>French landmarks get vandalized
>game with that landmark is free
>spread awareness of it's beauty and history
>based devs donate $500k to help reconstruct it
>other countries landmarks get vandalized
>lol pay for the game asshole the money goes to my pocket
>fuck donating money i'll line my own pocket
Blessed
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
nytimes.com
web.archive.org
justice.gov
statista.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>600 million dollars for a stupid building
lmao those aren't even cathedrals dumbass
This but unironically, if we don't do everything was can to reverse climate change we are effectively destroying all of our landmarks
there's a big difference between rebuilding a cathedral out of bees and one out of stone
You can farm bees
coral reef is dead shit anyways who cares?
trash is easily cleaned
Trees are renewable resource easily done.
Except throwing money at a building reconstruction is actually goong to get the building rebuilt.
Throwing money at environmentalists is only going to line some cunts pockets while no worthwhile solutions are worked on.
Tldr fuck off cunt.
based
This is literally "noooooooo give me that money I want it MORE" level of jealousy holy shit.
Companies are more willing to eat the fees than to obey enviormental laws anyways
Coral isn't going away. Coral survived 4 massive global extinction, including the death of dinosaurs. water temperature isn't gonna kill it.
So how about you spend one afternoon cleaning that trash if it's that fuckin' easy?
B8 or American education really is the worst
You're are the dumbest most misguided /pol/tard I have ever seen.
>t.Jamal
Tell Chinks and India to quit shitting the planet up
It's not my fucking property, I live inland and don't even know what beach that is, point is people that aren't lazy and live there could easily do it.
the picture ask to "rebuild" it but it's not destroyed it's just dirty.
Based jew.
Unironically all prisoners should do slave labor to fix that stuff
Its helps that they're French and kinda care about their country
It's easy I would rather sit at home though
user, I...
Pretty much. all you have to do is look at how the breast cancer awareness month really works and who really benefits to see how these "Enviromentalists" work as well.
- bees are evolving to survive the mites, and pesticide poisoning is going down thanks to chemical legislation chaging.
- Coral isn't going away, it survived far worse crisis than a slow augmentation of the temperature.Australia has its own shit to deal with for the chemical pollution damage though.
- African beaches should be cleaned by Africans, Indian beaches should be cleaned by Indians. Chinese beaches should be cleaded by China. France cleans its own beaches just fine.
- Forest is a political issue 100% the fault of Brasil governments, sending money to this is 100% ensured to end in their drug cartels and child prostitution industry.
So why do these building cost so much to repair? Shouldn't it be cheaper thanks to better technology?
Because cathedrals are real, but climate change isn't
Because that pollution isn't done in western countries at all, and is not any sort of byproduct of western anything. 90% of plastic pollution comes from 10 places on the planet, none being in industrial western area.
No you cant replace the art with technology
Remember when climate change wasn't a partisan issue, and the government listened to facts instead of shekels?
Get fucked idolaters
...
why was this deleted? is it cos he said niggers? surely mods haven't sunk that low
Because you're not repairing it. you're restoring it. it's different.
And besides, you don't want it "repaired" since that's how you get one of these modern architecture bastards who think they're Cezzane, but with a brick.
What's the point of rebuilding it? It still won't be the real thing, just a shit reproduction.
Why do people assume money just disappears when it's spent? It's just getting traded around.
Masonry and cathedral building are rare jobs and well paid because of that.
If you don't know the rules of Yea Forums you shouldn't be posting here.
Because whites have history and would like to preserve it animal
fpbp
Show me a climate change """""study""""" NOT funded by liberals
Pro tip: you can't
who's going to stop me? you?
It's not like it's gone, just the roof and the middle spire.
Way easier than rebuilding the Frauenkirche.
Because the US wasn't in the same boat with the twin towers about 18 years ago wasn't it?
You're a fucking imbecile if you don't understand how this affected the french people, it's not their 9/11, but if one of the 9/11 hijackers took down the statue of liberty itself, you wouldn't have settled for those shitty little lights they built in NY, you would have wanted her to be rebuilt exactly as she was, using the same steel even.
What's Yea Forums?
Nature will never ever come close to the masterful pieces of art that man has created.
The conservatives want to sap and impurify our precious natural resources, BRRRRR
It's not getting traded around, it accumulates in the hands of billionaires.
Jealous?
Not an argument, if we had the opportunity to improve upon the statue of liberty, why wouldn't we?
Also new york isn't part of america so literally who cares
I do remember, but jews like this don’t.
>and the government listened to facts instead of shekels
No, I don't.
not an argument
What is it part from then?
Remember when we elected politicians for government positions instead of reality tv hosts?
Environmentalism is unironically a wholly conservative idea, but then the K-Street Project happened
>the virgin naturalist
>the chad human achiever
Start by donating some of your own money, bitch. I bet you have done and contributed jack shit to the causes you are defending.
>some specks on a fucking rock are more important than anything that isn't also trapped on that rock
Such a grand and intoxicating arrogance.
>GIBSMEDAT.jpg
You would have said that about the trilobites, now look at them.
The worldwide level ecosystem reached its tipping point in December of 2012. It's already too late to stop the cascade effects. Just accept it and enjoy the time we have.
Before the EPA, raw sewage was dumped into waterways with oil and chemical slicks actually catching a river on fire, and even after the EPA, 1975 automobile could be considered as "clean" as far as emissions went. You can see based on the URL someone is wanting to make a modern comparison, forgetting the EPA had MASSIVELY grown since 1970.
They gave away the shittiest game in the series though.
it never was the real thing. the spire who burned down was added on top of the original building in the XIXth century, buildings are almost living beings in that regard, have you ever been in old castles or other historical building were the steps in the staircases are all carved from the thousands shoes who've stepped on it ?
bricks and wood are constantly being eroded by human being,animals and even just the the passage of time. the fact that the buidling itself is still standing nearly a thousand years after its construction is a testimony to how much humans can work to maintain things by fixing and replacing stuff so that the buidling itself may be still standing. I look forward to the rebuilding process, it's going to be interesting to see how the architects and workers will manage to remake what was made hundreds of years ago
Reagan says hi.
Liar, humans don't contribute to climate change
>tfw nixon would have gone down as one of the best presidents if berry (((goldwater))) hadn't knifed him in the back
Ronald Reagan was an actor, it's not something new user, and the fact you forgot tells me all I need to know about why it happened in the first place.
Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it indeed.
Wait, what the fuck is happening with the climate? I thought global warming would never fucking matter until like 4000 years from now?
Notice how you didn't get a response? They aren't programmed to respond to the fact that China and India are the ones fucking things up, so they just scroll past it, as if their eyes literally cannot read what you just typed.
Ronald Reagan wasn't the first president, or even close to that. What the fuck is your point?
you thought wrong bucko, we have exactly 48 hours before all life on earth is over
not an argument
No! Goy! Climate change doesn’t exist!
>And is not any sort of byproduct of western anything.
Most of the plastic pollution comes from China and is mainly due to the fact that they manufacturer a bunch of products for western countries.
Laborers were paid in peanuts back in the day
That some nu-male imbecile is trying to be smart on the internet about how people now are stupid enough to elect someone who they saw on TV, when the reality of the situation is that they were always stupid enough to elect someone who is on TV. That is my point.
