>Castlevania Anniversary Collection
Castlevania (1987, NES)
Castlevania II: Simon’s Quest (1988, NES)
Castlevania: The Adventure (1989, Game Boy)
Castlevania III: Dracula’s Curse (1990, NES)
Kid Dracula (1990, Game Boy)
Castlevania II: Belmont’s Revenge (1991, Game Boy)
Super Castlevania IV (1991, SNES)
Castlevania Bloodlines (1994, Genesis)
>No RoB
>No SoTN
>No GBA games
Castlevania Anniversary Collection
Carson Lewis
Jaxon Murphy
didnt they confirm a second collection somewhere?
Brayden Long
Nope no word.
John Young
No
Doubt they would want to bother since they would have to figure out how to get the DS games to play without stylus controls or a second screen.
Trying to play Sisters mode in PoR using the PS4 touchpad would be a nightmare.
Caleb Reyes
Castlevania Requiem, you idiot.
Connor Brooks
I cant find the store page for that game
Nathaniel Foster
The website (or maybe it was PR?) had something about these being the first volume of collections, but they haven't directly confirmed anything.
Christian Wright
No RoB or SoTN makes sense (gotta please Sony) but not having having Adventure Rebirth or Chronicles/X6800 is really dumb.
Cameron Wright
this is rushed only to steal money from the real game.
Robert Lewis
What fucking monster decided to waste space on Castlevania The Adventure? Even SNES Dracula X would have been better.
Thomas Wright
I want to smooch Miriam!
Caleb Evans
>no RoB or Sotn due to Sony shenanigans
>no Rebirth or X68000
>no Gba games
>no Legends bothers me for some reason
>This shit won't sell and Konami will send Castlevania back to pachinko hell
Evan Campbell
>implying Konami would send Castlevania anywhere else even it it sold decently
for some reason you faggots keep hoping Konami will do literally anything right, you're just asking for punishment
Eli Harris
No. The second collection is for Contra. Which is actually the third because the arcade shooters is the first collection.
Luis Perry
all i want is a collection with:
>Rondo
>Sotn
>Aria of sorrow
>Dawn of sorrow
Ian Martin
Just own 3ds and psp. Or if you prefer home console, then ps3 and wii u
Caleb Carter
>>No SoTN
>>No GBA games
Of course. They're to be part of the second collection.
This is the Classicvania collection. The Metroidvania collection will be its own package.
Imagine if this collection had SotN in it just because people like you wanted it, and then the Metroidvania collection didn't have it.
Jason Baker
You left out the part where this supposed classicvania collection doesn't have Rondo. If it's included in a theoretical metroidvania collection because of association with Symphony, then it's the exact same problem you're describing with metroidvania collections not having Symphony but in reverse.
Cooper Davis
Watch them charge 100 dollars for the superior Metroidvania package
Charles Bennett
>then it's the exact same problem you're describing with metroidvania collections not having Symphony but in reverse.
Yeah. It's Konami after all. Of course they'd fuck it up. I am not denying that.
It's still silly to expect SotN or the GBA games in this collection though.
Hunter Kelly
Well, I agree with that. The only thing this is missing by my standards is RoB but I already bought that other "collection" so I guess I somehow feel a little less ripped off instead of more.
Josiah Sanders
Do the GBA Castlevanias play well on Wii U? Drill Dozer and Fire Emblem are really fucking great in it.
If it's good enough I'd even be willing to throw money at it in my legal Wii U, fuck it.
David Sullivan
No, the press release implied that these collections were just the first batch, and that more would be on the way.
Jack Harris
Got your Castlevania collection RIGHT fucking here.
Bitch.
Carter Evans
because Rondo already released with Requiem
Brandon Jones
>GB Kid Dracula instead of the Famicom version
God forbid them having to translate a few lines of text.
Henry Fisher
I've only played Aria on it, but it was fine. I'm not aware of any compatibility or emulation problems for virtual console in general.
Landon Perez
>no Rondo
Almost got a sale from me. 1, 3 and Rondo on Switch would've been great.
John Clark
RoB and SotN are tied up with Sony because they funded the ports for the Requiem compilation.
Logan Bailey
Not that guy but i want to play all the Metroidvanias that followed SOTN, never played them myself
Ryan Powell
What about classicvanias?
Robert Miller
It's the NES version.
Wyatt Nguyen
Don't gib no fugs desu
Matthew Cook
They're going by chronological release date.
Rondo will be in the next collection, hopefully. I hope they put Adventure Rebirth in there too as well.
Elijah Reed
You don't like platformers or something?
Isaiah Brooks
Rondo of Blood came out before Bloodlines. It's not there because of the Requiem collection.
Josiah Perez
Well fuck. Fuck you Sony for cucking everyone who doesn't own a PS4. What the fucking fuck.
Ayden Walker
rondo of blood and SOTN already have a collection that just came out...
Kayden Lee
I love platformers, but not if they are cheap and handle like shit
Andrew Bell
to be fair that's a pretty solid starter. the 3 NES games, the SNES games and the game boy games is pretty good so I can't fault them but they really should have put SOTN in.
Julian Morales
The controls of the original trilogy aren't near as bad as what people reddit make them out to be. And how exactly are they cheap? If you like platformers I definitely recommend 1 and 3
Robert Ramirez
Who cares? The series only starts getting good at Lords of Shadow anyway.
Ethan Green
Hm, a high price for games I can easily emulate, pass.
yeah they are, they're stuff as all hell even compared to Konami's Contra.
Jayden Martin
nigga fuck off its too early in the morning for this shitty bait
Ethan Perry
They are stiff, but the obstacles are designed around the jump and attack angle, and the result are games that aren't much harder than Mega Man.