Do you want Bloodborne 2 or Armored Core?

>He wants another Activision unfinished game

3, 4 and 5

Armored Core, as long as they gut all the shitty multiplayer-focused bullshit they added in AC5. God what a piece of shit game.

Nexus if you can't aim without dual-analog
otherwise go from release

4

King's Field V

>every from game is unfinished
D-do I fit in yet?

Suckiro loving redditors will never fit in

BB 2 obviously. AC was a cheap trash series.

I would like a BB2.

Attached: Lady.Maria.of.the.Astral.Clocktower.full.25432121.jpg (1488x2055, 774K)

Bloodborne 2 or Sekiro 2 or Demon's Souls 2

I'm sorry even DSP is better than you at Sekiro. Did you get filter'd by Ogre?

Lost Kingdoms III

>Sekiro 2

pls no.

>Demon's Souls 2
God I hate when people say this. Dark Souls is Demon's Souls 2. They renamed it because Demon's Souls was in copyright hell

Armored Souls or Dark Core.

Attached: 787397534897658945.jpg (279x573, 39K)

This image is disgusting

wtf, you told me Maria is cute

>AC for PC announced
>multiplayer, COOP, PVP
>mod support as the final cherry on top
MUH VAG

Attached: activateinstanterection.png (1220x912, 569K)

demon souls 7 ofc, we just need the same game again

I want Otogi 3 or a port of 1 and 2.

AC

Tenchu

>I want Otogi 3
fucking loved 1. got the demo by pure chance and replayed it dozens of times.

It would be Demon's Souls 6. Sekiro is not a Souls game

Dark Souls is autism lore plus rushed to cash in the souls formula
Demon's Souls had a story and decent combat

pls yes

SEGA PORTS WHEN

Attached: 7pesos.jpg (1200x800, 151K)

Armored Core

BB doesn't need a sequel.

might as well be

Armored Core all day everyday.

i'd a love bloodborne sequel that is similar to bloodborne first yharnam area
even before blood starved beast it shows the levels were rushed

You want another round of NOT SKIP MOVIE user?

Attached: 367h6.png (1509x663, 70K)

Yeah, we're done with armored core and mech shit in general

Armored Core, I'm sick of Souls games now.

Armored Core and I'm a huge Soulsfag. I want From to finally do something actually different. People meme about Sekiro being something different but its barely spin-off tier from the souls games. It feels very similar in so many aspects.

The only part in BB that felt remotely unfinished was Yahar'gul. Everything was either excellent or fine. I'd still like a sequel though.

And the chalice dungeons
And nightmare frontier
And nightmare of mensis
And Bygenworth

>do you want a sequel to one of the greatest games ever made or a medicore mech series
gee i dunno

Any news about that Metal Wolf Chaos port?

Why not both ?

>wanting more formulaic sequels instead of From being allowed to try what they want
Go away. I can't wait for Sekiro DLC but I'm going to be very disappointed if they make another Sekiro with the same recycled shit.

>And the chalice dungeons
Who cares about them? They are randomly generated crap. If they were not added nothing would change

Normieberg identified

more Maria

Attached: 1505400096286.gif (343x239, 1.03M)

>They are randomly generated crap
not the main ones

>And the chalice dungeons
That's proc-gen.
>And nightmare frontier
Nothing wrong with it.
>And nightmare of mensis
Nothing wrong with it.
>And Bygenworth
Nothing wrong with that either.

Bloodborne is unfinished deal with it

If you don't like a lesser known series then you are a normie

From's best series needs to return. More cyclical dark fantasy stories are not what we need in 2019

Attached: 1455021604545.jpg (797x1024, 121K)

It's their most finished souls game, I don't see anything wrong with these areas except for Yahar'gul.

This isn't a hard question

PLOT TWIST!!
Chromehounds 2

Déraciné already gave us enough Bloodborne stuff, no need for more, that game is perfect as is.
I'll take another Armored Core any day.

Attached: 1544115115996.jpg (627x885, 302K)

Bloodborne 2. Who the fuck cares about armored core?

Deep Souls.

>tfw sekshitto sold more in 10 days than BB did in 4 years
Post your face when From will ditch Bloodborne 2 in favor of Sekshitto.
Post your face when PCfags ruin everything for actual hardcore gamers.

