Sekiro barely has any replay value other than New Game Plus or the different endings.
Bloodborne was honestly better now in retrospect. Hopefully Sekiro gets DLC later down the line for obvious reasons, but yeah, Bloodborne is still better.
Sekiro barely has any replay value other than New Game Plus or the different endings
Camden Evans
Tyler Cox
No shit. This didn't need a thread. Both games are great.
Kevin Jenkins
we've known this for months
>no pvp
>no builds
>no replayability
>no reason not to pirate
Brayden Sanchez
Well duh.
Souls and Bloodborne are way better than Sekiro because they do so much more than just having good combat.
They have atmosphere, soul, online, tons of weapons, replayability, great music
Liam Hall
Bloodborne barely has any replay value other than New Game Plus or the different endings.
Luke Barnes
?
None of the souls games have replayablity and all the builds are the same (mash r1 and roll).
Also, PvP would never work breh.
Justin Morales
The level and world design of Sekiro is so boring. In Bloodborne, you feel like there's something unpredictable behind every corner. After just a few hours of Sekiro, you notice how repetitive its patterns are and you just rush through shit without even exploring areas because it's all useless anyways.
I don't believe Sekiro was directed by Miyazaki. They had a "co-director" so I'm guessing they just used Miyazaki's name as PR.
Jack Jones
I never really replay the new from games that much anyways. Just a couple of times to get anything i missed or different endings in sekiro's case but I legit don't understand how some of you guys can have like over 200 hours in a single souls game. I played through sekiro 4 times and got all the achievements as well and that was like 60 hours. Even with pvp in DS I've never gotten over like 80
Adrian Reed
Sekiro's level design shits all over BB, you retarded fanboy.
Isaiah Brooks
Not at all. Sekiro's level design is so mundane and soulless.