That's Yellowstone, climate change will at least lead to massive refugee crisis's in a matter of decades
>coral survived
You dunst. Coral reefs did disappear during the mass extinctions. They've just had time and space to repopulate after the world had stabilized.
>people in this day and age reconstructing a Gothic Cathedral
enjoy your postmodernist church
Based Aztecs accurately predicting the end of the world
Yeah then the media realized they could make more money by making every new president seem like the worst person ever.
China and India are indeed the biggest culprits of this but they are not the only ones.
So it's nothing, europe being a bunch of pussies as usual
Or the best. No in between.
that's because it's a non-argument
sure, China is the place where major industries are but guess who the fuck owns those factories ? and even for whom do they produce stuff ?
those cars and microwave ovens don't appear out of thin air in your local Walmart you fucking idiot, there is an entire process of industrial infrastructures and raw ressources being exploited in the global south to feed consumers in the west.
Also, did you know that the largest oil consuming organization on earth is the fucking US army ?
Global warming is a global problem and blaming china and India is pointless when they could easily retort that
1. china is also the biggest solar pannel manufacturer and leading ammong the most ambitious green energy program on the planet and
2. if the west built it's wealth on industry what moral high ground do we have to prevent them from doing the same especialy considering we're the one buying all the stuff they're producing ?
We have a couple decades before we reach an irreversible level that would lead to the eventual death of the planet.
Climate change will likely lead to a huge immigration crisis along with shortages of food in water in the coming decades if nothing is done.
>SJWs are suddenly environmentalists again when a EVUL WHIT PPL building is being repaired.
Lol sub humans.
Leftist and anti christians have had a pretty bad few months. Sti Lankan mudslime bombing kinda shot their narrative about evil whites in the foot
Fukin' nice. The little guys almost made it too but got screwed hard that last extinction.
Yeah but the point is the only way we’re going to move the needle on these environmental issues is if we not only shut down the US (among other western countries) but also China and India as well.
But the people crying loudest about the issue would never stomach that. The truth is we don’t have a good solution. Until we get one, maybe we shouldn’t nuke the powerhouse economy of the planet
Based AND redpilled.
/thread/
They basically turned politics into sports.
>You can farm bees
>check your beebox
>some edgelord faggot either breaks it or empties buckets of bugkilling/repellant
Epic
'slimes gonna mud. It's inevitable
>environmentalists
>we need to do something now to stop fossil fuels
>also environmentalists
>spends the last 50 years trying to shut down any attempts at nuclear power forcing us to use coal
Fuck these people
Rebuild all of them and build more on top, the money and resources are there it's just being squandered on unimportant shit.
I don't want to explain to some moron how how western countries are mainly responsible for almost all the pollution output by China. They pollute a lot because of all their industry, who owns the industry? Who are they making products for? Surprise, it's western countries.
This argument also doesn't invalidate the fact that the United States is still one of the largest producers of pollution (and has the largest output of CO2 emissions per capita). Just because China and India technically produce more doesn't mean the United States should make no attempt at cleaning itself up.
>death of the planet.
nigga there's bacteria living in places so inhospitable, that even if we wanted to wipe out all life on Earth, we couldn't send robots to kill them doesn't mean we shouldn't conserve the environment for humanitarian/cultural/economic reasons. but Earth's biosphere won't lose sleep over us
Anti nuclear power is Flat earth level of mentally retarded
US citizens, born and raised, actually.
>Until we get one, maybe we shouldn’t nuke the powerhouse economy of the planet
>Dude, who cares if the planets dying, think of the shareholders.
MORE WINDMILLS
MORE
The only buys, it doesn't produce those things.
>solar panels
invented by whom?
based youtube institution removers
slimes come in all shapes.
I know how we can save the planet, user! Let’s just kill all the humans.
You're right. By "Death of the planet" I just meant death of almost all people and animals living on the planet.
Can't tell you're being retarded on purpose
I agree 100% but is right too. If China and India go down, the US go down with them. This comfy Nike shoowear I'm waring would not be.
unirionically based
The US didn't rebuild the twin towers though they built something new.
It's ironic because when nuclear reactors fail catastrophically it creates land uninhabitable for humans, allowing nature to come back.
Sure they get cancer and mutate more often, but that's literally less harmful than humans.
It only took 60 years for two catastrophic failures. Let's keep going for the next 100 years and see how many failures we get.
What's your bee farm level, user?
He was already governor of California beofre they made him president, dumbasses
99
While I'm all for nuclear power, there was a reason behind this. Mainly due to the fact that when nuclear power went wrong, it went really wrong and made whole cities uninhabitable. Also the whole fact that it produces waste that is extremely hazardous to all life and we had no idea how to dispose of it.
But yeah, we should have switched to nuclear.
Western countries offload their trash to third worlders who don't have the resources to contain that shit so it leaks out into the ocean.
>It only took 60 years for two catastrophic failures.
lmao they kill way fewer people than coal plants, they are just flashier and more sensational so plebs shit their pants in fear
China is the biggest manufacturer, look it up and a large part of this production is going straight into their green energy program to build solar power plants
>invented by whom?
does it fucking matter at this point ? the japaneses didn't invent transistor or motor and yet look at how much electronics and cars they make
most of your PC parts are made in China or Tawain, this is a false, pointless, argument over nothing
Why does it have to be one or the other? Places of historical significance are just as important as the environment. I hate every piece of shit who doesn't see this as well.
>I know how we can save the planet, user! Let’s just kill all the humans.
Honestly, probably the most effective solution that nobody is willing to say aloud. The reason nobody with perspective wants to say it is because we then gotta ask 'who gets to live' (after all no point in REALLY killing all the humans, somone's gotta be around to enjoy the nice clean earth after the rest are gone.) Ultimately NO nation is going to cooperate deciding on that shit.
So we're basically stuck in a prisoners dilemma where essentially every nation would need to agree to have negative birthrates and probably even a declining quality of life. HOWEVER even a single one that doesn't go with the plan can easily gain the power to fuck over all the others and completely negate all their sacrifices.
We’re all deeply entrenched with each other. China owns a lot of the US debt. But they don’t pull the rug out from under the US even though they compete with the US why? Because it would hurt them as well
If we crash the economies of say the US, China, and India, it’s isnt going to just be those 3 countries that feel it. And what follows on a global scale is going to make the Great Depression look like prosperity
At least coal plants don't make whole areas of land uninhabitable for decades after.
Okay user, sign up for WWIII, since that's what you'll need to do to reverse it. C'mon, Chink factories aren't gonna bomb themselves.
What's the matter? I thought you wanted to save the rainforests?
>'who gets to live'
based big businessmen, aka the most worthy
no they just turn cities into smog filled hellscapes that take 20 years off the life of everyone who lives near them
>donating to the Catholic church when they are one of the most wealthy entities in the world
fun fact, Chernobyl is now a natural reserve for Przewalski's horses and other eastern animals who don't mind radiations that much because at least humans aren't around
So? the point is that some fuckup believes electing people you see in TV into office is something that just happened in his life instead of something that's happened before. Him being governor of Cali just reinforces that point.
It's not just Reagan either, he's just the most famous. Jesse Ventura, Fred Tompson, Al Franken, Arnold Swatzeneger, fucking Shirley Temple was a fucking ambassador for fucks sake.
I think the french government actually owns the building not the church
>the absolute state of self-hatred in this pic's responses
Despite you hating yourselves and wallowing in how pathetic your lives are, the rest of the global population isn't going to just submit to your garbage.
