Is it the best game ever made?
Is it the best game ever made?
Liam Harris
Luis Clark
I doubt it. I'd say it's easily a contender for game of the decade, and most certainly game of it's generation, though.
Sebastian Rogers
Best roleplaying game as far as stats progression, yes.
Adam Morris
No. It's worse than Demons, Sekiro, and Bloodborne. You could make an argument it's not even the best Dark Souls game.
It's probably the most influential game made in a long time.
Hunter Foster
No
Julian Hill
yes, for me it is
Aiden Nelson
>Rememestered
Ryan Bennett
Liam Kelly
It could be, if it was finished...
As it stands it's only the best game of the seventh generation and probably on the top 20-10 best of all time
Robert Moore
>Remastered
welp
Blake Hill
This isn't bait. Bait is to imply Dark Souls 1 is anything but above average in the series.
Samuel Brown
it's the same game you utter branlets
Owen Baker
It has downgraded gameplay from Demon's Souls, shit enemies, shit bosses, a bunch of shit levels, it's piss easy, terribly balanced, and has a bunch of broken mechanics (like Poise). The game completely falls apart under any sort of scrutiny.
Jason Bell
git gud
Kayden Rogers
Jacob Allen
imagine what would the game be if the last levels would actually be finished
Parker Cook
>demastered version
Zachary Barnes
the game is easy and im one of the best pvpers that ever touched the game
Brody Phillips
>Remastered
Xavier Morales
Bloodborne was better
Might even say DaS3 was better.
Christopher Cooper
Das3 has better bosses. Actually, ds3 has the best bosses in the series, even better than bb. Bb base game bosses are absolute shit but dlc bosses were good
David Carter
>Can't even roll diagonally.
Bloodborne is, though.
It being Playstation exclusive probably helped keeping it polished and coherent, too.
Asher Wright
This is correct. Dark Souls 1 is in last place before the massive power gap that 2 and 3 sit on the other side of. That being said, it's still a fantastic game, just worse than Demon's, Bloodborne and Sekiro.
Ian Allen
>MASTERPIECE TIER
Dark Souls
Bloodborne
>GOD TIER
Demon's Souls
Sekiro
>GREAT TIER
Dark Souls III
>PRETTY GOOD TIER
Dark Souls II
Jason Baker
no but it's the best souls
Jose Bennett
*Ahem*
William Walker
if ds3 had a better world layout it would be the best in the series
Ethan Evans
I don't get why people suck Bloodborne's dick so much. Is it because of the Lovecraftian horror theme ?
It has the same basic gameplay as Souls with a few tweaks here and there, some of them being actually relevant, like the change to how backstabs work, while others have little to no real impact, like the ability to gain health hitting enemies right after getting hit yourself.
While you could say the core combat is slightly superior to Souls, the lack of variety in how you can/should approach situations hamper it down a bit. I'm not saying the variety in Souls games is that substantial, but neither are the combat changes Bloodborne made.
Aside from that, Bloodborne has by far the worst healing system in the series. It's arguably the most linear one as far as progression and exploration goes next to Dark Souls 3. The second half is pretty weak compared to the first (which granted, is true to most of the games in the series) in terms of overall level design and bosses and the only reason people think otherwise is because of the twist regarding story and atmosphere. It's the weakest in terms of covenants and NPC arcs. Has probably the most convoluted story. Probably the worst online
I mean, I still love the game and believe it's one of the best from this generation, but I feel like people tend to overrate too much compared to other games in the series and compared to Sekiro too.