Anyone else feel like video game graphics have become too realistic...

Anyone else feel like video game graphics have become too realistic? It's no longer an art form it's just people tracing real life

Attached: hairless horse.jpg (1920x1920, 625K)

You literally just summed up the current crisis in modern art.

But yes, style > realism.

no, the problem is that people bitch so much about realistic graphics that any stylized graphic game would look terrible regardless of game play.

>no, the problem is that people bitch so much about realistic graphics that any stylized graphic game would look terrible regardless of game play.
>What is Sekiro
>What is RoR2
>What is Classic WoW
>What is dominating Yea Forums right now
You're a moron.

I don't mind. the real art of videogames is the way that the player interacts with it. It's the one thing video games have over other artistic mediums.It's a performance art where you are the artist.

>Art is dying waaah
Shut the fuck up. You don't care about art. You just like complaining about stuff.

No, they're not even close to being realistic yet, but the race towards realism is the laziest path and so many see it as the pinnacle of graphics.

Attached: 1442581451861.png (300x240, 90K)

Video games are not art, they are pretty packages programming you to kill without thinking.

Yeah, mk11 looks like shit because of it

That's a spooky horse.

i agree, there is no way in hell i'd wanna fuck that horse's pussy

I'm increasingly finding games with a high level of detail exhausting and a little depressing. I make my way through RDR2 and the demo of RE2 and im overhwelmed with detail, im sure there's a mind numbing degree of interesting details that could be in every corner but I just don't have the time to take it in. The predecessors to those games on simpler hardware like GTA3 or Remake 1 allowed you to take in their environments because, GTA3 it was fairly simple and easy to pick out interesting details, Remake1 had admittedly detailed backgrounds but there was a set amount of images that were easy to fully absorb and see interactive elements like items etc.

When I say predecessor I just mean older games in the same series or made by the same devs, I know RDR2 isn't a sequel to GTA3 nor Remake2 being a sequel to Remake1.

>AAA games = movies with hyper-realistic uglyfied women
>Indie shit = art

Attached: 1546800499831.jpg (400x400, 23K)

>im sure there's a mind numbing degree of interesting details that could be in every corner

That's just the thing - there isn't. That's what makes these games so depressing. Despite looking amazing they are void of meaningful content. Much like real life.

I do like stylised graphics, but a game can perfectly be art without that. Games are much more than the sum of their parts, otherwise we couldn't call them art.

>programming you to kill without thinking
What benefit is there in that?

that horse looks raw

This. GTA SA was memorable, GTA 5 was a blur.

Nothing wrong with scanning real girls

Attached: real_all_collage.jpg (3972x1604, 1.2M)

Why is it so horse-like in appearance?

gordon?

real life is good you manchild

Attached: 00000006230113_A01.jpg (640x640, 54K)

Because it's a horse

Good looking stylised games will always look good, good looking "hyperrealistic" games will look janky in 6 years.
Doesn't mean you can't have both at the same time, a real looking game can have a style to it, but blindly chasing realism on its own will make the game very forgettable.

yeah i much prefer things looking weird. it's like having an animation where barely anything visually interesting happens. at that point just point a camera at a person.

agreed
everything is a detilaled, blurred, flashy, reflective, godrayed and shined, it's a fucking mess
even if it sounds cringy: 'less is more' applies great in vidya visuals

What the fuck are you talking about? Art being about realism died off when Moderism took over.

There are around seven billion people too many on the planet, according to experts.

Gamers are going to kill them all?

You say the word “gamer” like it’s an actual thing.

People who play video games are going to kill them all?

that's not rebecca's face model, what the fuck is this picture

The only issue I have with realism is when it harms gameplay.

I think the only problem with it is that if you want to make a realistic looking videogame, you have to beat a very high standard so that it looks good. Otherwise you can just make your own style to fit with the game. Look at Telltale games or Borderlands games. It's realistic in its own way and they've triumphed with it.

Attached: 6534753478.gif (500x480, 1.42M)

RISE UP

>Laziest
Hardly, and that's the problem. Going for the greatest, most visually impressive realistic graphics is not only hard, it ages like shit. People jerk off about how realistic Red Dead Redemption 2 looks, but I can guarantee in 3-4 years we're all going to think it looks dated as hell.

anyone else feel like op is a goddamn gay moron who has no idea what the fuck he's talking about and should stop making shitty threads with off topic images?

Well I assume the skillset can’t be too far off from drone operator, and attack drones must be the most efficient way to go about such a mass disposal, barring weather manipulation I suppose.

>mfw winking horse pussy

Attached: 1488965734413.gif (200x200, 823K)

lol this guy eats glue

Anyone else feel like live-action movies are too realistic? It's no longer an art form it's just people tracing real life
Because you bcan‘t have realism and style at the same time, right?
The problem isn‘t realism, it‘s idiots without any imagination using it without a vision. But realism is just another tool next to stylisation and both can be used well or badly(see callarts)

no, ideally we would be able to seamlessly recreate reality digitally

Most will kill themselves or won’t reproduce. I don’t know what it is about the nature of the industry that attracts these kinds of people.

Working with limitations are how the best games are made, I don't know why people fell so hard for the grafixs meme

Attached: 1554333471478.jpg (572x621, 104K)

the becca one is not scanned from that person. It's a cam whore that happens to look like becca, not the other way around.

Jill was scanned but here is the big thing it wasn't made worse by current face tech.

Jodran/claireis not accurate at all and looks bad

damn, he loves being white

Too much toxoplasmosis, too little sunlight.

I just saw naked horses and entered this thread. Whats going on?