Libertarian, individualist arguments don't stand up when faced with the concept of immediate action, and the subject of climate change calls of immediate action.
The donations to Notre Dame are incredibly arbitrary; it's stands as this one piece of Gothic architecture that we've culturally decided is important, and deserving of such a massive donation. Meanwhile the entire city Aleppo - a much older and more culturally historic landmark than Notre Dame - is in a state of complete rubble, with hardly anyone expressing concern or rallying for donations.
Notre Dame receiving so much for rebuilding is a completely arbitrary judgment by those who donated, and those who called for donations. It is not a judgment based on where the money NEEDS to be, or where it would best be used.
It would be used best in repairing countless ecosystems and threatened world heritage sites from climate change; if the predictions of an 8 degree increase in temperature by 2050 are correct, then we're all fucked. Subsequent generations will be growing up in an environment considered unlivable by any reasonable standard, and people have a right to be outraged. Climate change effects how societies function, as well. Just look at Muslim fundamentalism; their farms are eaten by current temperatures, rendering no decent harvest, and they rush to the cities and urban areas en masse. The infrastructure can't handle this, they people become disgruntled and agitated, and join radical groups in search of some reparation, some vindication.
It's not about people being outraged that some rich fucks donated to repair a nice building. It's about how many other issues need tending to for us to even continue living comfortably in then next 30 years, and action needs to be taken.
>and we had no idea how to dispose of it.
Plenty of mineshaft space in geologicly stable deserts. Politicians and desert indians just took issue and it was pretty expensive to build, so... Yukka Deep Geological Storage just never went through.
neither do, gen IV nuclear reactors and on top of that they can't meltdown but environmentalists protest them all the same because IT'S NOT SOLAR GUYSE
What's a Leppo?
What does that money even get used for? Making thousand-dollar plastic hats for the Swiss Guard?
People don't make beehives, bees do.
People don't make reefs, coral does.
People don't make beeches, sand does.
People don't make forests, trees do.
I could, but all of it will be shit in the end.
>cathedral catches fire
>everyone loses their shit
>hundreds of churches 'legally' torn down for mosques and shopping malls for the invading hordes
>no one cares
I'm from Mexico and we have the biggest cathedral in the whole American continent
I prefer European cathedrals, this one doesn't look too European to me
Disgusting Spaniards ruining everything, I'd prefer a German or French style cathedral
Cause it's not in my fucking country, it's in Indonesia most likely.
They can clean up their own shit, they're adults.
I don't life in France nor am I French, but if it was an American landmark being destroyed, I would immediately donate to its reconstruction. I don't give a single fucking soft shit about the legions of shitskin niggers, arabs and spics infesting western countries who constantly clamor for more free handouts. I would far rather spend money on maintaining our history and heritage.
And yes before you mention it, that history and heritage is white.
based
the majority of charities are lining the pockets of assholes who pretend to care about whatever
fair enough
you'd think all the closeted misanthropes who act as environmentalists would be all for nuclear because of that, rallying mankind in "the good lands" letting nature take over the radioactive areas
Nah. Slag cube it and bury it somewhere far from tectonic fronts. Africa away from the eastern Rift, some spot in the canadian shield, Probably a bunch of good location on the asiatic plate in siberia. and elsewhere.
>after all no point in REALLY killing all the humans, somone's gotta be around to enjoy the nice clean earth after the rest are gone
But that’s my point, there’s no point in saving the planet if we kill ourselves in the process.
We can’t do nothing but if our choices are “keep riding the slowly sinking ship until someone spots land or figures out how to patch the holes” or “abandon ship and hope we can all swim to the land we can’t even see yet” I’ll take the former
You don't care that if you don't pay attention to what's happening in the rest of the world, your country could be in even more dire straits?
Being insular and only concerned with what's happening in your own country puts it and its culture in jeopardy; everything outside marches on, and encroaches in.
If you cared about your country, you'd care about the world around it. Following your line of logic, it's all gonna burn.
whats the pointing of doing anything for climate change when countries like china and india will still pollute anyway?
>but what about OTHER THING
Okay, but they're making it, not us. Maybe if they weren't such insects they could actually start giving a shit about their own environment.
We manufacture things too, but the waste is actually dealt with properly, by law.
China doesn't even have an incentive to care because it only harms their own citizens.
It's actually beneficial for them to keep polluting cause then retarded leftists in the west can keep getting elected over their pet issue to browbeat the populace with.
So are they going to try to reconstruct it as close as it originally was or are they going to remodel it? Don't respond with a quip please
why doesn't the environment just evolve then to deal with the garbage?
You have to remember that public perception plays into this as well: Aleppo is associated with Muslims, which are associated with 9/11 and all the unpleasant shit that occured afterward. For as much as the Catholic church has tarnished their reputation with their tsundre attidude towards homosexuality and homosexual members, that's nothing compared to the amount of grief the international community has towards the Sunnis. And I'm not even arguing hard numbers either: Even if the Unified Sunni Schools did as much humanitarian work as the Catholic Church, people still probably wouldn't give them as much ear since they lack a proper media branch to inform the public of their good deeds. Does it sound patronizingly self-serving? Of course, but if you let everyone else speak for you with their biases, they're going to err towards speaking about your bads.
TL;DR Catholic Church has a stronger propagand arm than the Sunnis, that's why nobody cares about Aleppo
If the French (and by extension other white nations) actually had some fucking balls they'd kick out the humungous amount of mudslime """"refugess""" (read: invaders) and return their country to the French.
In a similar fashion, the USA needs to kick out the hordes of spics that flood across the southern border.
see
>being a dumb reductive fag
disgusting
unironically based
I think we should destroy the planet faster.
Nature is stronger than humans, so even if we try to destroy the planet it will be easier to get us extinguished.
A few million years later nature will completely regain control with no human survivors.
So the faster we destroy the world the faster we extinguish and therefore the faster we destroy nature the faster we save nature
but that looks really nice. The flamboyent gothic frenchie buildings are abominations; they *should* burn down.
The refugee crisis is caused by war, and caused by climate change. The torrent of immigrants is only going to get worse, and you'll never get everyone on your side to kill them all.
So, why not stop exacerbating some of the underlying issues? Ignoring them or hating them will not make them go away. People who have lost their homes and families have nothing left to lose. They'll keep pushing.
There is no point arguing with people online when it comes to nationalism/race. These people have no incentive to hear or understand your point of view no matter how much sense you make. They didn't come to their conclusions from overwhelming evidence, they found bits of evidence to support their conclusions. Just let them be.
it's too early to make reconstruction plans, as of now the Cathedral is being cleaned up and a big ass blanket is being thrown over what was once the roof to protect the inside of the cathedral, only after experts have assessed what the damages are and how to repair the damaged parts will their be a proprer reconstruction effort and we still don't know what it will look like
It's specifically Parisians, and even more specifically kikes. It goes way back, read 'Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism' which points out how the entire French revolution was financed by foreign, Jewish bankers and the native French were perfectly content living under a religious monarchy.
It's actually cause by mudslimes being fucking murderous barbarians, but don,t let those simple facts stop you from ranting at white peoples.
Stop importing low IQ hyper religious third worlders with out of control birthrates.
Its the Same barely literate in there own language refugees from The middle east, North Africa and central america.
