Guess that pokemon, Yea Forums

Attached: VKAdzJ4.png (1127x462, 44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

au.ign.com/articles/2009/10/13/pokemon-mystery-dungeon-explorers-of-sky-review
twitter.com/jackdrat/media?lang=en
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I give up.

Why do video game reviewers hate Mystery Dungeon so much?

XD

I know it's not ORAS because 7.8
So let's go with Pokemon Ranger

this
the only ive ever seen for pmd is by game reviewers

Too good for their liking.

Bingo! Explorer of the Skys, no idea honestly it was quite fun

au.ign.com/articles/2009/10/13/pokemon-mystery-dungeon-explorers-of-sky-review

>The gameplay is repetetive beyond believe. It's not hard, there's no strategy.
Oh, how the times have changed

Wow, what niggers.

Because it's not something they can cheat their way to winning, if you haven't noticed by the recent "muh accessibility" debacle.

they are bad games

NINE POINT EIGHT OF OF TEN

Attached: q6tsN7f.png (585x457, 149K)

>Explorers of Sky
>"Ok" music

Attached: 81f.jpg (480x628, 36K)

Halo 4?

twitter.com/jackdrat/media?lang=en
AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHH IMAGINE MY SHOCK

Attached: 1543861971066.png (840x650, 262K)

>only one score is below 5
>overall score: 4.9

>No mainline CoD game scored below an 8 until Infinite Warfare which got by with a 7.7
>Doom is a 7.1
>Alien Isolation is a 5.9
>God Hand is a 3
Why do people still like IGN?

Attached: 1555212720892.png (629x1173, 131K)

You right famalam

god hand was fucking terrible though

who in the fuck ever liked IGN?

People don't expect 10/10s for the spinoffs, so reviewers can say what they really think without offending fans too much.

Thus is when they forget the Nintendo bonus

A reviews site has to make low score reviews in order to keep up the facade that they are "professional" when the truth is that 100% of their good scores are paid, so they just shit over every game that gets released without paying for a review.