The eternal debate

WRPGs and JRPGs have very little in common. You may as well compare Persona to Dark Souls.

Both are literal movie games/VNs with mediocre gameplay.

>most basic element of a game
>comparable
Next we'll be talking the merits of Bioshock and Call of Duty. There's no comparison to be made.

>Witcher 3
>Mediocre gameplay
Have a (You) on the house, lad.

Attached: God Tier Witcher 3 Combat 2.webm (853x480, 2.69M)

Witcher 3 isn't a real rpg because it's 3rd person and thus unimmersive consolized trash.

name a single thing they have in common you absolute faggot

Retard.

>people actually defend this as solid gameplay

Bro most RPGs are 3rd person, except for shitty “immersive sims” like Deus Ex

Retard.

You're proving his point with a webm like that

Attached: 1555518376869.jpg (893x525, 64K)

looks fun to me
combat doesn't need to be deep to be engaging

Attached: trisswine.png (1920x1080, 2.09M)

>shitty “immersive sims” like Deus Ex

Attached: augmentedSoy.jpg (1002x857, 54K)

This.
Gameplay will always be king.
The greatest story ever told is meaningless if the gameplay is subpar. That's how vidya works.
I hate that RPGs get a pass for this garbage.

CDPR fanboys said third person games are all garbage made for faggots and retards.

Witcher 3 should have been first person. Third person combat is trash for console kiddies.

>looks fun to me
you probably think the first 2 drakengards are peak vidya gameplay or something, no one said anything about deep, its about having actually engaging combat especially if your game is long af like the witcher 3

But I fucking hate first person.

Attached: 1538649135074.jpg (2560x1440, 1.03M)

Not that user, but the first Drakengard is a pretty big pleb filter.

RPGs dont need gameplay, story is all that matters

What is there to debate? There are two games in your image. One is shit and the other one is The Witcher 3(game of the decade).

Cyberpunk 2077 will be far superior to witcher 3 due to being first person and thus actually immersive.

Read a book or watch a movie.

Witcher 3 IS shit, because it's third person console baby snoy trash.

Why do RPGcucks unironically believe this?

have no idea what that shit is, but yes i find witcher combat fun. if i was dull i would've likely dropped the game

Attached: geralt (2).jpg (368x469, 56K)

Cyberpunk is a shooter though, first person works with shooters, RPG's don't.

Witcher 3 gameplay sucks but the amazing story and well written and well acted characters more than makes up for it.

Wrong, Cyberpunk 2077 is an RPG, not a shooter. CDPR has said so themselves, so quit calling it a shooter.

But books and movies are gay! Stories are only interesting if I have to mash the A button to select my attack options and grind for the next cutscene.

that's actually right, w3 combat isn't medicore, it's s h i t

So? It's an rpg, combat doesn't need to be good, faggot.

>amazing story

Attached: 1550644153602.png (789x723, 14K)

I will have to wait until The Royal is released to compare. Otherwise I'd have to ignore Hearts of Stone and Blood & Wine as well.

Haven't played 3 yet but Witcher 1 unironically has the best combat imo

it's a game so gameplay is the most important thing

Who is this goth cutie?

fpbp

>it has good gameplay
>no, it's shit
>b-but gameplay doesn't matter at all
cope

So it's better than bethshit and worse than souls? That's mediocre for me. Not terrible, not great

> multiple GOTY winner and top 10 western game
vs
> dating sim for incels

it’s only a “debate” if you’re a redditor

Attached: 24C3EB71-6D53-4A10-881E-8A43988D8B89.png (300x250, 18K)

but you are redditor, let's debate

>both games have shit gameplay and writing except for Hearts of Stone
There's nothing to debate really

Attached: IMG_20190420_120959_835.jpg (800x800, 112K)

What in the literal fuck are you talking about? Go play a real rpg like daggerfall you fuck

>pouring out your coffee
Get out of here kid.

Attached: Sojiro.png (512x512, 90K)

witcher 3

Daggerfall has shitty graphics, lol who the fuck would play that