When's it coming out?

upvoted btw

I want Persona 3/4 HD Remaster more, or SMT Nocturne remaster.

Why would you want it after what they did to DaS?

An inside source at Sony told me they've got a special Japanese team working on it for an Christmas/Early 2020 release for PS4 and later PS5.

But there's a catch.

The team is being forced to remake the entire thing in that "Dreams" engine Media Molecule are working on, and they're really struggling because the engine is neither finished, nor accessible to them by any means other than the Playstation move controllers. He said they've basically got the levels and the gameplay roughly sorted out, but that the graphics and music look and sound like something out of a fucking Rareware title on the N64.

The source told me that this is also why "Dreams" is taking so long to come out, that and the fact that Sony's got another team remaking Final Fantasy Seven for square in it too.

>new engine
This is not a good look desu.

Nice fanfiction.

Demon's Souls is owned by Sony, not Bamco.

ask bluepoint games

>That one game which actually needs a remaster doesn't get it

Fuck Sony. And we sure as hell didn't need Dark Souls remastered From

I hope it doesn't get a remake.
Mainstreaming it and normiefying it would destroy the whole experience.
Playing Demon souls is offline playing on a cold rainy night in your ps3 while you try to play without checking on guides.

Three birthdays this year
Ape Escape 20th anniversary
Wild ARMs 20th anniversary
Demon's Souls 10th anniversary

Next sony direct for sure ;^)

recently replayed it.
People who think demons is better than dark souls(1) are delusional console fanboys.

There are so many piss easy bosses, level design is extremely linear though having multiple paths to choose from was nice.
The world tendency system while interesting was implemented horribly.
Online was plagued by scraping spear faggots

Only the thing demons souls absolutely nails is atmosphere

Someone please show me their RPSC3 settings for DeS, I copied what it says on the wiki but its always loading in shaders and runs at like 20 FPS with frequent drops

hopefully never

i agree that dark souls is the better game yeah but there's some things about demons i just enjoy more
it felt alot more new at the time of release and while dark is just a more refined version of that just thinking about how dark then brought along 2 and 3 kind of bothers me

Pls respond

What's your CPU

AMD 6 core

It has like 3 different publishers,euro,NA,and JPN all have different publishers for this game so it would be a legal mess to get everyone to agree and come up with a plan to get a remaster.

I was just watching someone stream the game on twitch at 60FPS in 4K. And he enabled the high resolution textures. If you didn't know, higher resolution textures are stored on the game's disc. The game simply doesn't use them, due to the limitation of the hardware. But the emulator can toggle them on. So the game not only has better framerate, it has better resolution, and better textures.

But no... Let's """remaster""" the game. So some devs who weren't a part of the original graphics team, can butcher the atmosphere of the game with newfangled lighting engines, and "enhanced" shaders.

What's the point? Just upgrade your PC.

Emulator can literally play this game 1080/60 with no drops

No it doesn't you lying fag.

The emulator devs purposely cripple AMD processors because they don't like them. Tough luck.

For this game I wouldn't want them to simply remaster it. I would prefer a remake that alters the game in many creative ways. Keep certain things familiar like the archstones and Nexus but change things up a lot please.

Can I emulate it on an i5 4690k at 4GHz at stable 30 fps?

I'm too autistic about emulation accuracy to play on anything but original hardware.

COMPILING SHADERS

No. Modern From would ruin the game and turn it into Dark Souls 3.5. The only gameplay changes it needs is Bloodborne's storage system and fixing some bugs like running firestorm.

damn

Well Demon's is better in the sense that it had far more interesting mechanics and ideas. However, in true Fromsoft fashion, instead of making shoddy mechanics work better, they just cut them out entirely.

World tendency is too convoluted? Well fuck actually teaching the player. Just cut it out. Now every world is static!
Item encumberment causes players to lose loot? Well fuck making the game remember where loose loot was spilled. Just make storage infinite!
Character tendency barely noticeable? Well who has the time to make it more dynamic. Just get rid of it. Now every player is the same.

Scraping spear was fun. I never even used it myself. But it made invasions more interesting than just some faggy tryhard lag stabbing you.

