Was it in poor taste?

Was it in poor taste?

Attached: IMG_6350.jpg (1024x768, 65K)

no

Great forensics tool

yes

maybe

Yes but at least it was educational. LGR should review it during edutainment month.

Sure, but there's nothing wrong with that.

>an interactive tool used to show the impracticality of a historical event's theories for how it played out
Nah. If it was trying to make fun of the subject matter or some shit, sure, but it played itself straight.

LBJ did it.

Maybe if someone actually won the contest they were running to 1:1 recreate the assassination in their game, but nobody ever did.

No more so than any game based on real life death. Such as WW2 games.

It wasn't realistic enough. Where were the extra shooters, the CIA and the mob?

Attached: 1306319843139.jpg (269x263, 49K)

it was made purely for stupid edgy purposes, but hey, it isnt hurting anybody.

anyone getting honestly offended over the JFK assassination needs to get their fucking ego out of their ass

it didnt had women so its ok today

I'd say it happened long enough ago and it took itself seriously enough for it to pass.
Would it be in poor taste to have an image of a ship hitting an iceberg for a titanic educational game?

How dare you look at a simulation of something instead of accepting what the country's government says, what is wrong with you monsters. Literally worse than Hitler.

ITS OSWALD, WHACK EM

Is it really still fucking too soon? It happened like 70 years ago. Almost everyone who would be offended is dead.

A little, but I respect his right to make it.

No, it handled the subject very well. But even if it was more exploitative, there's nothing wrong with that. Just don't play something if it offends your sensibilities.

I'm surprised it was controversial when it was released. Who gives a shit about the president being assassinated any year past the Bush Sr. era?

It was supposed to be educational wasn't it?, if anything it showed how bloody difficult it was. Never thought i'd have fun shooting a president though.

yes, if you're a retard

daily reminder that GGGmanlives is a token brain-dead retard

Attached: GGGmanlives, borderline retard.png (864x588, 66K)

>911 flight simulator
So... Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A 9/11 simulator would be based. Imagine the amerilard butthurt.

The poor taste part was the contest because you can't prove or disprove anything with video game physics.
If somebody won the contest, it would have proven that the simulation was written in a way that allowed for the right chain of events to occur. It would have not proven anything about what happened in the 60s.
Since nobody won the contest it proved nothing at all.

>instead of accepting what the country's government say
The fucking irony of this statement is the game's intended purpose is prove the commissioner's report of the assassination. Not to say it was a conspiracy.

>killing one person in a videogame is immoral and offensive
>killing millions of men brutally and forcing NPC children to grow up without a father is """fun"""

Virtue signalling, everybody.

Attached: 1467653771145.jpg (342x316, 55K)