Attached: GoodPalatableDwarfmongoose-iphone.jpg (1280x720, 31K)

Why is Sekiro considered a bad game?

Because its not Dark Souls

>hairy armpits
>thicc
>pubic hair showing

yep, a man of culture

Souls burn-out is a real thing and probably the reason DaS III is so hated.

>pubes
patrician taste

you're cheap trash, whore

>and probably the reason DaS III is so hated

Nah it's mechanically fine but so linear and unoriginal compared to the previous two

In terms of gameplay, it's better than DS2 but DS2 has more content and way more of it is original

youtube.com/watch?v=tC7Cmn68GSA

Armored Core 6. AC as a series still has so much more it can evolve into, in a way no game involving controlling a human can.

Attached: __armored_core_last_raven_and_etc_drawn_by_1840__33c6899e625b3dd09c96b900b0d0e370.jpg (768x1024, 778K)

DaS2 has way too much content. Base game is large and it has 3 (THREE) fucking DLCs. What were they thinking?

Bro I really want to fuck maria.

Bloodcore

both

yes I'm sure it's that and not the ridiculous linearity, uninspired boss fights, worst dlc in the series (ashes of ariandel), the constant throwback/reliance on DaS1's lore without any logic (andre) or any answers, the absolute shit state of weapon balance at launch, or the continued bias towards hosts in invasions (4 (four) summons plus seed)

The autistic fixation on its few downsides is pretty much a sign of souls burn out. People scrape the bottom of the barrel to justify their lack of interest in it, and that's likely a result of souls burn-out.
They can't put their finger on why the fun is gone because there is very little wrong with the game, they've just played it too many times before.

I actually drew the armpit air, pubes and sweat fumes

>worst dlc in the series (ashes of ariandel)
Not when the Ivory King DLC exists.
>uninspired boss fights
Nice meme, DaS3 has the best bosses in the series

All those problems are pitally-shit which is exactly my point. BB was more linear than DaS, not as linear as DaS III, but doesn't get shit on nearly as bad over it.
You're really scrapping the bottom of the barrel to pull shit like "Hur durr uninspired bosses" or "Oh my god Andre back for NO Reason" even though the fucking game gives a you a fucking reason for Patches and Andre being alive.

ivory king is way better than ashits of ariandel, and it's not even great

>DaS3 has the best bosses in the series
lol no, all the gimmick bosses are awful and the ones that arn't almost all play the same, not to mention their health pools are awful so they barely get to go through their movesets save for gael and midir (another shitty boss that just leaves itself open 90% of the time). Best bosses are BB for balance of variety or DeS for actually having good gimmick bosses

literally perfection

Armored Core because From shouldn't be chained to making soulsborne forever.

We haven't had a good mecha game in ages.

>not as linear as DaS III, but doesn't get shit on nearly as bad over it.
no shit it isn't as bad as DaS3 of course it wouldn't get shit on as much

I'm not sure how shitty DLC, ruined invasions, poor weapon balance, and bad lore are "scrapping the bottom" for a souls game

>or DeS
Don't get me wrong, I fucking love Demon's Souls, it was my first Souls games and still is one of my favorites but the damn bosses are just so fucking bad. I don't know it feels like there are a total of 3-4 good bosses and one of them is Maiden Astraea who is only good because of her lore/music

DeS gets praise for not having awful gimmicks, otherwise bosses arn't exemplary with a few exceptions like tower knight. 3 had the worst gimmick bosses

i want something that isn't a sequel or prequel

AC6 please.

