>The developer also discussed PS5’s retail price which is going to be $499. According to his post, Sony will take $100 loss during the early stages of PlayStation 5’s launch.
Literally PS3 all over again. They never learn, do they?
segmentnext.com
>The developer also discussed PS5’s retail price which is going to be $499. According to his post, Sony will take $100 loss during the early stages of PlayStation 5’s launch.
Literally PS3 all over again. They never learn, do they?
segmentnext.com
Other urls found in this thread:
guinnessworldrecords.com
twitter.com
No interest until we start hearing about launch titles. I'll wait years to buy it just like I did with the PS3 and PS4 if I have to, I refuse to buy a console with nothing to play
why do snoyegers eats up literally everything like that, without any actual proof? For nintendo you needed samsung numbers and even then it was just considered speculation.
Do you actually believe a trannie is trustworthy by default?
Get a job, lil broke ass boi
rent free
>literally one of their most successful products all over again
>they never learn
Please stop talking like you know shit.
>PS2 sells like hotcakes
>Get cocky and fuck up PS3
>PS4 sells like hotcakes
>Get cocky and fuck up PS5
Maybe you're the one who needs to do his homework.
>ps3 outsold by a wii
>ps4 outsold by a wii 2.5 aka switch
>ps5 will be outsold by a wii rehash
guinnessworldrecords.com
>sold more home consoles than Nintendo sold Gameboy Advance (portable baby magnet shit) consoles. Okay bud.
I hope PS5 plays PS3 and PS4 games, desu.
snoy boys will buy it because muh FIFA in 8k
Selling consoles at a loss like this is normal.
You left out the part where they lost literally every cent they ever made on the PS1 and PS2.
It hasn't been the norm for quite a while. Specially not at a 100 dollar loss.
Well people also buy phones for 1k and more now very willingly
Things changed a bit
Ps4 was such shit when you look at its entire life, I can't even bring myself to care about ps5 at all let alone this early. Thanks to ps4 I became a BPC slut, fuck you sony
>quite a while
This generation is the one exception. Even then the ps4 was still sold at a loss.
THIS JUST IN. THINGS COST MONEY. MORE AT 10.
Can't wait to see Sony make that argument.
I was just about to buy a PS4 when the censorship scandal started. Updated my PC instead. Already played Bloodborne and the only other game I wanted to play was Spider-Man, but I think I'll live.
HOLY FUCK I DIDN'T KNOW THIS
>ps2 had the equivalent of a high-end pc gpu, ps1 hardware for backwards compatibility, and a motherfucking DVD DRIVE all for 300 dollars (before inflation)
>OG xbox had a gpu more powerful than the best pc gaymen gpu at the time
>people think that selling consoles at a big loss is some kind of strange new strategy that nobody would dare try
Lead loss is pretty common. Both MS and Sony did it. Idk about Nintendo, I cant imagine the Wii was particularly costly to make, and the Switch is basically at Xbox 360 strength--there are low end desktops and laptops at Best Buy that can probably mop the floor with it if you forced both of them to run Skyrim side by side. Not a criticism exactly, but im not sure the Switch costs Nintendo much to make at this point
>sony sells console at a loss
>to recoup the costs, they up the price of PSN and make even less games
>snoy nigs lap it up with a smile while buying FIFA 21 and GTA 5 HD
If the backwards compatibility stuff is true then that's a helluva deal.
All you poorfags crying about how expensive shit is is why we have underpowered consoles this gen.
Sony was smart with the PS2, since DVD was a new medium and they released (at the time) the cheapest dvd player on the market that also played games.
Also did it with the PS3G, but Bluray took longer to gain steam. Even PS1 iirc was a good cd player for what it was.