What monitor do you use, Yea Forums?

What monitor do you use, Yea Forums?

Attached: ips vs tn.jpg (2560x1440, 288K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lenovo.com/ch/en/accessories-and-monitors/monitors/office/X1-27-inch-Monitor-HDMI/p/60E2GAT1CH
lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34UC79G-B-ultrawide-monitor
lg.com/us/monitors/lg-32UD99-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor
pcpartpicker.com/product/LXMwrH/acer-xfa240-bmjdpr-240-1920x1080-144hz-monitor-xfa240-bmjdpr
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_Data_Channel
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

TN... less backlight bleeding

IPS because it's literally better in every way.
sucks to be a poorfag huh?

i use a tv like a normal human being.

>TN
Unless your poor this is a retarded option. The only thing TN does better then IPS is the colour black.
TN is used in calculator screens for a reason, it's cheap.

IPS. Backlight bleed isn't noticable to me since I don't have the brightness very high. TN is just pure trash. Use either VA or IPS right now

I use 2 32 inch tvs. One a friend gave to me when he was getting a bigger tv and the other I got on sale.

>colour

Currently rocking dual monitors.

This for productivity:
lenovo.com/ch/en/accessories-and-monitors/monitors/office/X1-27-inch-Monitor-HDMI/p/60E2GAT1CH

This for gaming:
lg.com/us/monitors/lg-34UC79G-B-ultrawide-monitor

>using English the wrong way
Ok Amerifat

Attached: Trudeau-Singapore-Selfie-640x380.png (640x380, 412K)

Isn't VA behind IPS in terms of response times?

IPS main monitor, 2 TN monitors on the side

TN has way faster response time

TN panels have the least amount of latency so they do that better too.

My IPS monitor has a 1 millisecond response time, it's easier to get a TN monitor with a good response time but it's not like that's hard nowadays.

>when you're one of those gaming autists who can detect even the slightest difference in monitor response time
>but also an artist with a good enough eye to need a great picture and perfect colors

I'm just not going to win... am I? I chose the NT, for now.

Attached: 407d6d8c265.png (318x350, 150K)

t. brainlet poorfags.
Good IPS Monitors in 2019 do not have latency issues. See the LG monitor in this guy's post:

>IPS sucks I can totally tell the difference between 1ms and 4ms

Attached: silver-1.jpg (480x220, 12K)

CRT

what are ISP defending /g/ niggers doing here?
TN is superior for gaming, unless you are spending 500-1000 on ISP.

Is "response time" even something to take account? This goes for the CRT-fags too, who the hell notice a few miliseconds of difference?

I moved from an Asus VG248QE to that LG. Great monitor if you have the money

autists

KEK you can get an IPS display for $100 nowadays, so stop pretending you are rich

CRT

Attached: crt.jpg (4160x3120, 1.73M)

It's very easy to spot it with trained eyes. It's not just input lag, but horrid smearing with fast motion.

It may give you a slight edge at the highest level (professional) of competitive play. It doesn't make a difference to the average Yea Forums poster that is bad at games.

IPS because I like best image quality and im not an underage gaymer faggot

Attached: 1551851907234.jpg (233x255, 11K)

>muh colours
IPs tards are pathetic

TN has better response time and is cheaper. Monitors these days and also your GPU software has a shit load of colour /contrast options so you can make it look exactly the way you want

IPS, the price difference isn't much of a factor anymore.

unless it's in the 1000s of milliseconds it's unnoticeable and anyone that says otherwise is a fucking retard.

literal mongoloid tier post

>21:9

Lol

21:9 IPS

Fucking retard

Way to completely miss the context of my post you stupid idiot.

best IPS
lg.com/us/monitors/lg-32UD99-W-4k-uhd-led-monitor

Oh hey, I use that same LG
Good taste

Anyone tried VA's? I am really allured by the supposedly high contrasts.

Whoops, my bad. This should be it VG279Q.

>VA
Enjoy your ghosting, cuck.

Not many Ultrawides are flat panels, at least not many good ones.

Curved is fine anyway, I barely even notice it's curved.

>durr you're a poorfag because they don't use IPS
>Actually IPS is dirt cheap nowadays
>HURR DURR WAY TO MISS THE CONTEXT DUURR
kek

All backlit displays are susceptible to backlight bleed, especially ones that are edge lit. The panel type is completely unrelated

>this amount of cope for wasting your money on meme panels

do you own it?
im considering buying it?

Non curved ultra wide is great

Response time is not input latency. It's the time it takes for a pixel to change fully from one color to another, usually two very similar shades of gray (GTG, or gray-to-gray). It affects motion blur, not input latency, and these days IPS and TN are very comparable in that regard

Yes, you are absolutely missing the context of my post, and now you're just doubling down on your stupidity.

I use an IPS. I don't see the complaints, it has a really good refresh rate, no bad motion blur that I've heard about, and really clear images and colors.

>fucking ips and tn monitors
how the fuck is this ancient technology still relevant? don't they make fucking amoled or qled screens or whatever these days?

qled is a fucking samsung trademark for ips.
and there's very few oled monitors on the market because image retention hasn't been solved yet

Maybe try researching before you make a post pretending you know what you're on about. It's impossible for a TN panel to produce the same color accuracy as an IPS due to the technology itself and no amount of options on the monitor/GPU will change that.

