What do they eat?

They grow food right here. You can enter the buildings and everything.

They also talk about how they grow so much corn they make fuel from it.

Attached: Untitled.png (1728x1080, 3.11M)

pusy

You made this thread already you autist

Nobody in the history of video games or TV has ever thought about supply or logistics. It's a joke in literally any setting.

>get BTFO'd in yesterday's thread and run away before the thread becomes discussion about the game
>let's try it again today, maybe someone will be on my side for once
And all of this just because OP is upset people made fun of Fallout 3 when it was released.

What do they eat?

Attached: Jacobstown_entrance.jpg (1920x1080, 1.2M)

They all got mutations that let them eat dirt.

i've been waiting

Attached: 1447622391723.jpg (2001x2800, 698K)

based

What's with the Fallout 3 baby getting pissy as of late?

Humans!

based

Whatever Jacob and his pack of uber soldiers bring back

boolets
lots of it

Boomers will tell you they grow """beans""" for protein or some shit but they're god damn cannibals I tell ya.

>dumb meme thread
>obsidiots immediately start seething about fo3
OH NO NO NO

It's so strange seeing western media and eastern media strictly through the lense of food. It seems that eastern media relies heavily on food when it comes to designs of characters and environments as every anime having at least one food segment every few episodes.
Whereas western media seems to avoid food at all costs generally.

>can't recognize patterns
Apes are smarter than you famalam.

Nightstalkers and mountain water

FUck that i am rolling havn't played this game in ages and i want to

This is literally only true if your only experience with western media is video games and Hollywood action schlock.

That's objectively not true though. I mean, maybe in vidya they really don't discuss the topic of food but in film, literature and many other artistic mediums food is just as integral in the setting, characterization and identity of the story itself.

Fuck dude, literally every mafia film has like 3 scenes dedicated to food MINIMUM.

best thing posted in this trainwreck of a thread, rolling

Western shows also suck dick at doing beach episodes, GoT has never has a single beach episode.

>tfw you roll a shitty character

>It seems that eastern media relies heavily on food when it comes to designs of characters and environments as every anime having at least one food segment every few episodes.
Well they need a time to fil with something.
The same reason why there is so many filler-episodes.
Also, probably because of history of modern anime and manga

Yep, you're still mad. Now to get this thread going post your gunfu.

Attached: DinnerBell.png (2000x467, 423K)

Damn new vegas looks so dated nowadays. it's a shame there's nothing like it these days, that new obsidian space game doesn't really look promising either.

lets go. Im almost done with my slut playthrough

Why not?

Reminder that a regular hunting shotgun with all mods is better than Dinner Bell

I can't decide if i should reinstall and go straight to new vegas or install TTW and go through 3 first.

Attached: 25806329.jpg (1430x640, 97K)

Food scenes are incredibly common in Western media. Look at the Odyssey

3 is shit why would you want to play it

Doesn't have the mossy oak furniture so you can't larp as a basic bitch duck hunter.

>install TTW and go through 3 first.
It's not worth the trouble, also why would you play 3 at all?

Nostalgia and Point Lookout

rolli'n

You're overrating NV and underrating 3. Neither of them were really great or really terrible.

asdf

I disagree. 3 does nothing better than NV and NV is miles better in every department except for the actual shooting in which its improvement is only marginal

>being this butthurt
You made this shitty thread yesterday, get over it.

Loli secretions.

Attached: 34.jpg (1720x1439, 776K)

What's the order in which I should play the DLCs?

Why are you trying this hard, Todd? Is it because you've never managed to make a good game?

HH, DM, OWB, LR

People will tell you to do DM and then HH and I want you to know that they're wrong.

>3 does nothing better than NV
No. The world was infitely more better in 3, it was just more interesting simply to explore. NV had better writing and had a lot of quality of life improevements but it was forcing into a corridor within the first act of the story while 3 gives you total freedom to explore from the start and many of those QoL improvements were just a reaction to 3's feedback and incorporation of popular mod into the game. Fallout 3 is a sandbox game, NV is an rpg, there's no need to fight which one is better because they aren't really simillar games if you don't count that NV was built using 3's assets.

Aight

champion of the wastes incoming

TTW is only worth it if you want to play the FO3 portion with NV mods - by the time you've done at least a relatively complete run of FO3+DLCs, your character will be so powerful that going into NV would just be lame.

Better you keep your NV mod profile separate.

Attached: 183.jpg (2560x1440, 1.3M)

Any good ENBs for this or are they all blurry, flickering messes?

