Soul

Soul.

Attached: conker-800x500.png (800x500, 436K)

Soulless.

Attached: conquers-bad-fur-day.jpg (553x311, 139K)

Literally all remakes/remasters are soulless and inferior to the original.
For the record RE2 2019 is not actually a remake but a reimagining, basically a new game that borrows iconography.

Presumably this is just a shitpost thread where we go OLD GOOD NEW BAD, but I genuinely can't stand the way this looks. It's that awful mix of semi cartoonish and semi realistic, like Nuts n Bolts and portions of N. Sane Trilogy. Pic related was much better, but still not quite there.

Attached: ingame_art_01.jpg (1920x1080, 226K)

>Original Conker looks at you pissed off while the other is just looking down like shit

Hot take: I enjoy both art styles as they try to achieve something different in each game. N64 Conker was trying to play up the cutesy but rude style while also being limited to the N64's tech limitations. By the time XBOX Conker came out everyone already knew what kind of game it was going to be and the artists on the team wanted to try something more realistic but also cartoony (Possibly to show off the XBOX's hardware). Either way I enjoyed both games and would love if they brought the old and new one to PC with multiplayer but hey that's just me.

>one is trying to have an artstyle that plays on an overarching theme of the story
>other is “LOOK HOW COOL THE XBOX GRAPHICS ARE COME BUY IT GOY”

Literally soul vs soulless

At least the controls weren't ass on the xbox version and multiplayer was actually something interesting. Both still have their charm even with the art style changed, it's all movie references and swearing.

This. The whole point of Conker's art style was you're supposed to look at it and be reminded of cutesy kids' games like Banjo and Mario, which creates a visual contrast when set against all the gratuitous violence, gore, swearing, rape jokes, etc. The remake is the ultimate reminder of why graphicsfags are cancer, because they don't care about anything else as long as a game renders enough individual hairs and blades of grass to satisfy their autism.

I'm not really sure what you mean by this, Conker looked the way it did because all Rare's N64 games looked like that. Live and Reloaded looked the way it did because that's how all Rare's 2000s shit looked, Kameo and Viva Pinata and Nuts & Bolts. If they had remade Banjo instead of Conker it would have had that same style of visuals. Even if the original was
>lmao look at these cute cartoon characters doing bad gross shit
it only looked like that because that was about the most complex they could do.

posting these again

Attached: image0-8.jpg (1536x2048, 436K)

Attached: image0-10.jpg (1536x2048, 488K)

haha the boss is a big poo xd

Attached: image0-12.jpg (2048x1536, 676K)

Attached: image0-9.jpg (686x915, 165K)

God berri makes me rock hard. Pretty sure she was the first thing I ever jerked off to. I blame rare for my furry lust today unironically

explain yourself

Yesterday, BFD's director posted on Twitter some concepts and script he had for the sequel way back then (these were made after Conker's development was finished).

Attached: b921364c51e7784218f042497a2dd258.png (1280x1133, 1.75M)

Soal

Attached: gfs_41917_2_52_mid.jpg (540x405, 31K)

What a good game

Don't one of these basically confirm Conker's age and he's fucking 15-16 during Bad Fur Day?
How in the hell