What kind of monitor does Yea Forums play games on?

some BenQ, or rather ZOWIE, 1080p 144hz TN monitor that was on sale like 5 years ago

its good and I'd never go below 120hz but it has screen burn in from my WoW ui and the windows taskbar, it isn't always visible though.

I somehow got lucky with my Asus MG279Q, got only a slight glow in my bottom right corner.

144hz VA

IPS 165hz. It's better than TN and IPS suits me better for my work. I'd go for the 1080/240 panel but no IPS no buy.
I'd much rather be playing on a CRT though. I wouldn't mind having a decent widescreen 240hz CRT if I could.

va is the best panel
/thread

Any evidence apart from personal anecdote ?

Last I remember shitposting on /g/ the general consensus was that OLED is shit because of quick burn in, this was in reference to TV's however I can only see it being worse on PC due to far more frequent static images (tool bars etc...)

I looked at it before settling with C27HG70 but ultimately was too bothered by the lottery, it seems that it's specifically 144/1440 panels that most frequently suffer from IPS glow.

What's the difference? All I know is that mine is 1080p, 144hz, and has "1ms" response time.

pcmonitors.info/articles/lcd-panel-types-explored/

Simplest way of putting it is "image quality" such as depth of color, viewing angle and color banding, they generally rank
1 - IPS
2 - VA
3 - TN

Format is irrelevant

Important is this

144hz and 1440p

4K is meme that only godly computers can run, very rare and very pointless. Excess of 144hz is difficult to perceive, also meme.

wrong simpleton

>OLED
>for a PC
How does it feel to be a complete idiot?

It's the current sweetspot for monitors for what is arguably next 5 years. 4k/60 is mostly doable with top of the line hardware but still wonky.

There is literally nothing wrong with what I've said according to any resource on panel type out there.

Acer XF270HU is pretty cash (IPS fag reporting in)
microcenter.com/product/478859/xf270hu-27-wqhd-144hz-dvi-hdmi-dp-freesync-gaming-led-monitor

i initially picked up a tn, but it looked like shit. one of my coworkers who's into pc say's i fucked up because TN is 'better for gaming' but i think he's full of shit. he also bashed on about how i should've got gsync and not freesync because i have an nvidya card. i don't even know what that is, but there's some reviews that say gsync works on this monitor anyway.

it looks really nice except by default the white looks warmer than my old HP LV2311 but since it's a hooge screen anyway, the offwhite is easier on my eyes. games look great at 144hz. someone explain to me the whole TN vs IPS thing please.

1440p IPS 60hz

I have a dell u2410, I used it for a long time but then I switched back to a regular asus 1080p 60hz 27 inch as the response time was just much better. the dell is now for the side and i'll read comics or watch videos on it since the colors are a tad better, i'll get a 1440p 144hz eventually when i'm fucking rich because they are all over $500

24" Samsung. CURVED.

(It was on a really good sale, and desu the curve does slightly reduce eye strain)

monitor wars are the same thing as programming socks

>i initially picked up a tn, but it looked like shit. one of my coworkers who's into pc say's i fucked up because TN is 'better for gaming' but i think he's full of shit. he also bashed on about how i should've got gsync and not freesync because i have an nvidya card. i don't even know what that is, but there's some reviews that say gsync works on this monitor anyway.

he probably was right.only very recently nvidia allowed their cards to use freesync, yet they somehow fucked up for me and no matter how hard i tried i have no option to enable it.

Dell S2716DGR, such a great monitor

>someone explain to me the whole TN vs IPS thing please.
Viewing angles and colours tend to look a little better on IPS. IPS has lighter blacks and suffers from backlight glow more commonly. IPS has an average of 2-4ms response time while TN has 1ms commonly (though this matters less in HRR displays).

It's about finding out which thing bothers you the most and settling for the other. For me I can't stand bad viewing angles and colour accuracy is important for me. So I have to live the IPS life.

what's so great about VA? i just got an IPS monitor because the picture looked way better than TN. i have no idea about monitors i just like that this one is 2k 144hz.

>vertical IPS for reading and pretty pictures
>landscape TN 144hz for games
Anything other than this is extremely gay.

I solemnly swear I will never pay more than $300 for a monitor.

cheap compared to IPS and looks way better than TN. it also has the best blacks

IPS is great for cutting videos and photoshop, but boy does it fucking suck with games like Path of Exile. You literally can't read the moving loot text on speed builds.

ips 144hz all those wasted fucking years playing the 360 on 30fps cap im never going back

The only difference I can remember between the two was IPS had better colors and higher response time. Went with TN even if the blacks are shit.

