$400 PC

>$400 PC
>768p monitor
>Runs every game at 60 fps
>Meanwhile brainlets think they have to spend $800 for a good experience
Why haven't you taken the resolution pill yet?

Attached: Speccy64_tV7kC5pi28.png (520x429, 22K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=A8VrFUi79yo
amazon.com/Crucial-MX500-500GB-NAND-Internal/dp/B0784SLQM6/?tag=li-org-main-20
amazon.com/Blue-NAND-500GB-SSD-WDS500G2B0B/dp/B073SBX6TY
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>CPU
>70 Deg

yeah one of the cooler's pins broke so its attacked with 3 legs now.

Can't take a pill if you can't afford to chose, poor fag.

>TV
enjoy inout lag

I don't think I needed to spend $800 for a good experience. I'm sure you are getting a good experience, I just paid more for a better one.
1366x768 is for pajeet laptops, though. I hope you aren't a pajeet laptop user user.

>1366x768
>ppi in the 70's probably
>good experience
Poorfags and their rationalizations

low res is less bearable than 40fps drops

>good experience

most people wouldn't consider this good in 2019. Oh well, I guess it's subjective.

for your sake I hope this is elaborate bait

My travel laptop is better than that.

ITT retards who bought 2080ti just to play CSGO and assfaggots. Cheers to OP.

Attached: 1527307956231s.jpg (250x250, 8K)

Ryzen 2200g woulda made more sense for optimal performance with that budget.

Honestly looks fine to me on a 19 inch screen. No pixels are visible.

based
Cope

based

Attached: 1555176943945.png (1326x954, 112K)

Not everyone enjoys playing minecraft 24/7

Attached: 5erdgdfhg456.jpg (3840x2160, 514K)

My current build used to run an i3 6100. Insane price to performance and I really didn't feel the need to upgrade for the longest time.

Attached: Untitled-1.png (403x402, 37K)

>2500$ PC
>1440p monitor
>Runs EVERY game at 80+ fps
>Meanwhile poorfags think they're getting a """good experience""" with a 400$ shitbox

You're gay OP.

Attached: 1526951515096.png (550x460, 41K)

>wastes 2500 dollars for the same experience 400 dollars could get him.
Cringe

>2133 ram
yikes

cope

>2133
>DDR4
yup

I got mine for 350$

Attached: 1555484953903.png (801x528, 40K)

>masterace

i3 6100s were really good with old games when you could oc them to 5ghz.

it has 4 threads m8 and decent single core speed. Most new games need 1 or 2 high speed cores anyway.

>70C
You could fry eggs on that

?

Attached: IGNITE THE FLAMES.jpg (482x352, 77K)

cpus dont thermal throttle till 100 deg and mine stabilizes at 95 when under 100% load. Which it never is.

Attached: pic.png (635x551, 70K)

Mine rarely goes above 30 even under load

Attached: Speccy64_2019-04-23_12-33-47.png (543x531, 31K)

Literal fire hazard

>all those sata drives
>no ssd
YIKES

>wasting money on something that will break down after a few years

>GTX 1050 ti
Why? Are you using a jury-rigged office build with shitty firecracker PSU?

Not the other guy but you can say that for most pc parts though.

You don't think HDDs break down?

Not at the same rate as SSDs

Yeah you're right, they break down more frequently because they have moving parts that fail more reliably.

r8

im poor
Also I originally planned on getting a 6gb 1060, but there was a price hike at the time so I just spent the difference on an SSD instead

Attached: speccy 2-8-19.png (787x473, 36K)

SSDs have lifetimes measured in a few years, HDDs have lifetime of potentially decades

kek, even with intensive read/write a modern ssd is less likely to break than an hdd

>im poor
The point is you should have got an RX 570 which is cheaper and faster.

They have lifetimes measured in read/writes. All storage devices have a lifespan measured in years though, HDDs are rated at best for 100,000 hours, an SSD is actually rated for a few hundred years but the read/write limitation is going to be used up long before then.

>spend money on small SSD
>spend the same money on much more massive HDDs

Guess you never used Radeon?

Attached: rx.png (260x174, 13K)

>cant spend $100 every 2 years to have 10x faster load times.

I use my PC for games, not for storing porn.
1TB SSD is enough to fill my need.

