Pokemon and standards

Am I the only one who thinks pokemon should have been blown out a long time ago? If any other company pulled half the shit game freak did they would be in the ground
>Reusing N64 models up to the wii
>Releasing a director's cut of a game 2 years after the main title is released more than 10 years in a row
>handing of the series off to different devs who make a vastly superior game
>falling behind graphically and not upping their team size
>having the same shit ass battle system with minor tweaks for the last 20 fucking years
>ridiculous game mechcanics

Why hasn't anyone called them out on their shit, and why has no reviewer slammed them? Honestly Nintendo and it's subsidaries have a quality standard bar, and pokemon hasn't met that in years.

>INB4 fucking with their cash cow
Please, Mario has been in every genre and has pulled it off phenomenally.

>INB4 it's for kids
So is everything else

This is a lack luster shitty series and someone needs to come down on it fucking hard.

Attached: pokemon cd.jpg (581x608, 264K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3ltQDO-rxoU&t=634s
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

That art is great, I've never seen it before.

Lemme guess, You want them to do something stupid like an open world game where you can also become a Team Rocket member and have real time battles. Short version, don't fix with is not broken.

Attached: 1454828528788.png (218x429, 107K)

The series will never evolve thanks to the retarded fanbase.
Just look at this shit

Attached: 1555317636135.jpg (334x88, 8K)

just play yokai watch 2 and 3 instead

no, a decent rpg, with decent fucking sprite animation like mystery dungeon, or at least good textures instead of shitty futureproofed models.

Maybe a different battle system altogether, yokai watch is taking risks, why not pokemon?
youtube.com/watch?v=3ltQDO-rxoU&t=634s

wtf is this? Is the first time i see it

I agree that the series has lots of problems, but how would you do the battle system differently? Real time would be awful since you'd still be inputting commands for your mon to do
It is annoying how whenever this shit is brought up you get braindead fanboys shouting "OH SO YOU WANT AN EMPTY BORING OPEN WORLD ASSASSIN'S CREED COLLECTATHON HUH?" No you fucking mong, we just want more than the corridor walking sim we currently have. You could have the exact same formula we have now with random battles and needing 8 badges while opening up the world. Make environments worth exploring. Some people want the ability to challenge gyms in whatever order they'd like, and while that would be neat it has some obvious problems. You could have levels scale with the number of badges you have, but that would be strange with wild pokemon whether they leveled or didn't. Also some gym leaders are just meant to be stronger than others and that wouldn't really work if you could challenge them at level 15
Sure there are challenges, but they're not impossible. Well it is Game Freak we're talking about so

Then why not go play Yokai Watch?
Fucking retard.

Could fucking be that people like it. Dont you think dement?

What part of don't fix what is not broken don't you get?

Because Yo-Kai Watch is Yo-Kai Watch and Pokemon is Pokemon. Why does one have to be like the other?

Yeah you're the only one that thinks this fucking shit

>arpgshit
Die die die die die die die die die die kys

Because the games are still great and only the most autistic spergs (read: you) think that these problems completely undermine the overall quality that the series has consistently maintained

Are you retarded, asking for the battle system to get changed? Literally the only thing that works is the battle system, fuck you, you're the reason jRPG games these days are getting so bad, you fags want everything to be real time instead of tactical and turn based. Fuck off and fuck you.

You are retarded. The games have been fundamentaly broken since the start and GF refuses to fix them.

It's got about 800 unique creatures.

>Pokemon is not meant for kids!
Stay in /vp/.

Attached: 1394340253370.png (666x500, 558K)

Why, because it's not some real-time shit like Tales? Pokemon started as a handheld series where you take your game on the go and find others to trade and battle with.

I agree with you 100% OP.
People who disagree are Nintendo cock suckers boys and conformists.

Picture unrelated.

Attached: 1554705922958.jpg (750x745, 461K)

GameFreak is incompetent, what else is new.

Why do you all even discuss pokemon or care about it past 4th gen? Its so fucking stale at this point in all ways a video game franchise could be. Its the peak of video game laziness that hollywood does.

You must have serious autism to still care and dont wanna move on like people do when a game gets stale.

Yet Sun and Moon sold like crazy.

>Reusing N64 models up to the wii
So that's why eevee is so fucking ugly in XD.

Attached: file.png (331x266, 130K)

>B-but the masses will eat anything they're handed!
Face it, people like OP never liked Pokemon, they just followed the fad like most people then and then got mad when it grew as a series instead of being that cool thing they remembered as children.

That pic is a huge missed opportunity. With all the we live in a society veronica memes it's too perfect that the newest Joker turns bad because of SOCIETY

Fuck off back to where you came from, tourist.

I'm impressed they didn't atleast redo the eevee's just because they were the main pkmn for the 2 GC games.

You are right. I apologize fellow gamer.
Your hostility contributes nothing to this gaming thread. Be gone.

Attached: 1554691996645.jpg (750x674, 42K)

any other fanbase
>hmm I do think x would improve the games, but I can't say the same for y for these reasons
autistic pokemon fanbase
>ree how dare you suggest that pokemon should change in any way whatsoever. if you like x so much why don't you just go and fucking play x

Attached: 1555236937340.jpg (609x753, 372K)

>ree how dare you suggest that pokemon should change in any way whatsoever. if you like x so much why don't you just go and fucking play x
Well, yeah. Why does every game need to crossover with each other? What's wrong with variety? Pokemon does what Pokemon does and other series do what they do. And that's okay. Plenty of spin-offs do interesting stuff, why not play them? Pokken, Mystery Dungeon, GO!, there's enough to pick and play.

Kill yourself, faggot.

>ree how dare you suggest that pokemon should change in any way whatsoever.
There's a reason pokemon spin offs exist, retard.
Pokemon fans aren't against the idea of pokemon games being different.
They're against changing the MAIN GAMES into something other than what the main games already are.

Well it was mostly just XD. Dont think you cold breed in Colosseum

They've been riding the wave of Gen 1/2 for the last 20 years. I wish they would just do something cool. Why can't we have starters who are dragon/steel/psychic? I don't care if they don't have a rock-papers-scissors balance, it would offer the player an interesting rp choice and the game could easily be balanced despite that. But they don't want to balance shit, they keep creating a new pidgey and a new rattata for every gen. They keep creating pokemon with cool types who are totally useless because they have a high attack stat but only special attacks or some other ridiculous flaw that destroys any reason to use them or even care.

>Why can't we have starters who are dragon/steel/psychic?
You fags are the absolute worst kinds of people.

pokemon gets by on the combination of the nintendo bonus, a fanbase with no standards who will buy and defend shovelware as long as pikachu and charizard are in it, and the media not taking the franchise seriously enough to truly scrutinize it.

Gamefreak is a minor indie company that sells their game at loss, pls understand.

Bug/Dark/Ghost would be better.

That's fine too, the thrust of my point there wasn't to autistically argue that the games NEED psychic/dragon/steel starters. It's just an example of something cool they could do with the games.

No, I mean in the sense that it follows the type triangle, though only forward, not backward.