XB271HU
27"
IPS
1440p
165Hz
G-Sync
ULMB
Pivot for pic related

Attached: IMG_0393.jpg (4032x3024, 2.13M)

I have this one, it's 38" and not gsync but never had an issue with tearing. i think it goes up to 120 fps. then I have 2 31 inch that are gsync, then a 25 that goes up to.. I think 155 fps but never even use it. I have a i-9040 and replaced my titan-v (what a waste of monies that was) with a 2080 ti.
Maybe i'm retarded or blind but I don't even notice that the fucking LG only goes to 110 or 120. i didn't even know before I bought it, but I trust "tom's hardware" for most shit and they gave it monitor of the year. if you have the money it's probably worth it.
i got 3 monitors to use for my airplane and euro truck sims but haven't had time to really set the fuckers up yet. Advice on driving sims-- if you're going to do it, make sure you have the money to get the really best one or else just wasting time.

Attached: lg-mon.jpg (940x620, 265K)

when would i ever use free/gsync anyway? i just upgraded my build for the first time in 7 years, is vsync still a thing?
mines 2ms so that's good enough. 2k (or i guess it's called 1440p) is also really fucking nice. TN was just way too god damned bright and washy (watched some porn and it didn't look nice, played hallow knight and it was insanely more grey than it should have been). this ips is easy on the eyes, although i've heard that contrast ratio is about the same between the two.

now how do i identify ips glow? DMC5 looks fantastic with the lights off.

TN has better blacks, less backlight bleed/glow, better response times.

IPS has better colors and viewing angles.

A shame you can't afford a good camera to go with that monitor :(

Gaming is not a valid reason to choose TN in 2019. Plenty of IPS monitors with 1-2ms response times, and that's on top of far better quality and viewing angles.

>now how do i identify ips glow?
Black screen, low backlight and tilt the display or look for brightspots. Some areas will be darker than others. I'd recommend not looking for it though as you'll never unsee it once you do.

ips because it looks better

You could lose your virginity by repurposing the price difference.

>Plenty of IPS monitors with 1-2ms response times,
>tfw you finally get a brain and divide 1000 by 144/165
4ms is fine too, response times are literally a marketing gimmick that gamers fell for. Advertising your "low response time" on your box is as good as slapping "GAMER" into your product name.

CRT Monitor, I'm not retarded enough to buy a IPS, VA, TN monitor, so I'm waiting on MicroLeds

Ghosting, bleeding, backlight issues etc are all problems with it. Having a 1-2ms response time isn't going to help you when you can't visually aquire targets due to the fucking ghosting.

An old 32" samsung tv, shame its only 1368x768

this nigga knows what's up

I just noticed ghosting on my monitor because of scrolling through various boards. Kinda annoying desu.

>ghosting
Non-issue on IPS monitors in 2019. It's a problem in VA monitors.

TN

Don't fall for the IPS meme like I did

Attached: 1553433168753[1].jpg (720x960, 23K)

Out of curiosity, does anyone here have the 49 inch samsung or one of the other companies coming out with 49 inch now? i think it would just be too fucking big, even for a flight sim. I paid.. a lot of shekels for the 38 inch leg, not now for $500 LESS i could get a 55 inch OLED. Also, nippon is shipping the first consumer 4k oled and 8k TVs in june, which hopefully will drive price down of OLED even more.
i think within 2-3 years we'll see decently priced OLED monitors. And yes, they will be worth it since ever other TV relies on a "backlight" in one way or another and so OLED-- since each individual pixel gets a signal-- is the only form that give you "true blacks," which make a real difference, at least as far as watching movies.

Attached: samsung-49.jpg (800x450, 65K)

I would trade my IPS monitor for a VA monitor in a heartbeat at this point. They've come a long way and IPS has shitterrible contrast and color is even with quantum dot VA panels.

Have an OLED TV. It kicks the shit out of literally everything else.

>best blacks
shit. i picked the IPS over TN because the color was deeper. oh well, still looks damn fine.

VA 144Hz 1440p g-sync.
Contrast is great compared to my old TN and IPS monitors, there's some smearing/trailing though.
It's noticeable if you look for it. I have to say I'm enjoying the high contrast ratio. It makes dark scenes in games look so much better and the overall image quality is better.

I do miss perfectly clear 144Hz motion so I might buy a cheaper TN 144Hz display for muh competitive games.

You're stupid enough to spend time staring at a black screen in a dark room?

