What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Attached: 1556264319268.png (1187x519, 77K)

She's a woman

It says it right in the picture you posted. Deacon has no real character development, and the game is uncritical of his more dubious actions. Deacon's relationship with Sarah is flat and unconvincing. Many narrative arcs end abruptly or lack interesting or meaningful conclusions. The open-world activities grow repetitive. Poor pacing takes the excitement out of horde fights. Are you happy with the way I chewed this stuff, or do you want me to digest it, too, so you can eat it out of my ass?

Attached: 1512601731394.png (900x900, 312K)

incel

Its one of the most generic game ever made
>zombies in 2019
>open world
>crafting & survival elements
>third person action

Not defending the game but when almost all the positive/negative points revolve around the narrative and characters of the game - I'm skeptical of the reviewer.

Yes, I agree. I don't feel like I can trust the review of any female writer to be unbiased and unemotional. They simply do not have the capacity for passion towards anything, least of all video games. Why would I let one of them convince me to buy a game that tricked her childlike mind into thinking she liked it?

>people will spend 200 dollars for this

Attached: oof.jpg (664x889, 98K)

>it says it right in the picture
No it doesn't, that mostly just talks about the story and has 1 vague line about how the game actually plays, with nothing about how it was developed.

notice how key points are about story shit and how it's a sony game

it's like they don't even have anything to say about gameplay

>it doesn't adhere to my politics therefore game bad

Check out the dev's history to see what went wrong and why there was never any hope for a good game.

Maybe it's not a good game.

Yeah too many white men on the staff, we must change this

Attached: Screen-Shot-2019-03-08-at-6.26.16-PM-720x683.png (720x683, 496K)

Attached: file.png (592x570, 642K)

Why pretty much only the story and characters were considered in this review?

>More than half the points are about the story

So the game doesn't have microtransactions or lootboxes?

>the game is uncritical of his more dubious actions

This can't be real. This person cannot have actually received a paycheck to write this. Right?

...Right?

THE GAME ISN'T SUPPOSED TO ANALYZE AND CRITICIZE ITSELF, YOU STUPID BITCH. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DRAW YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONS AND THINK FOR YOURSELF. THIS IS A RATED M GAME, NOT A PRE-SCHOOL INTERACTIVE LESSON. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BE AN ADULT. FUCKING USE YOUR GODDAMN BRAIN WITHOUT ASKING THE EXPERIENCE TO HOLD YOUR HAND AND GIVE YOU A GOLD STAR. FUCK.

Imagine having so much autism and yet having such a poor grasp of storytelling.

The gameplay's so mediocre and tedious it isn't worth talking about.

Shut up faggot.

>what went wrong?

Literally says what went wrong on the right you goof.

Attached: 1381478976090.png (203x195, 6K)

Are you really this stupid? Go back to your Dick and Jane readers, kiddo.

Somebody give me quick rundown on this.
What did it do to trigger SJWs?

>Deacon has no real character development, and the game is uncritical of his more dubious actions. Deacon's relationship with Sarah is flat and unconvincing.
Great. How does that affect gameplay, again?

what gameplay? this is sony we're talking about

Three big ones:
>White(ish) male protagonist.
>You can do mean things without the game breaking the fourth wall and saying, "That's naughty."
>It's a video game.

maybe you should read the review instead of the bullet points if you want something that isn't vague

shit gameplay

SJW are after shitty games now, how do we stop them?

>woman review

lol I didn't read it and I know it 'll be garbage

To sum that in fewer words:
It tried to be TloU but with much worse story and fallen in the open world meme trap.

>gameplay
You mean the "opne wolrd tps N°135" gameplay?

Not only is the protagonist a wh*toid he's a biker which is a hobby steeped in toxic masculinity

SPBP

God, my shit look better than that action figure.

>gameplay
I'm sorry, could you repeat the question?

>You can do mean things without the game breaking the fourth wall and saying, "That's naughty."
Like what? have white-on-white hetero sex?

lose weight

fpbp

FPBP
/Thread

>expecting good looking american figures.
>expecting good looking figures that come out of a collectors edition box

Pick none

>have white-on-white hetero sex?
that implies ableism, expect a knock from the thought police, shitlord

I'm kinda interested to try it. If people hate it, it only makes me want to try it more.

he was referrin go the fact that Days Gone is made by the people that made Bubsy 3D and some shitty PSP and PS Vita games.

"Hamburgers?"

>reviewers today have to provide "gamercred" below their name with hours and everything
and people expect videogames to be treated seriously

Days Gone is a generic zombie trash game with that "Sony cinematic" feel.

It's fucking boring as hell. Why even bother playing this trash.

The copious amounts of sex keeps me thin. Wish I could say the same to you.

seek sex, you'll realise you don't actually hate women as much as you think you do

Until the divorce.

Because it's a modern Snoy game?

It's a zombie game in 2019.

Because the gameplay is generic like every other zombie shooter

Gameplay is an alt right concept. Controling events on screen is part of the authoritarian mindset.

According to that review, literally nothing except the reviewer.

Attached: 1552755638399.png (324x362, 58K)

>NPC doesn't have a response
No need to tag your own posts, user.