>only worth it if you want to play the FO3 portion with NV mods
That's exactly what i want

Nah. 3 has awful worldbuilding so why would I want to explore the world at all? NV's "corridor" is negligible in the grand scheme of the game's content. Also stop pulling it out your ass that 3 is meant to be a sandbox game, it's not.

youtube.com/watch?v=JbtBKG6Bhd4

I always install TTW even if I don't plan on playing through the Fallout 3 main quests because of the DLCs, also TTWInteriors has some cool house themes and all your hotel rooms have see through windows, maximum comfy

>Implying I would waste time on NV
Fallout 4 is better

Great, go for it then.

Whatever, let's agree to disagree

Attached: Survivalist's_rifle.png (2950x750, 1.09M)

Yes

I personally love TTW. More content overall and it's honestly the best way to play FO3.

Lets go

Attached: 36588251_1846964132271883_7744687523523198976_o.jpg (1815x1080, 213K)

Rolled almost what i do every single playthrough except i do Boone and Lucky 38

Shotguns are the comfiest weapons.

brahmin

Last time i had to play a fucking saint who doesn't gamble, drink or use chems, i hope i don't have to do that again

To!!

300 year old microwave dinners

Cunny-cola.

I've studied New Vegas lore extensively, in-game and out.
So to answer your question, "what do they eat?," the answer would be: DEEZ NUTS NIGGA

They breed bighorns. It's pretty obvious.

stop

Attached: 2029452 - Fallout Fallout_3 Maggie.jpg (621x794, 91K)

Where's the grazing grounds for the bighorns? How do they feed and sustain a large enough herd to feed a lot of super mutants?

rull

Attached: here.jpg (479x361, 25K)

Rams graze in the mountains. They're not cows you idort

It's a military base you spaz, they get supplied from elsewhere

Rollio polio

The mountains are all impassable, checkm8.

NV is 3 but for people with an IQ above 100

semen

>3 does nothing better than NV
As someone who has played every Fallout game (even 76) and ranks NV highest, I disagree.

3 has better side quests and better exploration- the exploration in 3 is by far the best in the series. NV has better writing, role playing, immersion, and a better main quest, but people forget how much cool shit there is to find/collect in 3 and how dynamic the side quests actually were. Almost every names side quest had the same level of complexity as Beyond The Beef.

As the other user said, you're massively underrating 3. NV is still better overall, but 3 is great.

How would I make a basedboy build?

No? Off the top of my head the grayditch one is as complex as 3 gets.

>3 has better side quests
No, it doesn't and I don't even see the point in engaging further if you think this. It barely has any side quests at all and literally none of them branch out as much as Beyond the Beef. 3 is shit, it fundamentally fails as a roleplaying game.

You are quite obviously a dumbass.

This.

>Off the top of my head the grayditch one is as complex as 3 gets.
Which shows exactly how wrong you are since that's one of the least dynamic ones. go back and replay it.
>Trouble on the Homefront
>Replicated Man
>Blood Ties
are all definitely on par or above BTB. The rest are just around or below it, and all of those quests are in general more dynamic that the vast majority of what's in New Vegas.

>dude vampires
>Nuka Cola museum
>Republic of Dave

Attached: 1448313853725.gif (271x226, 1008K)

>revisit home vault after you beat the game
Dynamic.
Forgot about the synth one because you have to sit through at least 30 loading screens to finish that one. Also how does it impact the story?
>vampires in a tunnel
Yeah, that one is about on par with BTB

I'm not going to do this for you so do it yourself. On the wiki go to the Replicated Man quick walkthrough and look at it and then go to the Beyond the Beef quick walkthrough and look at it.

Roll it

hardhome nigguh

its a cold fuckin beach but still

>that shitty bloom

Okay, here you go. Like I said, they're about on par or higher. Considering how many of those holotapes are scattered around it's actually not very uncommon for that to be the way to initialize the quest (it's how I came across it my first playthrough and the last runthrough I did as well).
Just because you always pick the same path every time doesn't mean those branching paths don't exist.

Consequences from side quests are still more real in NV, but a lot of that isn't really from effective worldbuilding. Most of it comes more from the end game slideshow. Where NV does a fantastic job in worldbuilding and consequences and dynamic quests is in the actual faction quests/main quest. Those top most quests in Fallout 3, and they rank miles and miles above 3's main quest.