Didn’t some company/laboratory in the UK or somewhere figure out a way to economically scrub carbon emissions out of the air and even generate some energy while doing it? Isn’t that the magic bullet we’ve been searching for?
It is evolving, right now.
We just have to wait for this extinction event to pass over.
Because that would require going to war with the source of the pollution and destroy their infrastucture, which is China, which would likewise reduce the quality of life with the Western world, which nobody wants to do.
Somebody has to pay the price in blood to reverse this issue, but nobody wishes to upset the status quo aside from the relatively powerless refugees.
And solving climate change won't unfuck the ME. That's a done and gone issue that began long before CC was ever a concern, circa 1918.
Europeans deserve the refugees. Why don't they stop destroying shitty third world countries with NATO and the U.S. if they don't want them coming to their countries.
Lay off the vaccines
Then we need to push back. Close the fucking borders, build a physical barrier and man it with men armed with lethal weaponry.
I don't give a fuck if the Cartel is after Juan. It's his fucking problem to deal with. I don't care if Muhammad pissed off his neighbors by not participating in the nightly honor rape, its his fucking problem to deal with.
White nations are NOT obligated to take care of others. We are NOT obligated to take in others and let them hide from their problems in our nations, ESPECIALLY when doing so basically undermines our entire nation because they breed like fucking rats and demographically replace us.
Let me be clear here. As much as I LOVE to refer to people as niggers and mudslimes and spics and so on, I don't have any actual malice towards these people. I simply prioritize my own people and my own nation over them, and do not believe that we should sacrifice our resources or our future in order to save a group of people who leech off us and have the temerity to complain about "white privilege" and claim that we oppress them at the same time that they take advantage of social programs that ONLY whites pay for.
So fuck them. Close the borders, kick out the ones inside, shoot those who try to force their way across. If nothing else it'll reduce the worlds population of third worlders who have subpar intelligence and over-inflated aggression levels.
No they aren't that's silly. You might as well say having a tattoo is as important as having oxygen to breathe.
This is by far the lowest iq comment I have seen in this thread. The fact a grown ass man sat down and wrote this on a video game image board is equally as hilarious.
why bother lol move all the art and shit to a museum and bulldoze the building, fuck the catholic church and everything they stand for. french had the right idea when they desecrated it in 1793.
HOW DARE PEOPLE PAY MONEY TO RESTORE A CULTURAL HERITAGE SITE WHEN THERE ARE BROWN PEOPLE WITHOUT SPENDING MONEY???
This reeks of Mutt
>No opposing evidence
>No coherent counter argument
>Just ad hominem as usual
Every time, lefties, every single fucking time.
>So, why not stop exacerbating some of the underlying issues?
The exacerbating issues of both Muslim and South/Central Americas is that they both have a vastly positive birthrate literally entrenched into their culture. IF you could fix the climate with a finger snap that isn't going to change the fact that both of those groups are going to demand more and more resources and land as both their already large populations and living standards rise.
Fucking China TRIED to force it's own population to stop doubling and they still have a massive number of em and is now facing an unprecedented gender disparity, you think incel rage is bad now, try a nation with a massive gender deficit.
You 'might' be able to argue the Catholics down but the Muslims 'know' that every new muslim is a future soldier to spread their faith and if the climate fails that 'such the will of Allah'.
See
I can only imagine what sort of cringelord you are irl if you're this cringe online.
Behold the person every lefty thinks is every righty even though most of us think you’re an asshole too
>if we build the Great Wall 2: electric boogaloo the third world will magicaly stop knocking on our door demanding that we get the check for all the ressources pillaged and the growing industrial waste caused by our overconsumption
See See
what the fuck am I reading? a page out of a shooter manifesto?
You can't just dump all nuclear waste down just any mineshaft, an earthquake could cause the radioactive material to resurface or leak into the water supply of the surrounding areas.
Silly user, the spics are nice and they actually wanna work and better themselves. It's the mudslimes and niggers we need to get rid of.
>Then we need to push back. Close the fucking borders, build a physical barrier and man it with men armed with lethal weaponry.
He's correct though, the reality of the matter is that allowing the poor teeming masses to enter our nations is how those nations will be destroyed. It's not the 19th century anymore, and we really don't need masses of poor people to work in factories now.
So? He could be the muttiest mutt who ever mutted and Open Borders would still be a terrible idea.
Close the borders and kill anyone who tries to make an illegal crossing.
>its militant retards like this that makes us look like absolute fucking retards
just neck yourself faggot
>I can only imagine
Just like when you try to argument it seems.
First, don't vote for the right and far right
Second, don't get a literal retard as the president of the most powerful country in the world
>based retard
The point is that the news drastically skews these facts that you're referencing. There are a lot of wars caused by warring ideological factions in the middle east, without question, but those conflicts have been steadily increasing as the land that these people occupy becomes smaller and smaller. This is not due to war, but instead a result of the massive droughts sweeping through the regions at an unprecedented rate.
But this can't be confirmed for sure; the reason that people fought in WWII, or protested in Tiananmen Square, is because people refused to accept what they saw happening as a foregone conclusion.
We have to fight this if we want humanity to prosper in the future. We have to care, and we have to advocate and fight back.
If you've seen the democratic candidates for the 2020 US election, one of the major talking points all around is that of rejecting the current infrastructure for the countries energy, and moving towards something less harmful and more sustainable. The only reason they're talking about that is because people are protesting and complaining and not accepting any foregone conclusions. People forget they still have the power to enact change.
If you don't take care of your neighbors, their homes will burn and they will take all of your stuff instead.
I understand where you're coming from, but the things you are advocating for will only make the problems you're complaining about WORSE.
You're not smart.
This is true; an issue of entrenched in culture will not be solved by a solution to climate change. But, radicals aren't guaranteed to irreparably fuck the world in a brief amount of time.
We can take care of some things in a more direct manner, and we should.
They'll stop trying to illegally cross when the penalty for doing so is a hole in the head.
BOY I SURE DO LOVE TALKING ABOUT VIDEO GAMES
>vandalized
Thought it was a construction accident?
>But the waste is actually dealt with properly.
I literally live next to one of the most polluted rivers in America. My state is filled with polluted marshes, swamplands, and toxic fish due to decades of not disposing of waste properly. Just because you don't see the waste because it's dumped in a swamp somewhere here in America doesn't mean we are disposing of stuff cleanly or properly at all.
>the most underage board on Yea Forums (except for Yea Forums) attempts to discuss politics
And sex trafficking results in life in prison, that doesn't stop criminals from doing it. You're not very smart are you.
>sending money to this is 100% ensured to end in their drug cartels
Sending troops and killing anyone that tries stopping them is the only solution to ending the cartels.
Man, you're a fucking moron. When the penalty for crossing( getting shot) is the same as the penalty for staying, they might as well keep trying.
I don't
Baced
fucking yikes dude
>>If you don't take care of your neighbors, their homes will burn and they will take all of your stuff instead.
If by neighbors you mean foreigners trying to illegally immigrate I'm pretty sure his solution of killing them at the border is perfectly workable. If my "neighbors" are going to try and take my stuff simply because I was uncharitable towards them then they are not my neighbors, they are my enemies and I am in favor of killing them before they can rob/kill me.
>be US/EU corporations
>outsource most of your production to china because it's cheap and you give zero fucks about lack of jobs in your countries
>suddenly, more production means more pollution
>blame china for pollution
>ignore the fact that china is a leading country when it comes to sheer amount of ecologically clean production and investments into such production
>???
