Why do pre HD era games have a SOUL but modern games don't?

why do pre HD era games have a SOUL but modern games don't?

Attached: gta-sa_2019_03_04_22_12_23_321.jpg (1920x1080, 1.1M)

cause you were younger

R* started wasting resources on a shitty MMO addon instead of letting modders do a better job for them

>another 'why do i like games i played when i was a kid' thread

Attached: leddit.jpg (396x382, 41K)

> San Andreas
> yellowish tint and MOAR everything
> soul
Not really. Vice was good, tho, but all that "in da hood" parody story clearly targeted bixnoods on welfare.

Attached: 1555523227555.jpg (600x415, 186K)

visual clarity

>blurry textures
>tons of aliasing
>low draw distance

>visual clarity

why do pre 3D era games have a SOUL but 3D games don't?
why do pre HD era games have a SOUL but modern games don't?
why do HD era games have a SOUL but super realism era don't?

I'll go back after I'm done here.

what game is this?

Gta san andreas

You came outta someone's penis, and it lead you here; a peerless faggot.

because they let you stay in the past

quite the mouthful

actually it stands for grand theft auto: San andreas

Because you're closer to 30 every day and you still haven't integrated your mortality yet.

now thats just ridiculous

doubt that sold well

>Camera angles (makes the world seem bigger)
>Smaller draw distance with lots of fog (makes the world seem mysterious)
>MUCH clearer in general, less clutter because of weaker systems
>Lots of limitations forcing devs to make less mechanics and shit and use them in more situations instead of leaving a bunch of useless shit no one cares just because MUH CONTENT like today's games
>Smaller budgets/teams so more passionable people working there

art style>trying for photo realism

Attached: 1534582500085.jpg (936x1436, 211K)

Eat a apple.
Tone down on that philosophical shit.

Well, the next one was simply GTA IV. You might be onto something.

idk i see it a lot these days
maybe it did, grand theft auto 5 sold good

i dont know who that bald faggot boomer is but hes wrong

Attached: 1555350646236.webm (942x808, 1.86M)

Are you applying that to San Andreas, making a general statement, or both?

Because San Andreas was pretty much trying to achieve realism as logistically possibly. There's no unquie art style to speak of.

fuck you
i hate you scumbag

Catering to more means watering down and polishing any sharp edges that would give an experience "soul". Also, DLC and microtransactions.

I lost my virginity before San Andreas came out
People here say "game you played as a kid" or were even born after it
FUCK

fuck you too

Fog. It really is just the fog. Limited draw distance made just about every game require it, which made the games seem more soulful and mysterious, and your brain filled in what the game was missing. This is why even remakes that retain most of the modelling and such still feel soulless, they never leave the fog in. Worst offender has to be Silent Hill.

Attached: download (4).jpg (224x224, 7K)

So what if we downgrade a modern game?

>Because San Andreas was pretty much trying to achieve realism as logistically possibly
Yes but becuase of constraints had to use artstyle to hide it's failings
Most games have strived for realism

Attached: 1446157338067.webm (1280x720, 2.9M)

real mature
asshole

I don't think that HD and graphics technology has to do anything with it. It's all about art direction.

i love bloodlines' visual direction

Attached: 1457308610647.webm (1440x810, 2.73M)

Well, that's what you would think.
Because you're obviously an idiot.

I hate you idiots, posting your illogical shit all over this board...

Are you accusing me of confirmation bias? Well I might be guilty.

because those games were actually good, modern games aren't

Post more aesthetic games

More effort. Nowadays it’s all graphics and getting the most money out of it.

>bixnoods on welfare
im sure such niggers buy their games instead of pirate them, yeah, that makes a lot of sense - NOT.

Attached: 1493931754669.webm (700x436, 2.99M)

>a apple

Devs have to spend 99.99999% of development and budget making new games look 0.0001% better than all the other new games and then just throw gameplay in as an afterthought

Because this is how your brain works:

BAD GRAPHICS - SOUL
GOOD GRAPHICS - SOULLESS

I'm actually getting further away from 30 every day.

Soul.

Attached: ets2_20190416_154844_00.png (1920x1080, 2.17M)

where can I play said GTA1 3d?

this is premium 1997 max comf

Whoa, I'm feeling hypnotized.

that HUD seems smoother. is this modded?

Because you won't take off your nostalgia goggles, brainlet.

Attached: 1517968006989.gif (300x290, 1.74M)

Attached: 1451695163168.jpg (1920x1080, 732K)

Attached: 1528394054603.jpg (1920x1080, 284K)

>nostalgia goggles
>still thinks fucking Mario 64 is good

Attached: 03-SM64.png (613x238, 100K)

Attached: 1527193266749.jpg (1920x1080, 333K)

Just hd hud and unofficial patch, still pretty much a vanilla game, I don't like putting skins on my game

Game?

>pre HD
my shitty crt in 97 was capable of 1600x1200 75hz

A-Train
Train Simulator

Attached: 1527193434506.jpg (2640x768, 425K)

>barely ever liked any early 3D shit back when it was the big thing, specially on consoles
>same opinion nowadays
>fags think I'm either being a contrarian or a trolling zoomer

Attached: I seriously hope you guys don't rape this.png (250x250, 88K)

Ah thanks. I like games where most everything looks outdated except for one aspect. Example would be far cry with the water and the one from your pic

Attached: Densha de Go Ryojohen.webm (640x480, 2.82M)

That is san andreas?