The diablo games were never good, change my mind

Truth hurts. I only own a PC actually and played thousands of hours of D2X. LoD has shitty enemies, bosses, gameplay, no endgame except mindless loot runs, and it's a kike simulator. The only thing that made it good was the normalfag-tier jump-in jump-out multiplayer that any retard could play combined with autistic grinding and build-tuning for absolute autists meant basically anyone could play the game at any level of commitment.

>multiplayer toddler obsessed with trading
>mad he couldn't have the best gear
now it makes sense. Diablo isn't an MMO retard.
Jay Wilson already made a game for you, it's called Diablo 3

Depends on your personal understanding of these games. Where some people see "just clicking" others see correct positioning, trying to achieve optimal routes and monster kiting, using the correct skills in the correct sutiation, figuring out what sort of items you should pick up, figuring out what sort of builds work best, etc.

>projecting.
WRONG.
I had great gear. In fact, I only had the best gear for my builds. I botted like crazy and kept all the broken .08 gear that was eventually worth a king's ransom.
Single player was boring trash:
>"ohhh man sweet... another procedural shithole with the same boring mook enemies."
Whoop-dee-doo.

No shit it's not an MMO. Good MMOs have endgame content and don't make you play the same campaign three times.
Do you really think Lord of Destruction is anything but a braindead skinnerbox? You play the same game three times and then fight a couple reskinned bosses at the end.

uh, you've just confirmed to me that you're a shitter much worse than I initially though. (a brainlet too, because you don't understand what projecting is -- but that's besides the point)

>botted my gear
>"Wow this game centered around loot sure is shit!"
do you understand how much of a retard you are?
maybe if you hadn't been obsessed with BiS gear you could have slowed down and enjoyed the game. there's a lot in there. the music, lore, and artwork are god tier. you made yourself into the rat on the wheel, not the game.

You're right they were good.

before 1.10

>You play the same game three times and then fight a couple reskinned bosses at the end.
see multiplayer toddler

they are not, endgame consist of running the same zone over and over again for minimal stats increase to do harder content to do the same exact thing you did before and then repeat until you run out of content to do

This
Games are good for one playthrough with a full LAN party and that is that

>It's another episode of an addicted WoW player trying anything different from WoW and hating it.
Plebeian tastes

Attached: power.png (960x814, 1.45M)

Once you beat hell Baal, that's really all there is to do. The mediocre music, lore, and artwork are fully experienced in the first playthough of normal. And that's beside the point: all that shit is mediocre.

Fpbp

Diablo was a fantastic game and one of the very few to make a gothic/dark-fantasy aethetic work.
Diablo 2 was more fun but completely stopped being special in its setting. I loved it as a kid but it's not much more than a dopamine-fest. Graphically though, back in the days it was groundbreaking.

I was thinking about replying in earnest, but it's obvious you're baiting. Last (you) for the retard

Attached: .gif (800x352, 2.74M)

I don't give a shit about any of that and nothing said there takes away from my points.

I don't know what to tell you in that case. Your point is that the game is good because of a bunch of mediocre shit unrelated to gameplay. Do you like Sony moviegames?

diablo positioning is baby tier compared to any difficult game

Further assert your position bitch.