>graphics don't matter
>framerate doesn't matter
>rush out to buy every remaster like the good paypig you are

Attached: 1540379854287.png (633x874, 56K)

>Just upgrade your PC.
Uh sure, let me gauge that.
1500$ vs. 50$ for a used PS3 and 10$ for the game.
Uh yeah.

probably
won't hurt to try, game's like 5gb

level design is better in demon's. Linearity isn't a flaw, any of demon's souls' levels are better than the dogshit that is demon ruins/lost izalith or duke's archives/crystal caves

I have the same processor and the answer is not really. It reaches 30FPS most of the time but then the meme RPCS3 emulator hits with his COMPILING SHADERS meme and shit hits the fan.
When attacks hit any objects that break you also suffer from massive fps drops.
So it kinda works, but the game isnt good enough to suffer through this shit

It's 95% accurate. The only graphical error, is the sun's glare is more intense than normal. I think it might be that the transparency isn't applied.
The emulator does crash often. I'm not sure what causes it. But it's nothing that makes the game unplayable though. You might run into a few crashes, and then it'll play smooth for hours.

Good thing that Demon's Souls is smart about saving. So you always load back where you left off.

What did he say

Why would you need a used PS3 for a Demon's Souls remaster?

Why doesn't Sony just release Demons Souls on PC like that, then? Just port it to PC as is. Zero dev cost.

Attached: 1487009667622.jpg (404x356, 64K)

I want the opposite. DeS has several wonderfully unbalanced things. Weapons that are straight upgrades to other weapons exist in DeS. The Estoc is better than the raiper in every way. The winged spear is better than the short spear in every way. All the weapons have a range of moves that make them useful in all situations. There's no gimping of gear for PvP. There's an item dupe glitch that they never patched. The best set of armor in the game is for males only. Several bosses can be cheesed with the thief ring and posion. The sticky compound dex bow has INSANE dex scaling. The morion blade and red rat ring allows you to enable hyper mode and become a glass cannon God.

A remake would ruin all of this.

I would prefer a remake done by Miyazaki.

Level design is better
Bosses are better
Game is better

"piss easy bosses"
So Dark Souls?
There is not a single hard boss in Dark Souls 1

Mere graphical touchup won't be enough as the game is horribly dated compared to the games that came after it

>piss easy
t. played on pure white world tendency
Kill yourself.

I just want a Deep Down type of game. Capcom had something interesting and we might never get a game that looks like that which is a shame. My vision of the remake would actually look like that game with its combat.

Was there any point in any Souls that was harder than the Ano Londo rooftop archers? I died a lot to them. More than any boss.

Attached: 32b.jpg (672x562, 122K)

>60fps
>when game physics is tied to fps
Post discarded.

if you played on ps3/360 when it was released in the first 2/3 weeks before the game was casualized, no. If you played after when the archer on the left was moved so it wouldn't interfere when you fought the one on the right, yes plenty

>the first 2/3 weeks before the game was casualized

What is this meme?

>Level design is better
This is arguable since Dark Souls has trash like Lost Izalith, but Dark Souls at its best is better than Demon's Souls at its best. Especially if we expand level design to include world design.
>Bosses are better
100% nostalgia. Demon's Souls has a small handful of decent bosses and a bunch of garbage ones. Dragon God is legitimately worse than Bed of Chaos, because at least the latter doesn't waste your time and isn't hyped up by the game.

patch 1.04/1.05 (japan/west) casualized dark souls hardcore. It moved enemy placement to make sections easier, like the archers or the dragon asses in izalith, make skeletons drop souls, increased the amount of humanity in the world by a fuck ton, increased item drop rates, made fog ring and fog ring enemies useless, increased amount of souls gained by certain enemies among other things. Original DaS on ps3/360 pre-patch was harder than demon's souls if you didn't cheese it with shit like iron flask but post patch the game is easier

tower of latria > any DaS area

This is the stupidest thing I have ever read

Games that should be released on PC:

>Demons Souls
>Bloodborne
>MGS4

>Dragon God is legitimately worse than Bed of Chaos
Objectively false. If you die to the dragon god, it's a 20 second walkback. If you die to bed of chaos, it's a 2 minute walkback.

You can survive dragon god'd punches and fire. With a bit of luck, you can bruteforce your way through. With Bed of Chaos, death typically come from fall, which is an instakill. And you have to navigate a floor that doesn't reveal pits, until you're inches away from falling off. While hands are trying to swipe you into the pits. And then in the final phase, you need to pretty much take a leap of faith, before you can calculate where to fall safely.

despite being easy, the concept behind DG's fight is far superior to CB's, so much so that from knew too and had to break the rules of the game just for that single fight (shackles don't reset)