I have a 32" 4K HDR IPS monitor. I almost didn't buy it due to reviews but I love it. Then again I enjoy monitors for what they are instead of trying to over-analyze them to death. If it looks good then who cares if it could be better.

>i think within 2-3 years we'll see decently priced OLED monitors
You are a moron.

I hate IPS monitors, they have been in the market for over a decade yet they still are extremely flimsy pieces of shit with horrendous backlight bleed which is noticeable the moment the screen goes ever so slightly dark.
In my case I am currently using my good old TN panel monitor I've had for almost 10 years and it never messed up. yet the IPS monitor I bought literally a year ago has been in the trash for a couple of months after I tried to fix some weird stuff where the sides of the monitor were loose and you could see the backlights, and ended up breaking the dumb piece of trash when I did not even press on the sides that hard.
In short, go for TN or with a screen that has a tough and/or thick base, and ignore all the ultra thin flimsy garbage that are IPS panel monitors.

>video games never get dark
try playing something other than bing bing wahoos

VA is pretty good so far. I'm this user.
I measured the contrast ratio at 3650:1. My previous IPS had just under 1000:1.
Dark scenes look great, I can finally fully enjoy horror games. The colors are just as vivid as my old IPS display and the viewing angles are slightly worse, but it's nowhere near as bad as TN.

Trailing is there depending on the colors and transitions, but overdrive set to high helps.

It's not a big deal in singleplayer titles and it's really not that bad in competitive games either, but it's more distracting than anything. It doesn't make me a worse player, it's just there.

nice blog, are you a woman or what?

>Have an OLED TV.
what size and how much was it dude? I think sony has the 55 inch down to $1,100 now. I really want the 65 inch but might just do the 55. people who haven't seen them don't realize just how good the OLEDs are. Every other TV is lit from "behind" by a light. an OLED has the light coming from the pixels themselves. so on a normal Tv, "black" is really just the absence of light, but on an OLED it's actually the colour "black." Hard to explain why it's so different unless you see it.
do you play a console on OLEd and if so what's it like compared to a PC?

Not him but also someone who fell for the "IPS is unequivocally the best" thing.

According to every study done, contrast is the single biggest thing for perceptible image quality and VA panels are 95% as good at color at this point.

IPS glow doesn't just affect pure black images either, if it's bad like that it's visible in dark scenes in general.

OOOF. a 24 inch in 'current year'.

2013 called, we can afford better than a 24 inch BenQ and deserve better too.

You got anything to back this up? No one has said likewise until you.

>You are a moron.
Dumb fuck, the Japs have 8k coming out in June AND OLED 4k. You genuinely think other companies can afford to fall that far behind? Once there are 4k OLED TVs available, why would anyone even want a PC anymore and not just a fucking console? they HAVE TO fucking catch up or they're done.

>le screen size
>big GOOD
It's not 2004, normalfag.

>I hate IPS monitors, they have been in the market for over a decade yet they still are extremely flimsy pieces of shit with horrendous backlight bleed which is noticeable the moment the screen goes ever so slightly dark.
True, if you buy that $300 cheap trash. My EIZO looks fantastic, but it cost me over a thousand bucks for 22".

You are a complete idiot that doesn't understand how OLED works. They're not meant for displaying static images like a desktop.

The stuff you said about TN is mostly not true. Maybe in ultra cheap monitors this might be the case, from 5 years ago.

No one should get a TN in this day and age. Why be a second rate?

This is true, they tend to malfunction a lot. Samsung is shit in general

I paid like $1200 for a 55'' after a fat tax return last year. I use it mostly for movies and console games yeah, although the LG I have is low-key great for PC as well. Can do 144hz 1080p which is super nice for certain games.

I do baby it a little bit because of burn in worries but my wife as nice to it as I am and no burn in. Look at test patterns every few months to check as well.

You seem to think response time is something different than it is. Google it. No one wants to force feed you.

>Ghosting
You need to not get the cheapest fucking thing you can then bitch about it. It is because of it being a cheap shitter, not because of panel type.

Holy fuck you idiots are retarded.
You don't deserve to have a good monitor. If you have this much trouble figuring out how much better IPS is, you deserve the color, contrast, brightness, trails, etc that a VA/TN offer.

In a few years when everything is OLED or LED/IPS, except for the most wal-mart tier monitors, you might ask yourself why.