Ashes of Andriel is overblown in how bad it is because people expect the DLC to be about bringing in a finally tuned boss rush; it had but one good boss and one sub-par boss.
Despite this, the Painted World is a large level with a good bit of enjoyable exploration; faggots need to appreciate that more than just sit there jerking off solely to the idea of more boss fights
>Ruined invasions
Fine faggot, invasions were ruined and DaS II did pvp balance better. We get it, Miyazaki is a fucking retard in pvp balance and the game made invading as a red spirit a massive up hill battle rather than a bullying game which missed the point.
However, I'm not going to sit around and suck DaS II's dick solely for its superior pvp just to give you one little iota of agreement that DaS III pvp isn't great. BB also had sub-par pvp ruined by stupid shit aswell, but nobody cares because when jerking off BB the PVP doesn't matter.
That's why I avoided focusing on PVP.
>bad lore
The lore is fine, I'm not going to play that level of subjective retardation, not yet at least.

yfw the 6 in AC6 is actually an upside down 9

Attached: 9ball.jpg (2070x1088, 238K)

just like you

nobody is sucking das2's dick, I never praised it. 2 has big problems too, that doesn't excuse 3's

otogi 3

i wouldn't be disappointed as far as the next game will be good, no mater it's bb2, des2, das4 or sekiro 2

Oh man, I remember reading a magazine back in 02 with the quote "Otogi: From Software's answer to Devil May Cry" and ever since then I've been dying to give it a spin but it's fucking stuck on the Xbox.

I don't care, anything From touches turns into a masterpiece anyways. They don't make bad games. I will play literally anything they make.

Dark Souls 2 is kinda bad

I want a souls-like gaming with interconnected world from beginning to end with multiple rotes to the end boss and stuff. 3 games after DS1 and they still didn't do that, it's time already.

Honestly I feel as if this series's potential gets closer with each entry, and we're on the brink. The amount of ability disparity between a newcomer and a longterm vet gets wider with each game, with VD being almost two completely different games depending on who you ask. We're gonna get it at some point, but it's gonna take time.

Attached: 1443298023654.jpg (1600x1200, 204K)

>3 games after DS1
You ever consider that DS1 is the only game to actually do that, and that all you want is just to play DS1? Because they didn't do that for Demon's Souls, it wasn't relevant in King's Field, Armored Core certainly didn't do that, and no other game since DS1 has ever had interconnectivity actually matter beyond periodic minimal shortcuts that don't make a difference.

Attached: 1438476057902.png (500x500, 19K)

>and that all you want is just to play DS1?
In the first part of the game. It's time to take the next step. They played too safe on the sequels.

The chalice dungeons actually are 100% finished

I was going to say something Shadow Tower inspired with a bit of an eldritch/alien bent and guns, but that's already Bloodborne. I guess sci-fi would be neat.

I want a Berserk game!

sekiro is on PS4, xbox, and PC. of course it sold better than bloodborne.

DS shitters wanted a dark souls game and they got a game where you cant overlevel or summon someone to play the game for you. Why do you think?

>too safe
What the fuck

Every single game after DS1 has been a stark change in pace, direction, and mechanics. DS2 focused extremely heavily on RPG mechanics and the idea of stats and builds defining your character more than anything else. BB decided to ditch RPG mechanics and aim almost 100% towards action combat and emphasis on speed with the RPG mechanics simply being a feature added to what is otherwise just an action game. DaS3 decided they wanted to stuff in everything at once and make a hodgepodge of RPG stuff with action stuff and in their attempt to create DS1Borne they wound up making a mess with a billion little items that do nothing and a few powerful things that thrive on the game's ridiculous mechanics. They have not played it safe in any game except for DS1, which was just Demon's Souls but with checkpoints and no World Tendency.

I'm talking about level design you retard.

Something completely new that doesn't rely on the souls formula at all.

Braindead Soulsfags can't handle the game without their summon buttbuddies.

Yes, you illiterate. I'm talking about that too. DS2 is built to accommodate players moving in any direction that they want, and as such, isn't built with a focus on sending you down a choppy pathway with doors turning backwards. Then comes Bloodborne which is a straight-up action game that wants you to beat it level by level. Lastly we have DS3 which is damn near a singular line with one breakpoint and a bunch of extremely tiny branches, mostly as a consequence to making the game focus so heavily on the RPG """freedom""" but still balancing it as if it were an action game. Demon's Souls has numerous shortcuts, but the game was focused on approaching the end of teh game from five branching pathways, which is very difficult to convey to a newcomer. Dark Souls literally just shows you one of two ways to go, and you just playfully make your own path from there.

I really think that most people fellating DS1 either haven't played it, or have only played it at this point.

Happy for our guy desu

I don't get the other replies. If you want to play the next gen ones, don't play 4, skip that shit and play 4A.