>PROFIT!
Catholics aren't Christian, Notre Dame catching fire was a blessing from God telling us they aren't real Christians
You put too much confidence in the post Boomer-generation of man. This climate change is going to happen, not because of some tinpot fringe group denying its existance, but because of a bunch of wetbacks that are afraid of offending people in order to literally save their lives.
Political correctness has doomed us all, and if you think the Democrats are going to do anything about it, you've bought into the feel-good propaganda they spout to maximize voter bases - the truth is, they told you that to get your vote, and since your issue is not a major source of voter revenue, they'll dump it to the side the moment it conflicts with a larger voting block.
Hell, the east coast flooding would give them an opportunity to flex their humanitarian muscles for additional good-boi points. People HAVE forgotten they still have the power to enact change, the higher echelons are counting on it and have built a strategy around keeping that in place, consequences be damned.
Nature is overrated garbage. Man's intelligence will allow himself to survive deep underground or into the Stars through the power of technology. What the fuck will bee hives and. Oral reefs going to do to survive a catastrophe like s meteor strike or volcano eruption?
Four more years faggot
>>ignore the fact that china is a leading country when it comes to sheer amount of ecologically clean production and investments into such production
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
I remember when I was 16 and thought I was a real badass for wanting to kill people.
How old are you?
nice bait.
sure, sure the fact that Libya is a warzone, and that even if they get on a boat they're probably getting stranded at sea dying from thirst because the smugglers are sociopath murderers really got people to stop tryiing to get into europe
>He's correct though.
See that’s just it. I don’t disagree with the secure the border plan. The problem is when you start spouting off
>muh white nation
and
>kick out all non whites
You lose everyone and let them write you off as a nutjob racist.
The US is not a white nation. The problem with the foreigners is that they don’t subscribe to the creed and goals of the nation not that they’re brown.
Sex trafficking is really uncommon, and also not really precisely comparable to controlling a border.
Machine guns, landmines and artillery will be more then enough to make repeated attempts fail 99% of the time, the trivially small number of people who somehow make it past this can still be apprehended and executed for their crimes.
You're not even pretending that this is about videogames.
Here, let me help
And then what? Dr goldberd diagnosed you with gender dysphoria and gave you the happy pills?
It's not about being a badass, it's about not being a bleeding heart moron.
>Machine guns, landmines and artillery will be more then enough to make repeated attempts fail 99% of the time
So? the point is it will not make a difference.
Old enough to recognize faulty logic due to lack of life experience.
Yo that shit's gay
hell ya
>build a physical barrier and man it with men armed with lethal weaponry.
Really fucking expensive. If you'd like to know how handy walls have been at keeping out invaders in the past just open a history book and check out the maginot line. If people want to get in here they will.
>White nations are NOT obligated to take care of others
>America
>White
Top kek, we literally imported black people to this country and have a giant statue welcoming them.
>Close the borders, kick out the ones inside
Good luck working out the logistics of how you're going to kick out literally millions of people.
>n.n.nno it will not work even if it works
Nice fanaticism you got there.
How many of them do you think will successfully make the crossing if there are plenty of naval vessels prepared to sink their shitty little rafts and kill everyone on board?
Sex trafficking is actually very common. The U.S is one of the biggest hubs in the world for sex trafficking of women.
nytimes.com
web.archive.org
justice.gov
Again I reiterate, you're not a very smart guy.
>China is the world's leading country in electricity production from renewable energy sources, with over double the generation of the second-ranking country, the United States.
HAHA WOOPS I GUESS BEING CLUELESS HURTS
True, baka
Says the guy who thinks walls work.
Which is wrong, because the overwhelming majority of people failing to illegally cross the border will in fact make a massive difference.
It's pretty true as they are ones suffering from air pollution most.
The political party has the muscles to force the corporations of china to get the air clean or else, because no one wants a nation full of asthma and lung cancer patients overburdening the system.
It's all about economics of course in the end
You're kind of just made fun of people because they're supposedly underaged. Now you're afraid to just say how old you are?
Samefag.
>underage Yea Forumstards who still think killing people is "cool"
Yeah no it isn't. All the studies that say otherwise are typically done by assorted activist groups trying to justify their own funding.
>China is doing it too
>So therefore there's no reason to make changes with minor quality of life effects that will still result in drastic changes
Is Odyssey at least as good as Origins? I liked Origins and am looking for something new to play
ah, a 56% mudslime, even worse
What's everyone's favorite videogame?
How about he Great Wall of China. Did that one work?
It won’t stop everyone but it’ll stop a lot
But you live in a democracy, and the populace won't agree with killing everyone. You'll end up in a civil, while the 'foreigners' 9/11 your ass into a fear-induced coma.
Your solution is just an avenue for more conflict. It won't work.
I didn't say that any of those candidates would actually do what they said. I highly doubt they will (they all strike me as really great liars, personally). My point was people are complaining, and fighting for what they want, and other people take notice. If people try hard enough - talk and email and write letters and protest and strike and even riot if necessary - they can achieve what is needed. The talking points during the CNN Town Hall that aired last night, for example, were a clear response to what so many people are wanting answers to. That was the head-patting, largely disingenuous response from the political elite. If the American people kept trying, they could get a genuine response. And so could the rest of the world.
>>endlessly repeats the same retarded talking point.
There's no real point in continuing this conversation now.
Play one asscreed, played them all
>le Maginot line
oh yeah, because a bunch of armored tanks going swiftly through an area that allied command thought was impossible to pass through quickly is the same as some literal who being able to scale a physical barrier
Telling you my age won't add any years to yours, underage.
Who you callin' baka, aho?
Shade of Giants
oh shit, i'm sorry
>>minor quality of life changes
lol fuck you. FIxing climate change would make the average US citizen significantly worse off for the gain of moronic third world peasants who mostly hate us anyway.
Fuck'em, let them starve, drown and/or cook.
who is this semen demon
Shh go talk about video games outside of this thread while this one keeps all of us shitposters in here
Sorry for what?
Did you even read the articles? They're from the Attorney General who submitted his report to Congress back in 2010. You're no better than the Liberals at trying to push your own agenda while denying actual facts. Again, you're not a very smart guy.
have sex
dilate
join the army (for israel)
>making excuses not to tell your age on anonymous imageboard
?
do you have any idea how much ressources and manpower you will have to mobilize to make sure that there is military vessels all aroud europe ?
to make sure that no mexican is trying to get into Texas ?
you'll have to mobilize so much ressources you would probably lose less money throwing water bottles and loafs of bread at them while buidling refugee camps even if it's just temporary accomodation while waiting to send them back. if you kill somebody all you've gain is a dead body and one less bullet in your gun, there is always a better way than to kill everybody on sight
it's not even a moral argument it's an economical one
You don't understand what I'm saying: unless China stops doing it, it doesn't matter if the US decided to shut off its power grid entirely, the change is coming true.
The only realistic way to enact your plan is through force of arms. If you're willing to fight for beliefs and position, then more power to you as you urge us towards something Douglas Mac Arthur wanted to do in the 50s. Else, you're as useless as the climate deniers you keep berating, and just as unwilling to make the steps needed to save the environment as they are.
