit in a flood.

Using the i3 8100 temporarily because it was cheap, probably gonna get an i5 9600k.

>VIDEO GAME becmhmarks
>not VIDEO Game thread now

Attached: d63.jpg (600x909, 31K)

Why would you do that
You just take the strongest cpu/gpu in the respective tests to avoid bottlenecks on that side

Aren't the 3-series just beefed up 2-series? The performance is probably very similar to the 2500K and the a lot more people owned 2500ks instead of the 3-series.

>More power consumption than a AMD bulldozer FX 9590
>Requires industrial cooler even at stable clocks speeds
The absolute state

Nevermind I get your point now, didn't see the selector for cpu

What made you think buying those FX cpus was a good idea? They were well known for having shit single thread performance. Their only saving grace was multithreading but we all know how that works in gaming.

actually what the fuck are they doing with that game that with a top of the line system doesn't give 144fps?

The game's probably hitting a CPU bottleneck

DELETE THIS!

My nhd15 keeps it pretty chilly, nothing industrial about it.

Don't go thinking this is the same as Zero or Kiwami.

The company porting the game isn't the same based one that did 0 and Kiwami for whatever reason.

I do but I'm thinking the new ryzens could be a better idea, don't they keep the socket between generations?

>don't they keep the socket between generations?
They're doing that only between Ryzen 1 through Ryzen 4.

>tfw I fell for the AYYMD poozen meme

3 series is worse due to thermal issues intentionally introduced to stop people from getting the same level of OC performance they got with the soldered IHS of sandy bridge.

>buy RTX 2080
>every game only uses 30-45% of the power
At least I know I'm set.

ah ?

AMD is great for a budget build. But it's just pathetic when shills try and claim that it's anything more than that, even when it's blatantly obvious that AMD isn't trying to break the monopoly. They have their niche, and they're doing what they can to stay there.

AMD has been a blessing. They had the first gigahertz class processors with thunderbird and pushed multi core performance into reality with athlon 64. They are going to again push boundaries while intel wallows in stagnation. There's no practical reason why my 2600k, 8 years later is still really all I need for gaming and productivity. I have switched between several times and my next upgrade will be AMD when PCIE 4.0 and DDR5 hit in 21'. My computer will be 10 years old at that point which is geological time in terms of tech.

The thing that makes me mad about AMD, especially in the GPU deparment, is that their hardware is actually really good. It's the software teams that are probably highly trained monkeys in disguise. The open source OpenGL drivers on Linux are so much better than the proprietary version it's not even funny.

Holy shit my r9 290x is still holding up well. Definitely one of the best purchase I made.

>i7 9700K
>1080 Ti

Attached: 1548341313211.jpg (480x480, 55K)

I'm more surprised about the Furies

Same. I thought Intel was done with the glownigger vulnerability patches but they still btfo poozen.

The 1080Ti only costs that because it's out of print. I got mine back in September for a little bit less than what a 2080 goes for now. Even less when I was able to convince the store I bought my insured 980Ti from that it has died from component failure and got a full compensation for it.

Attached: 1544789821890.png (301x284, 77K)

>vega 64 same framerate as radeon vii
fake news

cpu bottleneck

And intel/nvidia on 14nm/12nm will still have better performance than AMD at 7nm

Wait, I'm a newfag when it comes to PC building does CPU really effect gaming performance this much? I thought it was like 90% on the GPU and 10% everything else

If you have a good GPU then yes otherwise your CPU will be bottlenecked anyways so it doesnt matter