When it comes to sexualization of women in video games is she right?

women: sexualise themselves

guys: do the same

women: "wow wtf"

based

>twitchwhore roastie
>but muh MK11 skimpy outfits though!!!11

She is right.

She's not wrong

What outfits?
I don't play VN's.

Who the fuck cares about the dev's profit?

Rolling for a qt 3.14

based

>GAMERS RISE UP

Attached: 1554317293098.jpg (1100x1097, 147K)

aye

why do you retards post this shit? It just bumps the thread and encourages more like them since they get replies.

OP: makes off topic twitter thread

mods: ban him

OP: wait no

gottem XD

100% fine with women profiting off their sexualisation. You are paid what you are worth in this world, always.

Get outta here baaaybeeeee

>No anthro

Twitter is the biggest cancer of the gaming/internet.

Attached: 1548438653998.jpg (790x767, 76K)

I wonder if there is any difference between a company making digital women, who are not real, dress scantily clad compared to a person literally prostituting herself to thirsty faggots on Twitch? Nah, probably not.

So this is pretty much "don't put women in hot outfits, unless we want to" ?
Seriously, are they really that mad over how pixelated fictional characters are dressed ?

How do I pirate marriage, bros? I'm so fucking lonely

Attached: 1554336389830.jpg (670x566, 90K)

I understand now, this is why they complain about fictional female characters showing skin even though they show a lot of skin themselves irl. It takes away potential profits from them.

what do i get

No, because nobody really cares if women profit off of getting sexualized. Women get money, which encourages them to go above and beyond to be an even bigger whore, which benefits the man. It's a win-win, especially when you're not retarded enough to actually pay the woman, and just get her shit for free and let the betas pay for you.

Attached: this triggers autists.webm (1000x563, 1.79M)

What does that even mean

this!
why can only us true gamers see this?
we you should make the world see the truth and rise up!

>dress scantily clad compared to a person literally prostituting herself to thirsty faggots on Twitch? Nah, probably not.

What's wrong with that? Men have no self-control at all and always blame women. Instead of getting angry at smart sexy women who know how to sell their looks why don't you blame your fellow man because they're so retarded and thirsty?

If guys dont want her to profit from sexualuzation whos paying the woman?

I do too user

I wish twitter caps were a bannable offense.

You know, something like this would have made me upset in the past but now I'm beginning to see the funny side of things. At first I thought my life was a tragedy, but now I realize its a comedy.

Why can't I blame both?
Or blame - I don't even care really, I just hate them larping at being anything but whores, let's just call it what it is.

it's more like
>women: do nothing difficult but just exploit sexualization, while demanding equal pay and status as an engineer
>guys: wait no

Whores have existed since ancient times, nobody was against it. People are just against it when you start believing you're a hard-working memeber of society.

You're free to profit off your sexuality all you want.
Just don't get upset when people call it prostitution.

It's the opposite. The ones trying to prevent women from profiting from their sexuality is other women, in the guise of protecting them.

Can someone translate this from retard speak for me?

It doesn't matter. Because whether you want sexy digital women or a real one your desires are all but the same. But the hypocrisy is you disowning women who sell themselves.

Attached: 1554477572565.jpg (400x397, 64K)

Unironically true

based rolling

> why don't you blame your fellow man because they're so retarded and thirsty
Of course I do. I cannot even fathom how much of a cuck you'd need to be to give money to girls showing off cleavage just do they say your name in the chat, when there are literal millions upon millions of free porn vids out there. The point I'm making, at probably the original guy you were replying to, is that women should be able to be called out for being camwhore thots. Tumblrinas actually get fucking triggered by being called for what they are, literal prostitutes.

>guys: sexualize woman

What? We hold them down and force them into becoming twtich thots and twitter models? No, women sexualize themselves

It goes like this:

Women: Sexualize themselves

Other women: what a trash hoe

Women: Men are disgusting, they made me into this trash hoe.

rolleroni

>women profit off sexualization
>in video games
How the hell would virtual characters in a video game profit off real people?

Attached: confuse.jpg (2000x1684, 154K)

>Of course I do. I cannot even fathom how much of a cuck you'd need to be to give money to girls showing off cleavage just do they say your name in the chat, when there are literal millions upon millions of free porn vids out there

It's not about getting off to people saying your name you absolute fucking retard. Some of these guys like me crave attention and looking for a hot friend.

This is not spam, just a role

Attached: Khayon.jpg (640x735, 250K)

Based, nuke this shit

Based Rouletteposter

...

...

t. cuckus maximus

OK. That legit made me laugh. It is guys that mostly moan at other guys about shit being sexualised

>Guys: Please stop censoring our digital females in video games! I want them sexy in scantily clad outfits!

>Women: Profits off of their own body and sexualization

>Guys: Fucking slut roastie. Get the fuck out of here.

>mods skipped the lucky septs
Gay.

pizza roll

Gimme the good shit.

God I wish that was me