They have best production team, one of, if not the best game engine in the industry...

They have best production team, one of, if not the best game engine in the industry. Now they just need a team that can make additive game play elements and they would be the goat. Why do they refuse to acknowledge that problem with their games?

Attached: Rockstar_Toronto_Logo.png (2000x1840, 68K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=grLNpDbYIpo
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

I like their no additive gameplay

what the fuck is an additive gameplay element

Naughty Dog is better.

Rockstar dev here. What exactly do you people mean when you try to critique our game play? And say that it's boring? None of you ever go into a lengthy detail of what you're talking about. Or have any sort of factual information to back up this claim.

If our game is not fun to play, why is it still selling five months later? Why is there such a huge demand for it to be on more systems? These games I see a lot of people on the internet trying to spam as being fun like FROMSOFT games, RE or Persona (which I respect) don't have the legs we have. People are clearly willing to buy and play our games much longer than any of these games you people claim to be more fun. The legs that our products have show this to be a fact. So what information can you supply to indicate that we are going in the wrong direction?

>Best game engine
LUL

theyre laughing all the way to the bank since every game they put out is a fucking commercial behemoth and enjoyed by everyone except contrarians

yes, no other allows more system overlays and interactions

Attached: wallhaven-744303.jpg (1920x1072, 242K)

yo which studio? I'm a dev too

a big fat LEL to you, my good man

Attached: 3d3d3d3d.jpg (275x183, 9K)