>You are a moron.
look fucko, sony ps 5 specs already announced, 8k:

theverge.com/2019/4/16/18401209/sony-playstation-5-details-8k-graphics-ray-tracing-ssds-ps4-backward-compatibility

Another article from a Pc magazine fag on how amazing consoles look on 4k OLED. The fucking monitors will HAVE TO change or fucking Pc sales will die. It's that simple. It won't happen overnight, nor did i say it would, but within 3 years. It's fucking already out...

pcworld.idg.com.au/article/660091/spent-night-one-lgs-newest-4k-oled-tvs-did-nothing-play-sekiro-it/

OLEDS are the IPS of the IPS world

it's just a monitor, don't shit your pants kid

IPS. VA and TN are for mongoloids.

>8k
Irrelevant.

> The fucking monitors will HAVE TO change or fucking Pc sales will die
You are a moron. Simple as that. Stop getting into arguments about things you clearly don't understand.

t. brainlet with way to much invested into an IPS monitor

You're stuck in 2012. VA is superior nowadays.

>In a few years when everything is OLED
You are immensely stupid.

It's always funny seeing stupid people trying to pedal the idea that OLED is the future for PC Monitors.

>They're not meant for displaying static images like a desktop.
What the fuck does that even mean? for that matter, normal TVs aren't really meant to have any static images on them sinc ethey can get embedded. So, essentially if you fall asleep with fucking netflix on every night for a few weeks, your OLED is ruined? Not how it works. You put a fucking moving screensaver in the back, like the one I have in the backround of my monitor with earth turning and what time it is in al the major cities. Solved.

And no one should get an IPS for media consumption. The glow that is ingerent for the panel type is so fucking bad like holy shit.

OLEDs are a meme. They are the plasma of IPS.

Attached: Fig_1_DD_10-15-2018.jpg (540x305, 8K)

>$300 cheap trash
>cheap

Are you retarded? VA still has noticeable ghosting issues and response times are generally worse than IPS.

If you play a lot of horror/space games, maybe a TN/VA is worth considering. But for the vast majority of people, IPS will always look better, especially for multi-monitor setups where viewing angles matters.

>If you play a lot of horror/space games, maybe a TN/VA is worth considering
>TN/VA
You have no idea what you're talking about.

Like I said, you're stupid, and don't understand anything about this subject.

You're like that one retard on /g/ who bought an OLED TV for his Windows PC, then 3 weeks later, complained about the burn in at the bottom where the taskbar is.

>VA
Enjoy the ghosting and massive black smearing you brainlet

This is just disingenuous. This literally comes from a test where the only thing that had major burn in issues was the CNN ticker.

rtings.com/tv/learn/real-life-oled-burn-in-test

It is a valid concern for use as a proper PC monitor, but it's disingenuous to post that without context. They're completely fine for games and mixed media.

MicroLED is the future for PC monitors for sure though.

>$300 isn't cheap
Stop working at McDonald's and expecting to be able to afford nice things.

Non-arguments like this don't say much coming from someone as idiotic as yourself.

That's why you buy a proper 8 bit TN panel. Nice colors, no banding, no ghosting, no smearing or glowing. I love it.

>you clearly don't understand.
OK, so you CLEARLY DO understand. You can you explain to me your qualifications? then, pleae, explain to me. You don't fucking know anything. Hoe exatly do you see the market shaping up over the next 3 years? So people with consoles and 4k OLED will be abandoning PCs en masse, and the companies just won't do fuck all about it?
Explain to me how it's going to work. Becaus eeven the fuckign guy who works for "Pc Magazine" admits that the PS 4 console on a 4k OLED looks bettter than any fucking monitor he's seen. so tell me, as you CLEARLY understand the tech and the marketing. How exactly will it work?
you're the type of person who deserves to get punched so fucking hard that it "cracks" when the knucles make contact with your face, but you're probabyl also either a walking plimp or 115 soaking wet with acne and never open your fucking mouth so as to AVOID getting hit.
so fuckign sure of yuorself (ONLINE), but you know fuck all.

I wish I could be as aggressively confident that everyone else is a moron as you are man. Must be a charmed existence to be able to be a complete retard and just not even realize it. Envy you.

>TN for horror games
lmao

Anyway, have fun with your 800:1 contrast ratio backlight bleeding IPS glow trash desu.
>b-but cs go and basedverwatch

>Like I said, you're stupid
Ok, so i'm stupid. So you're the fucking genius. Explain to me and everyone else.

You keep referencing the market like an idiot, without actually understanding the technology.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED#Disadvantages

Static images like a desktop hasten burn-in, this is why OLEDs will never be mainstream computer monitors ever. It's not always about what looks the best you stupid, mentally defective retard.

All LCD are absolute shit.
GIVE US MICROLED DISPLAYS, NOW! REEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: angrypepe.jpg (900x900, 46K)

You're getting dumber with every post you make; I don't even know what your point is. Clearly your brain is too small to engage in any sort of argument.