Yeah that's why I've played every modern game at 60fps ultra :)
You are just coping to justify the $1000 you wasted.

delet

Attached: d43.jpg (1024x576, 164K)

>using a 7700k on a b250
Those VRMs are lava now.

oof

Attached: file.png (726x965, 86K)

Last amd card I had was an R9 280x and it was never that hot

I don't care about load times, $100 spend on SSDs is $100 that can be spent somewhere else

pc is running fine, i think the temp sensor just broke

Load times include program launch and windows boot times

>only 60fps
Get a load of this pleb

Why would I care about boot times when I never turn my PC off

But why? You care about unnecessary costs but will spend $500 more a year on electricity than you need to? Seems retarded.

>implying I pay electricity

he's a zoomer, he don't pay the bill silly.

Why does anyone care about how long Windows takes to boot

OH NOES! It takes two minutes instead of thirty seconds! THE HORROR!!1!1!!

Why does anyone care about how well a game performs?

OH NOES! It runs at 20fps instead of 120fps! THE HORROR !!1!1!!

ssd:
>press icon
>loads instantly
spinning rust:
>takes 10 seconds to load fully

>Being retarded
>In 2019
Not a good experience broseph

Wow, 10 seconds, what ever shall I do while waiting? I could DIE!

Why does anyone care about IQ

OH NOES! It's 17 instead of 120! THE HORROR!!1!1!!

Why should I spend hundreds of dollars just so Windows boots 60 seconds faster

1TB SSDs are less than $100 now you dummy.

lolno

m8 you can get a cheap ssd for like 20 burgers. I do agree that having big ssds are kind of a meme but having a 120gb boot drive is pretty nifty.

lolyes

Attached: file.png (1085x893, 342K)

nobrand "ssd" will die on you every 6 months.

I used to say the same thing before getting a 120gb ssd for OS. Now can't go back to rust drives.

>Chink knock-off brands
lolno

I'll just buy a reputable HDD for $40 and not care that Windows takes an extra 90 seconds to boot

>Craptop 768p
>Finally get nice gaymen PC and 1080p 144 ghz 1 ms monitor
>Notice slight difference in resolution
>Biggest difference I notice is how fluid vidya characters move
>Notice no difference between Ultra/Max and High graphics setting unless it's going from Low or Mid
>Run high because it feels like I'd be wasting energy going max for something I don't notice
>Friend gets 4k screen
>See absolutely no difference except small delay which bothers my autistic mind
Are my eyes retarded? The 144ghz and 1 ms seem to be the only nice things my eyes notice.

Attached: 1555046583264.jpg (445x639, 42K)

>Not having an SSD in 2019

I ran my old i7 at constant 80/95° for weeks before I noticed the pump died, it blue screened when it hits 100°C, which is the safety limit.
It still works just fine.

Attached: 498.png (1920x1080, 1.18M)

Based OP. Im with you man. You don't need to shell out major cash to enjoy PC gaming.

Pic related is my latest budget build. It's a little threadbare in places but it plays what I want just fine.

Attached: 1531070487848.png (915x431, 43K)

No. Ultra settings are a meme invented to ripoff PCMR retards.
youtube.com/watch?v=A8VrFUi79yo

Sandisk is a subsidiary of Western Digital, one of the most reputable HDD manufacturers out there. Good job at knowing fucking nothing though and moving goalposts poorly when you're proven to be retarded.

Is this how incels see themselves?

That sandisk drive isn't 1TB, and its on sale

So how much degrees should i aim at again?

Attached: Untitled.jpg (617x397, 52K)

Careful you'll wake up the 2080ti fags

Because theres no difference between 768p and 1080. Except everything looks smaller at 1080

>Having more sense than money
Its a blessing

and a curse

Anything under 70

It is 1TB you mong, and sales still mean it's being sold for less than $100, or do you think sales mean "not for sale faglord lmao XDDDD"

Looks fine for me.

>more sense than money
SSDs are cheap these days.

60$ for 500GB
amazon.com/Crucial-MX500-500GB-NAND-Internal/dp/B0784SLQM6/?tag=li-org-main-20
You don't need more than that if all you put on it are your most used software/games

I'm with you, senpai. I don't think I'll change anything anytime soon. Every time I think about wanting a 2080ti, I catch myself because there's no real need since I don't play games at crazy resolutions (which would kill my ability to play at 144 or even 120) and wouldn't even notice any difference unless it's a walking simulator.

Attached: Capture.png (569x487, 33K)

I spend £700 on my PC, I get 60fps at 1080p at high setting in most games, I agree that you don't need the best in everything to have a good time, but more powerful hardware offers more choice.
For example, I set most multiplayer games I set everything as low as possible to hit 240fps
I never lower resolution below 1920x1080 though

amazon.com/Blue-NAND-500GB-SSD-WDS500G2B0B/dp/B073SBX6TY
A little cheaper, and NVMe which is superior.