The problem is that China and India reproduce way too fast. And so do brown immigrants into white countries. Maybe the idiots that support policies to protect the environment shouldn't have also been all for letting third worlders breed like rabbits.
>because fixing climate change would make the average American life (which is already bad) worse, we shouldn't do it at all
Why do you people accept such a low standard of living? Stand up for yourselves and demand a better life and a better country, you navel-gazing cunts.
Based.
pretty based ngl
Reality that is going to happen...
In 5 to 10 years a virus is going to be released in China, India, and africa
The original intention is to ensure the western world remains the most GDP within these developing nations
Europe has taken in so many immigrants from poor countries in preparation of majority of the people in these countries dying.
Within the next 10 years automation and AI sill advance enough to a rate that labor in third worlds are no longer required.
Countries will block transport from these countries
Majority of the world's population will be wiped out in Asia and Africa
First world country investors will buy out the wiped out land
If you live in 3rd I highly suggest you find a Way out. It's going to happen.
based
>All the studies that say otherwise
>posts no studies
>muh activists
coming from the retard that thinks its viable to just shoot people in the head. You're a fucking retard mate.
lol
Cunts that do this should be banned
>>the populace won't agree with killing everyone
When? Right now? No of course not. If millions of people start marching northward from mexico, central america and further south? That's very different.
>>You'll end up in a civil, while the 'foreigners' 9/11 your ass into a fear-induced coma.
The only people who would seriously object to defending our borders during this time of crisis would be leftist soicucks who are literally afraid of firearms. Any foreigners trying to "9/11" us will die and die painfully.
If nuclear were 10 times as hazardous it would still be worth switching to since Saudi Arabia having geopolitical power is far more hazardous to our world than nuclear waste.
(You)
(You) (You) (You)have sex
dilate
join the army (for israel)
>Did the great wall of China work
Considering that it's primary goal was to stop the Mongols and it didn't do that, I'd assume the answer is no.
>join the army (for israel)
I gotta protect those Jewish lolis
ITT: Chinks defending their dirty country to boost their social credit scores
>encouraging what will essentially be future corpses to come
nah, let them stay their and if they survive then they get more land after everything else is divided up
All you're proving is that you're really defensive when someone suggested you're too young for this website, and your only recourse is deflection. But by all means, keep pretending "tu quoque" is not a logical fallacy.
>calling (you)rself out as an avatarfag
I've read a pretty in depth article about social score and as far as I know, shitposting on an american forum doesn't do shit for your score
I don't think people appreciate how much goes into rebuilding said "cathedrals" with a lot more underlying issues that simply throwing money at won't outright solve. It's going to take reeling in multinational porkies, third worlders, and negligent governments for any cent to be worth a damn.
>If millions of people start marching northward from mexico, central america and further south? That's very different
Why let it get to that point, though? There would certainly be a conflict at that point; bombs, gunfire, children and families dying, anarchy. These would be nearly guaranteed.
Why wait for the conflict to happen on your soil? Why spoil your country and your landmarks, which would be the site of countless death and conflict and tears and fear? You could do something about it before it gets to that point, and it would be better for everyone.
Why risk your life and your fellow countryman's lives? Seems pretty irresponsible desu.
I mean that's not backed up by any fact, but hey, you are allowed to be wrong and fantasize about killing people as much as you want.
it's like a slightly worse version of origins in every way. still very good imo.
statista.com
JUST FUCK MY OCEANS UP CHANG
>>do you have any idea how much ressources and manpower you will have to mobilize to make sure that there is military vessels all aroud europe ?
I'm not entirely sure, but I would imagine it's doable given that the crossing is difficult in the first place, and even places like Italy and Greece have naval vessels that can sink shitty little rafts.
>>to make sure that no mexican is trying to get into Texas?
Not sure about this either, but just guessing it would require about 100,000 soldiers all along the border manning various defensive positions. Bare in mind that automatic weapons, artillery and land mines are very effective means of stopping masses of unarmed or poorly armed people from crossing a given land area.
Because rich people associated wanting a good quality of life with wanting to fuck niggers and now Cletus thinks losing your lively hood after suffering any illness not covered by your insurance is the American dream
I really can't be bothered to refute the nonsense of a moron who takes the New York times seriously still.
>doing it for free
When does your janny acceptance email show up?
>All you're proving is that you're really defensive when someone suggested you're too young for this website, and your only recourse is deflection.
You do realise that you're projecting? Are you afraid that I'm older than you and that I will make fun of you for calling people underages while being barely above adulthood mark? That sounds like the case right now. Or, perhaps, you might be underaged yourself?
Because the sacrifice involved with preventing climate change at this point is too severe. So again, fuck the inhabitants of the global south, they can all die for all I give a shit. Oh and most of the anarchy would be in their lands, my country has a powerful military, is wealthy and has plenty of advanced technology.
You do realize that when people mention the US debt, they're talking about bonds and shit, right? Those are there so that businesses have an ultra stable source of slow revenue of everything else shits the bed. The government is designed to keep printing these bonds to promote stable growth and inflation because if deflation occurs then people are encouraged to sit on their cash and not put it back into the economy. Governments generally don't loan each other money and it's not governments, it's private individuals within those nations buying those bonds and you can't ask for a premature payout on bonds.
Mine's Parappa the Rappa
We do have places to store the nuclear waste, however nobody wants to have it transported through their state. They also don't want to properly build a giant hole themselves like that hollowed out mountain we made.
>- African beaches should be cleaned by Africans, Indian beaches should be cleaned by Indians. Chinese beaches should be cleaded by China. France cleans its own beaches just fine.
>implying trump has actually damaged efforts to combat climate change
he hasn't done shit, clintons pockets were being lined by the petroleum industry just like obama.
no murican politician will ever care, climate change was the last thing that needed to be politicized.
if trumps done anything related to climate change he's just kept repeating the republican "durr it isn't real" or " it's just the sun bro" catchphrases, which just cause people that already think that way to continue thinking that way.
Just because a burglar can smash your windows and climb in you’re house that way, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t lock your front door
>capitalists
>conservative
capitalism is a liberal ideology, my dudes.
You can't increase better quality of life in the US while simultaneously dramatically reducing carbon emissions to the point that climate change would be prevented/reversed.
>loses in an argument
>tries to move the goalposts to something different
?
Edgy af rn
Yeah and now we’re trying to conserve that one
Ask China how their wall went
"Climate Change" people are so fucking ignorant.
Asia and Africa cause 90% of the pollution in the ocean. Yet you left wing white hippies don't want to be racist so do nothing but attack white people and stop us getting plastic bags at the shops and other dumb shit.
American politics is two right wing forces calling each other nazis and communists as they both agree on middle eastern warmongering and extreme immigration to water down their middle class
this nigga gets it
>the sacrifice of fixing a broken political system, losing some fossil fuel jobs (who could be retrained in a different sector), and changing the power grids to solar or wind or nuclear; the sacrifice of all these things is too severe compared to death, bombing, and even all-out war on American soil
Your points aren't reasonable, or even realistic. Nobody wants that in your country, not even you.
what the fuck do plastic bags in the ocean get to do with climate change
Name one thing wrong with what he said that isn't some unhinged neoliberal spiel.