>It is a valid concern for use as a proper PC monitor
and phone and gaming device and smart watch

>massive ghosting
>massive black smearing
>massive black crush
>most likely curved and therefore massively retarded
Guess the panel

YES AND THEY'VE ALREADY SOLVED IT YOU FUCKIGN MISERABLE ASSHOLE. DID YOU THINK THEY WERE GOING TO JUST THROW IN THE FUCKIGN TOWEL?

"There are also concerns over image retention. This is where static content is displayed for an extended period of time and can be seen as an ‘afterimage’ for a while even when the content displayed should have changed. For frequently changing content (i.e. TV viewing) this isn’t generally of such concern, but for PC usage it certainly is.

Advancements in OLED"

ASUS ALREADY HAS A FUCKING OLED MONITOR OUT AS OF 2018, AS DO EVERAL OTHER COMPANIES, YOU DON'T FUCKING KNOW 1/100TH OF WHAT YOU THINK. I WISH I COULD GET YOU AND BASJ YOUR FACE OVER AND OVER UNTIL THERE WAS NOTHING FUCKING LEFT:

pcmonitors.info/articles/oled-monitors/

displayninja.com/best-oled-monitor/

READ CAREFULLY FUCKFACE:::::

techspot.com/news/77999-desktop-oled-monitors-professionals-gamers-almost-here.html

My point is you're clearly clueless.
You said TN/VA is good for horror games.
>TN
>horror games

READ IT ASSHOLE. NOT KIKEPEDIA, READ A FUCKIG RECNT ARTCLE. DID I WRITE THIS MY FUCKING SELF?

"Something to look forward to: Better displays are on the horizon for gamers and professionals alike. Although OLED will remain expensive for the short term, there is a relatively clear path forward for reducing costs and improving display characteristics.
Smartphones, tablets, and TVs all have OLED display options available with plenty of vibrance and accurate color reproduction. Desktop monitors with OLED panels have been an idea for several years now, but none have been truly successful products. Going into 2019, Japanese Display, Sony, and Panasonic are working together to produce OLED displays for desktop monitors.

Dell was one of the first to introduce an OLED monitor, the Ultrasharp UP3017Q. It launched in 2016, but was then pulled before a limited US-only second release in 2017. Asus was promoting the Proart PQ22UC for professionals at CES 2018, but has still not put it on sale.

At a trade fair in Japan, the JOLED consortium was showing three different panels that meet the specifications of desktop monitors. There is a 21.6-inch Full HD panel, a 21.6-inch 4K panel, and a 27-inch 4K display. Asus is using the 21.6-inch 4K variant in its Proart PQ22UC monitor, which is said to be arriving "soon"."

I can't even tell if I'm being trolled at this point because literally all high-end smartphones and smart watches use OLED panels and you don't hear big time bitching about it.

Store displays do occasionally have it because they leave those shits running 24/.

I've heard nothing but bad things from people who have tried to use them as PC monitors full time though.

>YES AND THEY'VE ALREADY SOLVED IT
No they haven't, idiot. OLED Monitors will always suffer burn in over time, it's an inherent drawback to their design. I don't care what any about any of your meme marketing claims.

Also, take your ritalin or something you mentally ill spastic. It's not my fault you're this dumb.

TN shows deeper blacks than IPS, so yes, relative to IPS, TN is maybe a better option for horror games.

That was probably too much for a tiny brained idiot like yourself to grasp.

You play horror games on your 65" TV you poorfag brainlet. Monitors are for competitive multiplayer games.

Goddamn you have some mental issues. Imagine sperging this badly over OLED burn in. I'll bet you were stupid enough to invest in one for your PC recently.

conversely, it may work because they might get fucking CHEAP. printable OLED displays are becoming a thing. May be able to use one for a few years and just throw that shit away when it's too far gone.

redpill me on HDR. Does it really make a big difference?

look at the millions of pixel 3 oled issues or the galaxy fold, not my fault that you're living under a rock
anything with status/notification bar will burn in and become noticeable when you're using that area to display video

Anothe reason you should be hanged, drawn, and quartered-- my fucking samsung 10-s is OLED and has no constant movement-- if it goes for too long, it either turns on a screen saver or goes into sleep mode, just like the monitors in the fucking early 00s used to do.
so you expect everyone here to fuckibg believe the tech now is WORSE than the early 00s, when every PC company is going to know goddam fucking well that if they don't come up with OLED 4k monitors for PCs and reasonably cheaply, they're gonna lose 804% of their userbase to consoles.
you RALLY think fucking Sony and microsoft console divisions are going to allow that, even if it costs them tens of billions???

you just keep repeating "you're retarded" but cannnot back up ANY of your fucking aeguments. In fact, I bet you're already fucking gone since you know you got your ass handed to you, I put you on a leash and walked you around like my fucking monkey.

