Is she right?

Is she right?
Are people complaining about Sony censoring games just fanboys?

Attached: 1552943049473.png (608x620, 75K)

No.

>she

>no likes or retweet’s
I bet these are your own tweets faggot.

>if they say the truth I block them
Social media everyone

Fucking do it

Enjoy your ban.

That's a picture I found on Yea Forums.

kys

Sony faggots are the worst.

Big surprise OP is a faggot and retarded.

Hi Ichikyo57.

Its a shame. I like PlayStation and want it to be better, but it never will. Not because they’re necessarily evil or hate their consumer base; but because their consumer base are complete cucks who will defend literally anything they do.

Make some sense you stupid faggot.

Almost always, people who respond others with conflicting viewpoints by blocking them have terrible opinions that they can't defend when under scrutiny (unless they are being completely clusterfucked with inflammatory comments)

Next, people who respond to those with conflicting viewpoints by calling them 'haters' have no good arguments.

Finally, you're either for or against censorship. I don't think that anyone that's against censorship will go against that purely because it's on a different console, and vice versa. Most of the time, it's due to the individual circumstances of the censorship. But of course, having to actually look into each of the censorship cases is way too difficult for their tiny brains to comprehend so they just lump every single case of censorship under "CENSOR BAD" or "CENSOR IS FINE"

>it was hype
Opinion already discarded.

I remember this retard. He seemed fine a while back, then when I saw he was a retarded fanboy I unfollowed him.

>A literal who on Twitter
Are you sure that's not you OP?

>Finally, you're either for or against censorship.
Not really. 90% of people follow the policy of "censor what I don't like, but protect the stuff I do like"

FUCK TWITTER TREADS

Attached: 1555856975740.png (705x1024, 1.3M)

fuck off tranny

>when suddenly Nintendo get to censors a game by removing it on eshop and ask said dev to censor it or GTFO
When did this happen? Genuinely curious.

While there's truth in that statement, that doesn't fall under what she's talking about. She's stating that people only care about censoring when they use it as a way to bash Sony. She's saying there's hypocrisy because people don't care if Nintendo censors something, for instance.

I wouldn't call someone insane for coming to that conclusion, but they are calling it hypocrisy when it isn't. It's individual cases of censorship being more egregious than others.

crying piss baby

>I'm a retard who doesn't use twitter
It's impossible that OP is the faggot he posted because there's no Tweet Activity thing on the screenshot.

>she

>anime avatar
didn't bother reading.

Is it a tranny or actual girl?

There was accidentally uncensored anime tiddie in a mahjong game. There was a ray of light superimposed that missed the nipples.

>Twitter screencap thread

Attached: 1420213404776.jpg (704x330, 26K)

A French tranny.

Huh. Didn't realise they were a tranny. I don't really go on Twitter, and didn't know them until this thread.

pics? For a friend, obviously.

I dont get her defense in all this. Why does she feel games are ok to be censored in the first place?

Reminder that the PS1 beat the N64 and there is nothing you can do to correct your failed console choice as a kid.

He posts picture on twitter. He's also a gay pedophile who post picture of his male cousins all the time. Yikes.

as someone with a vita, it had and still has no games

Holy fuck. My friend is really interested now.

>fanboys
You mean consumers? The life blood of any provider.

Go check his twitter then. He doesn't look like a woman though, like 100% trannies.

>She
Trannies aren't women OP, don't use the wrong pronouns, that could get you in trouble in this day and age

>can't tell the difference between censoring lewd stuff and censoring nipples
I can only see one fanboy here.

Ok then it's not like I use Twitter to begin with.

>announcing a report

That and some golf game had copyrighted content in a background poster.

So Nintendo took it down? Or was it the developers? Looking it up sounds like it might be that the game's rating would've been incorrect, and it would've been CERO Z, Japan's Adult Only rating, and would've caused issues because the limitation of only people 18 or older being able to buy the game wasn't being enforced.
And it's not like CERO Z can't be on the Switch, plenty of western games are, like DOOM. Though I don't know where I'd easily search for sexual CERO Z games on the Switch, so Nintendo could have a limitation set there.

Sorry, this isn’t resetera.