10sec* the number of time you open it.
It adds up pretty fast over time.

m.2 not nvwe, I'm retarded.

> getting bottlenecked by having 3.2 on the CPU

Absolute brainlet

A small SSD just for the OS is very cheap these days, and the performance improvement is 100% worth it

>that cpu clock speed
You're a fucking moron.

You know Speccy doesn't show overclocks right?

Yeah speccy a shit. I wonder when people will just stop using it. Basically every alternative is better than this abandonware at this point.

Even if you over clocked it to 4.2 you are still getting bottlenecked with a 1080ti brainlet.

Found the gaylords that don't know how speccy works. Did you even notice that the cpu model isn't shown? That means it's an 8th gen or higher cpu.

Attached: coughs.png (433x238, 14K)

Buy a proper 500GB SSD with good read/write speeds and make a clean install on your PC, it will feel like a whole new machine.

btw
I replaced said garbage Corsair H60 with a 20$ coolermaster fan and it works just as well.
got the ram for free don't @ me

Attached: ss+(2019-04-23+at+02.35.23).png (583x355, 20K)

You're one of those morons who thinks clock speeds are everything, aren't you? A pentium 4 that is 15 years old had a base clock speed of 3.6ghz. Clock speed means fuck all when compared to other architectures.

I do feel kind dumb still I should have looked up a video like this before purchasing my build, just lucky I didn't meme myself
My buddy got a ibuypower 2080ti pc with a 1080p 60hz monitor. Kind of confusing due to the card he got and playing just Pillars of Eternity
That's a lotta storage. You render videos or have a huge backlog?

Glad you didn't fall for the AIO meme a second time. They're almost always inferior to same-priced air coolers.

I recently paired my i5-2500k with a 1060 and it bothers me that I can't play UT at max settings in 1080p

I download shit. Tons of it. I would download much more if I wasn't limited with a data cap of 1TB a month.

Attached: saved.png (778x643, 94K)

Not him but I also fell for the corsair AIO too. Should I replace it if I haven't had any problems yet? Running an i7 4790k with 30C idle and 60-70C under load. Only thing that I had to do is replace the shitty loud 140mm stock fans with some shitty colored but efficient Noctuas. Also if they could make a case that could match the browns of noctua I wouldn't mind it as much.

Based seeder

I'm If it still works there's no reason to replace it, for my H60 the pump was getting weak and i noticed a small crack in the tubes near the CPU block and some air bubble probably slipped in, that was after 4 years of intensive use with very long uptimes.

Attached: 500333.jpg (2891x4093, 2.56M)

>The Game (USA)
You did that on purpose didn't you

Aren't games insanely huge these days? Hitman 2 demands 120 GB to install.

Depens on how long you already have it, I guess. You probably asking the wrong person though because I don't trust AIOs. There really isn't any reason to go AIO when the Dark Rock Pro 4 and Noctua NH-D15 exist. Custom loop or bust.

>have $800 PC
>have 1440x3440p 100-120hz monitor
>play 4x games and shooters with friends with optimal comfiness on my recliner
Your loss, friend

Attached: d3a.png (600x383, 418K)

It's all about what you want to achieve. $800 is still amazing value if you buy smart though.

>Got refubished office PC w/ i5 2500 + 8GB RAM + 1TB HDD for 99€ (came with 900p monitor + basic KB & M set)
>slapped in a 25€ GTX 750ti
>still runs anything I throw at it
>could upgrade to i7 3770K or a Xeon, and do even better
Less than 150 bucks for a modest but capable gaming PC, and there's still folks who don't own one??

1050ti is merely ~15-20% slower than GTX 1060. It's amazing card for its price, and great way to turn any wormbox into make-shift gaming computer thanks to its low power requirements.

t. got two PCs in my household, one with 6gb 1060, one with 1050ti.

>Why does anyone care about how long Windows takes to boot
This.
It takes like 30 secs for my W7 Ultimate to boot, with all the crap its collected throughout the years, and I'm still on a 7200rpm HDD.
I do seldom shut it down completely though; the thing wakes up from the Sleep mode in a second or two, and Hibernation is a tad faster than full restart while letting me start right from where I left the thing.

They are. 100GB pain-tresshold got already crossed couple years ago.
One reason I do not understand or support these "lol just get a cheap SSD bro!" -morons; got several TBs worth of shit already clucking my PC.

That's why I have a normal 1TB HDD for games and a $25 SSD to put my OS on. It's just the OS so if it fails I can replace it. The thing used to take a minute+ to boot but is now up and running in less than 20 seconds.

Attached: Capture.png (939x835, 40K)