This is the most well-rounded monitor of recent memory and it'll take years for it to be dethroned.

Attached: 1_122_561.jpg (700x700, 79K)

>HDR
This is just a lighting technique used in games to simulate accurate light. If you're in a cave and walk out, the sun would be very bright and HDR simulates this

Ah I knew it, a severe case of post-purchase rationalization from a severely mentally ill idiot like yourself. No wonder you're getting so angsty, you're starting to realize how big of a mistake you've made.

>Goddamn you have some mental issues
translation; "i can't defend my position, I'm wrong, I have no sources, this I'll go fo ad hominems in the debate and suggest my opponent "has mental issues."
That's a clear sign you are fucking losing, you are wrong, and what's more YOU FUCKING KNOW IT.

I've literally had nothing but OLED phones since like 2014 and never had this happen, ever. Granted I don't check all the time like I used to at first, but it's a non-issue.

Dead pixels and the shit with the fold don't have anything to do with burn in. Any display with shitty quality control can have dead pixels and the Fold shit is something else entirely.

Thinking about getting this monitor

amazon.com/ASUS-PG279QZ-Ergonomic-G-Sync-Monitor/dp/B07HZSBW7V/ref=sr_1_1?fst=as:off&qid=1555958777&refinements=p_89:ASUS,p_n_feature_keywords_two_browse-bin:6570749011&rnid=6570737011&s=pc&sr=1-1

Thoughts?

Attached: 1550754813310.jpg (251x251, 19K)

Do you think it would be worth it to get an HDR monitor?

For example, these monitors seem to be pretty much the same, but the h version says it supports HDR. Is it worth the very slight extra cost and bigger bezels?

pixiogaming.com/px277
pixiogaming.com/px277h

Single biggest display upgrade out there. Way bigger difference than 4K for me.

>CRT Monitors are the best all around monitors
>1 ms gray to gray
Jesus fuck off with this shit InceLED taste

>That's a clear sign you are fucking losing, you are wrong, and what's more YOU FUCKING KNOW IT.
Posts like this are glaring evidence of mental issues, but you'll never realize it being the sperg you are.

I still find it funny you were actually dumb enough to buy an OLED for your PC. That's impressively stupid, and explains your anger.

I always thought HDR was something a programmer put into a game, not a monitor thing. You'd have to get someone smarter to reply to you

>works fine on my pc
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/01/it-takes-17-hours-for-an-image-to-burn-in-on-the-iphone-x-test-shows/

I thought the same thing desu. I've just never gone looking for a higher end monitor, so I guess that's why I never realized.

a lot of displays lie about HDR support

Attached: rec2020-vs-rec709-001.png (1168x1400, 442K)

>Ah I knew it, a severe case of post-purchase rationalization
Now it's just PURE fucking desperation. If you look in the thread, you can see that I DO NOT OWN ONE and was asking a dude who had one what they are like to own. If you were any part of a fucking man you'd have the balls to at least admit: "Ok, I'm wrong." Makes me think you're a pajeet or chink, since they tend to argue this way.
You've been provided with 4 indpeendent sources demolishing your bullshit argument, you're wrong, so you all you can do-- you can't produce any 3rd party articles in your favour-- so you just go for ad hominem. you lost Chang. Everyone can see it. DEAD FUCING WRONG with NO understanding of Tech OR the fucking financial sector.
you don't need to believe me, left the articles there for you. THIS is why no one wants to hire you pajeets/chinks. No matter how much contrary evidence, will NEVER admit you're wrong. Ever.

You've got to be very careful with HDR on monitors right now because the standard is so new. A lot of monitors will "accept" and HDR signal but don't actually meet the requirements for the content. You want something that has, bare minimum, 600 nits of brightness to properly display the highlights. The TV standard is 1000, but that's exceptionally hard to find on monitors right now.

Exception to that is OLED displays because they don't get bright enough but their ability to go super low still delivers a good HDR experience.

For monitors, I would really wait for this stuff to shake out a little bit more to be honest. If you need a monitor, buying one with HDR functionality to play around with might be cool, but I wouldn't invest heavily at this point.

