The absolute state of AMD-fags

>The absolute state of AMD-fags

Attached: Benchmar.png (1426x918, 414K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/LQDMpKrzLgs
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

> Saves money on a better graphics card
Yeah they surely are fags.
As much as Intel chips are good at gaming, I still would go Ryzen because they're better at other things, for a good price.

>bought an i7-8700k new last year for £290
>check prices now
>nearly £400

Attached: 1548716549867.jpg (720x346, 24K)

>87% of the performance of a cpu that costs nearly double
>gap is lessened at higher resolutions
>don't need an industrially chiller to cool it
Embarrassing.

>doesn't implode
Should I get a weaker but reliable part or a stronger but unreliable part?

My GPU recently died, and was debating up upgrading everything.

Looking at the cost of shit, to make a PC roughly equal to what I have now, I'd pay the same amount of cash as I paid back then.

Id hate to imagine what an upgrade would fucking cost.

>1080p
let's see that difference at resolutions that matter

Attached: 1527191739215.jpg (228x228, 28K)

COPE

Attached: __nagatoro_ijiranaide_nagatoro_san_drawn_by_sorapoi__sample-614adad03954eaa37ba7db7404a30c42.jpg (850x917, 152K)

Did Intel ever fix the massive performance loss caused by fixing their giant security flaw?

Attached: 613157-intel-core-i9-9900k-gaming.png (884x596, 22K)

I bought a r5 1600 months ago for really cheap, should i worry? I wanted the 8400, but it was a lot more expensive.

Intel or otherwise, no one needs 100+ FPS.

And the 99th rating is on par with the 9600k/8600k/7700k.

as expected

HAHAHAHA

>Playing in 4k
Lol tryhards

>no one needs 100+ FPS.
this, reality runs at 15 fps

>Intel or otherwise, no one needs 100+ FPS.
based
The human eye cannot see more than 30 FPS

>400$ cpu cant do 4k
>200$ console can do 4k
Really makes you think

I have a Ryzen 5 1600 and play Hitman 2 just fine at 60 fps despite it being one of the most lopsided games there are when it comes to CPU brands, that graph only tells you that AMD has better 99th percentiles than far more expensive CPUs which means far more stability.

>trusting Nvidia that gimp hardware everytime

Attached: 1463369659480.png (1600x1607, 467K)

what why does far cry primal & rise of the tomb raider lose 10 to 30 fps on AMD card in 1080p but then in 1440p and 4K they're equal to the intel one

this make no sense

>muh 30fps
>1080p
>not benchmarking hitman 2 dx12
Who gives a fuck? Everyone Runa 1440p 100hz+ or 4k 60+ now
T. 2700x and gtx 1080 perfect combo waiting for Zen 3 5nm and mcm Arcturus

>200$ console can do fake, upscaled 4k at horrible framerates

Fixed for you

And a 400$ Cpu cant even do 4k
Kek

There's a CPU bottleneck limiting the maximum framerate. It's irrelevant when the GPU is the bottleneck.

>ryzen 3000 about to come dab on incels
youtu.be/LQDMpKrzLgs

Attached: FAGGOT.jpg (679x758, 54K)

Lower resolution= more cpu dependent, cpu becomes bottleneck.
Higher resolution = more gpu dependent, gpu becomes bottleneck.

I'd imagine at that point, the gpu is the bottleneck.

>CPU
How can you even breathe, being so dumb

Attached: inpainting_results.png (881x893, 79K)