I will be buying this next week. pcpartpicker.com/product/LXMwrH/acer-xfa240-bmjdpr-240-1920x1080-144hz-monitor-xfa240-bmjdpr

1ms 144hz 1440p TN mastuh rayce

Gsync also

>no amount of options on the monitor/GPU will change that
That's where you're wrong kiddo

I use an HP zr30w monitor. This is a 30" wide-gamut IPS display.
>2560x1600
>60hz, can be overclocked to 72hz
>100% Adobe RGB coverage
>400 nit brightness
>7ms response time gray to gray
>12ms response time black to white
>10ms of input delay
>displayport only

This is a huge monitor. By virtue of being a 16:10 monitor it has a lot more screen area than a more typical 27" 16:9 monitor. 404.5 square inches compared to 311.5. This extra size makes it more pleasant to use for gaming.

100% Adobe coverage means this is a wide gamut monitor, and colors will look oversaturated unless a color profile is used. In games this is acomplished by the use of reshade, and the LUT shader. a 3d Lut can be created with displaycal based on the manufacturer provided .icc file. When this is done games will have correct colors.

Image quality is extremely good on static, brightly lit scenes. In fast movement the 10ms response time creates some unfortunate blur. I hardly notice when playing modern 3d games like Sekiro, but in old games like Super Mario World hacks the blurring is immediately noticeable when the screen scrolls.
In dark scenes the use of a bias light and lowering the backlight to 1/4 power mostly overcomes IPS drawbacks. Extremely dimly lit scenes show backlight bleeds.

This monitor produces a shitload of heat and at the highest backlight setting will heat up your room to an uncomfortable level. Expect to run it at half or quarter power most of the time.
Most games either allow 16:10 out of the box, or can be modded to allow it.

Monitor has no OSD. All corrections other than backlight power are done in-software with your PC.

I paid $108 on ebay for mine.

Attached: ZR30w_Stock[1].jpg (600x368, 53K)

You sound like Patrick Bateman

>amoled/oled
Based retard. If you think those are in any way suited to being computer monitors, you don't know shit.

>gsync
>unironically paying the nvidia bonus when you can now use freesync on nvidia cards
Based
Fucking
Retard

That post will now be archived and smart anons researching monitor choices will plug zr30w into the fireden archive and find it.

>can get a 55" 4k oled TV for as little as $1,000
>a 21.5" oled monitor is $5,000
Why? And TVs are only getting better. Newer models will support 4k at 120 hz + adaptive sync through hdmi.

Attached: 1554405228658.png (640x524, 748K)

I’ve had the monitor since 2017 you pretentious cunt.

Manufacturing process difficulties due top smaller, higher density panel needed, and jewery.

Ips

Crappy 24 in TN...

Attached: 049C63FB-5C66-414E-A525-9799CBFAF5EE.jpg (3802x2826, 1.9M)

p2715q, u2312hmt, and a ibm p275.

I'm planning on buying a AOC G2590FX. It's a bit hard for me to justify paying for an IPS right now when all I do on my PC is play vidya every other day. I'm planning on buying a 144hz IPS in a couple of years and then leaving the AOC for my younger brother. Unless having a TN+IPS dual set up is bearable enough for me but I don't think it will be

Attached: 1554981023029.png (424x655, 237K)

But phones have pixel densities exceeding 500 ppi with oled displays

Based SE poster.

Attached: 1531199273880.jpg (2120x1192, 450K)

I would consider buying one of these if I could find one for around that price but the cheapest Ebay listings seem to all have scratches and charge a minimum $60 shipping.

Wait until the right thing comes up on ebay.

I use the one in that picture but the IPS acer predator 1440p 144 hz gsync. Love it. Also use a regular old 1080p 60 hz tv for couch gaming.

>Monitor has no OSD. All corrections other than backlight power are done in-software with your PC.

Fucking horrible, I bet they only support Windows too.

IPS glow is a very real thing.

>I bet they only support Windows too.
I really hated that shit with winDAS for CRT trinitron monitors back in the day. Such a headache getting that crap to work.

It's cute seeing you try this hard to rationalize your shitty TN monitor.

ips

Attached: 6B40E97F-4296-4D80-8AA3-9365123E2F0B.jpg (4032x3024, 3.42M)

Fucking retard

>tfw no OLED monitors yet.

Attached: BA02A2A6-0DE2-42ED-B151-46BCCB29C271.png (595x674, 272K)

27 inch IPS 1440p/165hz. My dream monitor would be a 4K ultrawide that's about 100hz, should be possible in a few years.

why

>buying IPS

have fun with washed out colors

1440p 75hz ips. I tried a 144hz screen at my friend to see if it was worth upgrading to one but all I could notice were the abyssmal colors since it was a TN panel.

Attached: 43.png (540x542, 449K)

>bashes people
>refuses to explain why

Yep we are on Yea Forums

I had a 21:9 LG freesync 144hrz, but I recently moved and it got cracked during the move. So I plan on fixing it later on, but in the meantime I ended up getting another freesync ultrawide that is VA instead of IPS.
why does it seem like the VA panel (3440x1440) has a flickering issue. Is this common for VA panels?

Nice~

Attached: space2.jpg (1920x1080, 620K)

There is no such thing as an IPS monitor with a 1ms response time. IPS response time is generally low enough to be negligible but I still notice ghosting every once and a while. Definitely worth the tradeoff for better colors and angles though.

Dell P2414H, which is a decent IPS 1920x1080/60hz monitor.
I want to get one of those newer 144hz VA panels. Does anyone have any experience with those?

Is gsync worth the extra cost?

No, you can use DDC, which is cross-platform.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_Data_Channel

freesync definitely is
gsync might be more expensive though

I hate poor viewing angles, for me it's ips with matte finish

I have an Nvidia card am I stuck with only gsync.

Cope.