>glaring evidence of mental issues
LMAO, you've now mentioned "mental issues" 6 times, but have yet to provide a SINGLE SOURCE for your side of the argument. Talk about "projection," Jesus Christ. Onyl a fucking Indian argues this way.

I'll take that advice. I'm also wanting to save up for a new pc, so I'll just get that first.

To add to what he said, the number "dimming zones" is also important, my C27HG70 has 8 which makes HDR content largely pointless as it doesn't make enough of a visual difference.

Fake HDR is a thing, and it fools a lot of dumb gamers.

Real HDR monitors cost like $1400+. Always make sure to check the brightness in the specs; real HDR should be 1000cd/m2. All sub-$1000 monitors including FakeDRs are usually around 250-350cd/m2.

>article is literally talking about how effective the measures taken to prevent burn in are

Also the 17 hours was image retention, which is different than burn in. That shit goes away.

>there are people on Yea Forums who never had a CRT monitor as a kid and so dont realize how much better they were visually than any lcd based screen
You can get all the fancy variable backlighting you want its never going to have the true depths of darkness of there simply being no light at all

Quit chimping out, idiot. Not my fault you were stupid enough to believe OLED will become mainstream on PC monitors.

I'm fuckign done with you. The entire dialogue is here, I'll let people judge who provided actualy evidence and who continually and continually went for ad hominem: "butb--ut, you have mental issues!!!" Indeed. OK, let's accept that as true. so why can you not provide even ONE fucking source to back up your bullshit? Becaue you're a fuckig Indian and this is what you do. Will you deny that you are an Indian or Paki (really same people genetically). i've decided yuo aren't a chink since even they, after time, will see reason if they are given enough evidence.
you won't. done with you. All the interactions ar where, people can decide for themselves who is actually "mentally ill" among us. Hey, too bad I'm not in the UK, you could get me locked up for calling you a "useless, psychotic WOG" which I'm doing right now...

What is good too.

As far I understand it, the only HDR monitor really worth purchasing at this point are those super expensive Asus/Acer 4K 144hz displays. That's mostly because of the dimming zones they have.

CRTs are for Incels and Nazis, end of story.

>It takes 17 hours for an image to burn in on the iPhone X, test shows
>But the OLED panels in phones are made very differently from those in TVs, so it's unclear how much the retention is reversible in phones. It could vary from device to device.
read the article

>Quit chimping out
The fuckign prjection is stunning. and notice, I was correct and you ARE indeed a fucking Indian. Now, ask yourself, how did he know that? Because YOu00 maybe due to yuor inbreeding-- ar the only one on earth who will take a patently incorrect position and defend it to the death if need be for "fear of losing face," yet at the same time shit out in the shreet with no problem. i'm done with you. Consider anti-psychotics.

Some old ass 24" benq GAYMEN monitor with 144hz. Can't see shit on it during dark gameplay scenes and brightness is poor in general.
Will buy a new one when there will be 144hz monitors with proper hdr

You actually need to have sex. This is embarrassing

TN is the cheapest, but it has the worst viewing angle and color.
VA is in the middle.
IPS is the most expensive, but has the best viewing angle and color.

This means you'll find better refresh rates and response times on TN panels for cheaper. The color differences aren't huge unless you are getting into HDR. It is really hard to find a TN HDR panel.

You are best off going for 144 Hz first, even if your budget means you have to get a TN panel. Refresh rate is a much bigger deal than viewing angle and color.

>still chimping out
You're beyond help, idiot. OLED will never be a thing for PC monitors because they're not meant to show static images.

It's a good thing most people here are smart enough to know OLED is never worth it for PCs. They're only for TVs, and AMOLED for smartphones.

X34

You are not a real gamer if you game on LCD

Attached: 240hz vs crt.jpg (938x329, 240K)

The 60hz one made me laugh
HE'S GOING WARP SPEED

just buy this one, why the fuck do you retards post the same goddamn threads with the exact same pictures in less than 24 hours?

amazon.com/gp/product/B0173PEX20/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o07_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

>IPS
YIKES

>best type of panel
>yikes
oof

>next gen console gaming will still be 30-60 fps because Sony and Microsoft keep pushing the 4k 8k meme

why the fuck are consolefags so retarded

>the best type of panel
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHA
ENJOY YOUR MOTION BLUR CLUCK

Attached: download.jpg (294x171, 11K)

resolution isn't the problem, retarded publishers will always push graphic fidelity regardless of hardware to sell copies

Why have monitors progressed towards being shittier when tv's have gotten better. How does something like that even happen

I've got the same monitor. It's pretty nice.

yea that's complete bullshit

I worked in IT for a couple years and the Samsung monitors literally last the longest

are you proposing i get a CRT in this fucking day and age?