Attached: Whatdidanonmeanbythis.png (1122x466, 43K)

>talk to people
vs
>actually do things
DYNAMIC
Y
N
A
M
I
C

What IQ am I if I like both? Don't want to be a centrist nigger so I'll say that NV is vastly superior to 3.

where do I find more fo lolis

Attached: 1435694409153.gif (157x157, 424K)

It looked dated when it came out.

Does anyone ever actually play out these?

Well, first off
>encounter
>find
>search
>search
>prove (this requires gathering information that doesn't not require dialogue)
versus
>go
>return
>return
>kill and cook
>kill
>kill
Secondly, I see no reason why a quest can't be considered dynamic or complex or deep just because you talk to a lot of people. A choice is still a choice, and dialogue in that quest is in itself fairly dynamic- you have to convince an android he's an android, you have to lie, and you have to persuade someone to give you information. It's pretty arbitrary to cast it aside as non-dynamic just because a lot of your choices go through the dialogue tree.

How are they not a bunch of inbred retards? There isn't really that many of them in that airport.

KFC

Sorry I can't hear you over DYNAMIC talking to people. It's too DYNAMIC for me to understand you. Try being DYNAMIC next time.

doesn't require*

Point is, your definition of dynamic is arbitrary. Go back and play through 3, the quests are much better than you remember so long as you try not to pick the same path every runthrough. One thing NV does better than 3 is outline all of your alternatives- in 3 it's very easy to get stuck on the same path every game.

Well I'll just take your sperging out as a win then.

I can never get into NV for some reason, maybe this time will be different.

Let's goo

It's shit bud. Stop trying to defend it because it was your first fallout and move on. Every thread you make the same dumb points and no one cares. Fuck off.

It's more fun to make up a character yourself

I hate most of FO3 but i can agree that some quests are well made, it's just that NV is way better when it comes to quests

>I have been proven wrong even after moving the goalposts so all I can do is call it shit and pin you as a nostalgiafag

Attached: speech.jpg (900x900, 140K)

whatever traders bring from qasmoke

Attached: 083rer.gif (239x119, 127K)

>proven wrong
Wait, lets go back. Dynamic is a subjective definition. Talking to people is the same as sneaking around killing folk. Searching boxes is the equivalent of passing dialogue checks. My oh my, fuck off and die you worthless moron.

If you read my post I actually outlined all the non dialogue options in both quests.They're pretty much equal. Replicated Man just happens to also have more dialogue variety as well.
>Dynamic is subjective
No, I'm just saying it's arbitrary or at least dishonest to say that all dialogue is created equal. That's like saying all combat options are the exact same, so I could lump all the
>kill
>return
in the same category and what you have looks much less dynamic. Or I could lump go and return together under explore. It's just moving the goalposts because for some reason you don't think dialogue counts.

So you're calling the kettle black then?
>muh goal posts
Yet every thread you change your story. Pathetic. Go away no one will miss your stupid attempts at trying to make F3 look any better. Nobody.

>Yet every thread you change your story.
This is the first 3 v NV argument I've ever participated in on 3's side. Get over yourself.

>F3 sidquests blow NVs out of the water
>well ok only one
>well its second place to NVs
Jesus Christ fuck off already.

rock n roll

my jhonny

>obsidiots still seething

Attached: 1528755888449.jpg (183x262, 14K)

OP here. Lmao u obsidian cucks.

>only one
No, I mentioned 3 side quests that were better than the one side quest in NV most people consider the absolute best (and I do too). Most of 3's other side quests are a fair bit worse than BTB, but most of NV's side quests are also a fair bit worse than BTB. The vast majority on both sides boil down to evil choice v good choice, and NV has just as many brainless fetch quests as 3. Overall the side quests in 3 are on average more memorable and more dynamic.
>second place to NVs
Where did I say this? I mentioned multiple places where NV does quests better. Upfront I clarified that the main quest (which includes all the faction quests, though I more explicitly stated that later on) is better in NV than in 3. No one is contesting that. I'll take Arizona Killer and Finger of Suspicion over fucking Waters of Life and Tranquility Lane any day.

Why the fuck do i get shit performance on a ryzen 1600

I also never said 3's side quests blow NV's out of the water, I just mentioned that it was one of the two things 3 has over NV. Side quests, and exploration.

Reread your own comments replies dumbass. Stay consistent for the love of God.

>on par or higher
>they're actually not
But here you are saying 3 on the whole does side quests better than NV. Amazing. Maybe start writing stuff down so you can keep track of the lies and shit falling out of your mouth?