>it's doable
sure if those fleets didn't have better shit to do than indulge in your fortress wanking fantasy
>automatic weapons, artillery and land mines
all of those are very fucking expensive and ressource hungry, ressources you don't always have within your border, so you have to relly on import, and who's going to export this shit to you, the other fortress who are manufacturing their own little murder toys ? the countries in full collapse who's entire population is dying from civil war and/or starvation and/or trying to get pass your impenetrable walls(tm) ?
it's unsustainable, a gigantic waste of ressources, time and manpower when as I said you would get less dead and less economical collapse throwing bread and water at them even if it's to turn them down in processing centers
Hey I saw Mulan, I’m pretty sure everything worked out when she shot that rocket and caused that avalanche
>I didn't read any of the thread, the post
The same thing any action by men does.
nothing.
You boys want to know why we don't switch to shit like nuclear, solar, or wind as a nation? It's not a continual source of income. Once you set up wind and solar there is minor maintenance required, and as for nuclear that produces too much energy, the profit margins aren't big enough and that is why they're killing us.
It would take some big changes, but it is a possibility. That's the point of the topical image posted earlier in this thread; the money is out there to improve infrastructures and standards of living and education and to create jobs and everything else that people want, including having a better energy and waste systems to underscore all of that. The resources are out there, and people are seeing that, and they want that. People want more.
>Europeans run Africa
No! Evil racist colonialism!
>Europeans don't run Africa
Ugh, go back to /pol/.
Unironically we need to be killing jews, bugs, spics and niggers people as fast as possible if we want to maintain the economic growth of the first world and solve the climate catastrophe
Don't be so self hating, that building is fucking beautiful. The brick and stonework, the ironwork, dem murals, unf. It's a goddamn masterpiece.
The same thing could be said about communism
What the fuck is wrong with any of that?
I agree.
So when are you planning to stop driving and using electricity, faggot?
>I'm so smart I should dictate how other people spend their money
liberalism in a nutshell
Solar and wind aren't nearly as practical as nuclear, but since it doesn't perfectly fit the idealistic fairy world that most liberals live in while lining the pockets of jews, it will never go mainstream. Thorium would solve all of our problems.
Weve reached the point of no return every 5 years since the 80s according to you people.
>>it would take some big changes
Yeah no kidding, changes that only pay off in the long-term when most of us and even any kids we may have will be either very old or dead assuming no major advances in biotechnology. In the short-term it would be a tremendous amount of pain with little to no gain for the average person. People do not want that, contrary to whatever your professors or various left-wing politicians may have told you.
No and I honestly can't be bothered to do so, regardless of how many appeals to authority you make.
good taste
>x has an effect on y
>man produces x
>man has no effect on y
based brainlet
Average people in most countries are desperate; they have high student debt, low paying jobs so they have to work longer hours, high medical fees, and so on. This is the average. The system that gave birth to this average is flawed, in that THIS was it's average result. People can't fight for these bigger issues while they're trying to commute to work (in order to keep the dingy apartment they were lucky enough to get), or distracting themselves from how shitty their lives are by using exorbitant amounts of electricity to watch movies and play video games for a sliver of happiness to keep from killing themselves.
That image is about how this system doesn't work, and people are trying to make a change, despite not being able to easily make those small changes themselves.
>nogs and muslims commit more crimes and lower wages
>logical response is to get rid of them
>keep bringing more into the country
based liberal
Brother in real life you probably can't even climb a set of stairs much less orchestrate a mass genocide of billions of people.
>deflection
based
Fun Fact: Sunken ships create new coral reefs
Except it wouldn't just be a few fossil fuel jobs being lost and it wouldn't just be jobs being lost. Stop playing dumb.
>>death, bombing and all out war on US soil
Nah, The war and death will be at the border, Mexico has no real ability to project power abroad compared to the colossus that is the US military.
>ywn play vidyagmaes
see
These issues aren't long term; they're going to start effecting us all very soon. Torrents of floods are ruining people's homes in Quebec, Colorado and California have been experiencing consistent droughts, and Spain and Italy have a roughly 40% unemployment rate among young college graduates.
The effects are now, and the changes will need to happen soon. Or more terrible things will happen, and people will lash out.
The US government is doing it for us, ever hear stories about soldiers in Iraq/Afghanistan who drop air strikes on clean villages just because it's funny? How many rolling stone articles come out about some soldiers who killed civilians in Iraq/Afghanistan for fun? They're literally doing you a service
and how would you know that user
>India and China pollute the most
>force emission reduction on countries that pollut less than 1% of them
>give them free money through Paris Agreement to do nothing
based!
Change can't come about without sacrifice, you can't keep passing the buck. Society is built from the bottom up not the top down, if you aren't willing to make those changes yourself they'll never happen and you've no right to bitch when they don't.
This cathedral survives 800+ years, The Plague, two world wars but couldn't survive 10% muslim population.
Really activates my almonds.
That looks like it would taste terrible because all the colours would leech into the burgerand AIDS
I'm pretty sure Notre Dame is pretty much safe and will get reconstructed due to influences.
>more deflection
based
you aren't wrong though, india is ramping up big time but at least chinese invest in renewable sources
This, but unironically.
Yeah no, you can't actually say that any given severe weather event is actually caused by climate change, that's not how it works. What you can say is that on average going forward severe weather will become more common until it is the new normal in many places.
>>unemployment
Has little to nothing to do with climate change right now.
>>lash out
Who will be doing this? The populace in developed nations will be bought off, "developing" nations will be killed off.
Following your logic, where the US bombs and shoots them all before they get to your soil, what happens after the foreign element is all dead, and the negative effects start to reach within your borders. What happens when you have no more enemies, but the droughts worsen your farming industry collapses, and full cities and states become uninhabitable?
Your solution just delays and worsens further problems. Stop role-playing as a retard - nobody is as dumb as you're pretending.
That's the point; the top-down system doesn't work. People want solutions that are constructed from the bottom-up, because it's at the bottom that all the problems are at their worst, and they'll eventually rise to the top. Why keep postponing the work and sacrifice? If it's inevitable, grab the bull by the horns instead. Be proactive.
China's only been the leader of C02 emission in the last decade or so.
If we really collectively gave a shit we could come to some agreements with China and other countries this is why the US exiting the paris climate agreement was a dumb decision. Sadly the US has actually done a good job in C02 reduction but China and other developing countries are trying to play catch up with the US in terms of power, economy, etc; so reducing their C02 production would hamper their growth.
There's no easy answer short of the US giving massive amounts of money to other countries to "level the playing field"
>save the world by stealing money from white countries
based!
Giving them billions with 0 oversight is retarded though especially since they have 0 qualms with shitting up the planet to play catch up with the West.
>US has lowest emissions
sure... kek
Please post proof that the cathedral was set on fire by muslims, I'll wait.
You have no idea how cheap it is to produce bullets, explosive shells, guns and stuff like that. It's certainly cheaper then endless subsidizing third world peasants.
>>sure if those fleets didn't have better shit to do than indulge in your fortress wanking fantasy
What fantasy? If Europe is to survive and remain populated by actual europeans(that is, white people)sinking the boats and killing the migrants is what they're going to have to do.
>>white countries
lmao
>new york isnt part of america
oh dear god
The Quebec flooding has been attributed to climate change by the climate branch of the province's government already; they had a winter that was one of the coldest on record, and the spring thaw came almost instantaneously, flooding semi-affluent neighborhoods and historic districts, doing a ridiculous amount of damage. The townships have dealt with flooding, but never at this level.