>those faggots that spend weeks obsessing over the perfect mouse and keyboard and audio definition and screen settings instead of actually playing games

Attached: flabbergasted.gif (200x200, 2M)

Or you could enable ULMB.

Attached: ULMB.jpg (1468x266, 122K)

Pretty sure my laptop has ips monitor.
Yes it does retard, low quality tn monitors are dogshit while the best can compete with your basic ips.

yea i bet your eye is tracking that ufo across the screen as it goes fast enough to look blurred when the screen is updating 144 times a second

fucking retard

Yes but it can be a pain in the ass with a lot of games

IPS or OLED is the way to go unless you play FPS which... I mean with the current state of FPS games why would you?

the retrorevival is bretty fun

>OLED is the way to go
Idiot.

Best FHD monitor for PS4 Pro
>Inb4 PS4 Pro
It was on special while the normal PS4 was full price.
Apparently screen size above 24 inch isn't worthwhile for 1080p.
I'm still torn between IPS/PLS and VA.
Examples of games I want to play are Bloodborne and Dragons Crown Pro.

Get a fucking TV.

I have an OLED tv, a TN monitor (144hz) and and an IPS monitor as well.

I originally bought the OLED for tv and movies, but once I gamed on it, it was impossible to go back to either of my monitors. The colors and black levels are just so much better on the oled.

I use the my TN panel for general web browsing. My IPS monitor, I don't use it at all now, it's been gathering dust for a couple years now.

My last phone had permanent burn-in from a gacha game.

You objectively deserve it

It was a joke I just wanted the sperg to come back

Please don't call me hurtful names on the internet

I move a lot so I need to be able to fit it in my suitcase.
Even good quality 32 inch tvs aren't 1080p, and I'm not sure the box for them would even fit.

24" 1080p 144hz freesync TN for gaming and secondary 24" 1440p 60hz IPS for editing
No compromises.

>TN for gaming

Attached: smug.png (579x553, 675K)

seeMUH COLOR CONTRAST isn't worth shitty dark areas in games

Imagine being stupid enough to use an LCD for gaming

Attached: IMG_3872.jpg (1280x853, 304K)

The absolute endgame for vidya. Stay mad ips glow niggas and smeary VA ghosts

Attached: XG2401-front-on.jpg (1200x800, 212K)

some cheap ass 21" 1080p60 TN screen for games and a 19" 900p60 philips I got for 40e for everything else

VA because I wanted higher refresh rate.
I'd never be disgusting enough to go down to TN

>VA because I wanted higher refresh rate.
Are you retarded?

asus 245h. its TN but its served me well. can rotate 180 degrees for shmups which is a big plus

lmao cope

IPS all the way baby

>those pixel lines
fucking kek

Laptop: 15" 144Hz 1080p IPS
Desktop: 65" 4K 60Hz OLED or 21" 96Hz FD Trinitron CRT

>gaming laptop
>oled tv for desktop use

Attached: 1516746442351.jpg (645x729, 88K)

based and tubepilled

I mostly use the TV for actual broadcast shit or PS4 and only switch to PC input for games.

Ive had a vg248qe for 4 years. Its still based, paired with an rtx 2060

Don't forget flicker. The people who hate on CRT flicker are the plebs who ran it at 50/60Hz. Fast-moving objects always looks smoother on a CRT because of the lack of ghosting from sample-and-hold.

Is this zoomer larp? I had a ton of shitty crts they were all shit. I would never use one except to maybe play a classic consple but i threw them all away because i dont have fucking room for them

xg2401 and I have a 90hz benq VA on the side for browsing/media

60hz*

zoom zoom

>Still using shitty 1080p 50 inches TV for gaming
idk, i beat Sekiro and play FPS easily, monitor doesn't effect anything

dogshit poorfag
t. not him and had crts

Show me any other display that can display more than one resolution without looking like blurry shit with inconsistent pixel sizes. I'll wait.

that's a big oof my friend

>monitor doesn't effect anything

Attached: 1545077923164.png (804x360, 54K)

if you could afford an ips then why not?

IPS 1440p 165 FPS monitor.

Attached: 1547367902036.jpg (439x363, 127K)

in what scenario do you need to? films on a 1440p monitor is all I can think of

Playing Jap games. For some reason they still think 1280x960 is all you need. Do Nips even have space for a CRT in their cuckshed or are they just unaware that 1080p has been a standard for over a decade?

i'm not a weeb so its not an issue i'd consider