Thoughts?

Why?

Worth

Why would anyone buy this at this price? They should at least make the console $150. Also, being a 4k blu ray player is one of the last advantages the Xbone has over the PS4.

Isn't the normal Xbox One S $250 already? Talk about a pointless product.

The PSP Go is fantastic and anyone who dislikes it is dumb
Name me another device as small as it that can emulate PS1, PSP, and all classic consoles

>$250 for an Xbox One S without a disc drive
>$200 for an Xbox One S with a disc drive

Attached: 20190416_224249.jpg (767x431, 57K)

Nintendo Switch.

>As small as the PSP Go

not the point

PSP hacks were a thing in 2009

from what they were saying on the stream it sounds like they're going to try to hold a $50 price difference between this and the S. hopefully that means that whenever the S is on sale for $200 this will be $150

>$50 extra bucks for a console WITHOUT a feature the cheaper one has

Attached: 1530357316184.jpg (528x528, 12K)

Too expensive for that hardware.
Should have been an X for that price.

No shit. Anything is better when you hack it. The point was that the PSP Go is the same concept of no physical games and I don't know how you fail to see that.

And the PSP Go was great
Digital Xbone would be good too if it had hacks

I don't give a shit about Xbox games like fifa, CoD, Battlefield, all the typical shit that comes out on that platform, but would this cheaper Xbox be worth getting for the back catalogue of xbox exclusive games that have been brought to the digital store?

Probably harmless, but people also laughed off Xbox Live once upon a time and look how standardized paying for online is now. I don't like the idea of a digital only future and I don't like seeing consoles that are trying to test those waters.

It's 50 less. Though right now xbone is on sale for 250 so lol.

Unless the SAD version be sold at 50-70 bucks less than the MSRP like they do with the default console, it will be a failure.

A shitty product saved by hacks doesn't make the concept better.

>The PSP Go is fantastic and anyone who dislikes it is dumb
Priced higher than the regular PSP when it launched (which as I recall the regular PSP could be easily had for like $80-$100 less brand new at the time) smaller screen with a less comfortable form factor and worse battery that unlike the original wasn't user-replaceable, and you give that all up for what? An all-digital PSP?

But it failed at being that too, because although the one advantage it had was the 16gb built-in storage, the regular PSP was still better at being all-digitial because 1) you could drop the all-digital plan if you ever wanted or needed too, like if there was ever a game that got delisted or something, so the PSP was better at all-digital because it was a voluntary and negotiable all-digital whereas the Go was inflexible, mandatory, permanent all-digital, and 2) The Go used an even more expensive proprietary storage format than the original PSP, driving the high cost even further. In fact, the Go's in-built storage was negated because you could get a regular PSP and a 32gb Memory Stick Pro Duo for less than the cost of a Go. And MSPD-to-MicroSD converters have been available forever too, which not only allow an even cheaper storage format for the original, but also much bigger storage capacities as well, as some of them can accept two MicroSD cards and read them as a single volume.

PSP Go sucked.

>Name me another device as small as it that can emulate PS1, PSP, and all classic consoles
That doesn't mean the PSP Go wasn't a piece of shit. You have to turn it into something decent by hacking, and even then it still sucks because a PSP can do all that while having a bigger screen and cheaper memory card options, which is better than being smaller. GB Micro has its fans too, but it again is too damn small for its own good. PSP Go sucks because it failed at the things Sony was trying to sell it on and its own predecessor was a superior option at those very same things.

>EK BOK
LMAO