>Has little to nothing to do with climate change right now
I didn't say it did; I was talking about pressing issues that people won't just put up with.
>Who will be doing this? The populace in developed nations will be bought off, "developing" nations will be killed off
Not everyone will be bought off. People are impatient, and vehemently attached to certain standards of living. It will be impossible to satiate everyone's desires in that kind of (both a cultural and literal) climate.
Impressive bait sir, you deserve an extra (you)
>america
>white
top lel
>>Following your logic, where the US bombs and shoots them all before they get to your soil, what happens after the foreign element is all dead, and the negative effects start to reach within your borders. What happens when you have no more enemies, but the droughts worsen your farming industry collapses, and full cities and states become uninhabitable?
This would be where our advanced technology comes into play, you build stuff like greenhouses and other sorts of climate controlled farming, gmo crops and other stuff like that, and protect cities with seawalls where possible. Cities becoming uninhabitable due to heat is alarmist nonsense, btw. We have air-conditioning for a reason.
Honestly fuck nature. It spent the better part of a million years trying to kill us and now that we have the upper hands they want us to use the kiddie gloves.
Won't get hit if you dont start shit
You first. I'm not going to bother changing until you people do.
>We have air-conditioning for a reason
What about outside, retard? Most who aren't basement-dwelling subhumans like you actually like parks and shit
airtight argument, desu. you really told him
>>The Quebec flooding has been attributed to climate change by the climate branch of the province's government already
In that case they are completely full of shit.
>>I didn't say it did; I was talking about pressing issues that people won't just put up with.
Maybe so, but unemployment is a bit different from the climate change thing this thread has turned into. I would suspect that the solution here is economic protectionism and an end to globalization efforts in order to bring average to low skilled jobs back to first world nations.
>>Not everyone will be bought off. People are impatient, and vehemently attached to certain standards of living.
Yes they are, and that is why the sacrifices necessary to prevent and reverse climate change will not happen.
>>It will be impossible to satiate everyone's desires in that kind of (both a cultural and literal) climate.
True, which is why a large part of the developing world will die out.
Fire on this one would generate a shitshow. Also pretty kino aesthetic.
How does this prove the arsonists were muslim or that the notre dam cathedral was arson?
I'm not planning on arguing with a hypocritical internet slacktivist. Their kind can go fuck themselves.
Based
It's surprising how nobody cares about serious issues until it is constantly affecting their daily lives directly
Depends on the kind of heat, dry heat can be managed by staying hydrated. Places that will be prone to wet heat will likely not have much in the way of outdoor activities in the future outside of controlled environments.
Bullshit, here I am arguing with you and my day to day life hasn’t really changed much in the last 10 years
>attempts to debunk the anons post
>says that most of the world will die
a really compelling viewpoint you have there. I'm sure everyone wants follow a path where so many die
How was he hypocritical?
It doesn't really matter how compelling you find something to be. The third world is going experience a massive population die-back and that's all there is to it.
so add tariffs to countries that dont follow a standard of carbon emissions or general pollution
Why be ok with a track where anywhere is so uninhabitable? Americans live in humid climates, too, retard.
He's bitching about other people having not made changes that he hasn't made either. If he had made them he wouldn't still be shitposting on Yea Forums's Yea Forums he'd be out tending to his self sufficiency.
But if it's really due to climate change, it'll reach developed countries eventually, too. Why risk that?
>based speculation
You have no idea what he does with his time, nitwit. He could run entire organizations dedicated to that shit, then comes here to relax and shitpost scumsuckers like you
How long until muslims in france and germany vote to ban wine and beer and those countries culture?
It's not a matter of whether or not I or you are okay with it or not. The problem requires too much sacrifice in too short a time period in order to fix
>Someone's burning down churches in France
I know of someone who burns churches and lives in France...
You'd have to be retarded to actually believe that someone of that caliber would post here.
Actually, no. Developed countries are wealthy and technologically advanced, which means that you can do things to compensate for the negative effects of climate change that undeveloped and/or poor nations cannot.
damn man some argument
my literal first post in the thread
your life may be in greater danger than you ever realized if this is the case
Who are you to say it's too much, either? People born in the last 10 or 20 years will want to live a happy and fulfilling life, hiking and working hard and fucking thick bitches and shit. They look up to the people around them, and we have to act responsibly.
>everyone is as pathetic as me, surely!
Why don't you list some technologies that will save parks from burning and lakes from drying up in the next 20 years, user. I think it's relevant to the thread.
>Governor of a state is the same as president of the United States
I love this nihilistic bullshit that edgy teenagers post every time something happens to a religious institution. As though religion and religious people have never contributed anything to humanity and cleaning a beach is more important than ensuring one of man's greatest achievements is restored.
I bet (You) and the people who made that picture are still using plastic
fucking hypocrite
FUCK
RICHARD
M.
NIXON
Don't act like your unverified hypothetical is fact. Someone who runs those kinds of organizations successfully is necessarily good at managing time well. Yea Forums is a colossal waste of time. It neither maximizes social pleasure which can be better achieved by having real friends or engaging in an actual hobby, nor is it practical and useful. Ergo it is reasonable to assume such people don't browse this site, or if they did they wouldn't be on Yea Forums.
beaches are infinitely more important than some arbitrarily valued building
The beach gives life, Notre Damn is a tourist attraction.
You describe the same people doing the actions that you condemn as productive, reasonable individuals.
Maybe you should do something better with your life than shitposting here, user. You seem like you almost have standards.
So far it's just Reagan, Trump, and that Ukranian fellow. It can't be that bad.
There are millions of beaches, there is only one Notre Dame
Fuck yeah bro, fuck the system lol
>>Who are you to say it's too much, either?
I know precisely the way the people who actually vote are going to react to making everything more expensive due to cutting back on fossil fuel emissions. It's simply not going to happen in time.
>>Why don't you list some technologies that will save parks from burning and lakes from drying up in the next 20 years, user. I think it's relevant to the thread.
Open air parks simply aren't going to be a thing in many places in the future, simple as that. Moreover those lakes will likely dry up too. That said, you can have parks in climate controlled environments in theory at least and you can compensate for the loss of fresh water from lakes by desalinating sea water.
The only people I condemn are hypocrites and slacktivists. Actual activists who practice what they preach don't bother me nearly as much even when I don't necessarily agree with the message, my only issue with them is when harmless preaching transforms into tyrannical law and they betray the grassroots nature of revolution.
>Not backed by facts
Suppose that the US were to follow your demands and cut its carbon emissions by whatever aritrary percentage is needed to prevent climate change. What is stopping China from exploiting the US's now weakened economy by filling in for its indutrial gap through expanding its own assets, and moreover what would be compelling China to cut down her own emissions?
exactly
The truth is, China has comparatively little to lose letting climate change go through, and everything to gain as it ends up flooding its largest rival while simulating its own economy by using works to countract the effects of the rising sea levels on its own territory, which it is doing as we speak and what the Three Gorges Dam was a testbed for. The bugman won't listen to your hearts and minds shitck because it goes against their strategic aims.
It's not trying to play "catch-up", any reductions in emission are a side effect of making its factories more efficient in rationing fossil fuels.
>Spindles draws good thicc shit
>most of his art is Barneyfag
What a squandered talent.
not him but one of my hobbies is actually going to local lakes and picking up all the trash i can around them. I do it about once a week. Most of it is recyclables too
To be 15 again